전쟁 기억과 전후 중일외교의 중층구조 - 전쟁종료문제의 인식과 해석의 어긋남 -
A Multilayered Structure of War Memories and Postwar Sino-Japanese Diplomacy : Discrepancy between the Idea and Interpretation on the Issue of End of War
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research is about the memory of the end of the war between Japan and China. Why people in Japan and China commemorate the end of the war on August 15, 1945? At the state level, Japan and China dealt the issue of the end of the war on the diplomatic normalization process. And the final report, the Joint Communiqué of the Government of Japan and the Government of the People's Republic of China, declared that they ended the "abnormal relations" on September 29, 1972, which failed to be remembered as the day of end of the war. In order to find the meaning of the end of the war, this research traced the negotiation process of 1972 Joint Communique. At the starting point, one of the main issue of the negotiation was how to phrase of the end of the war. However the phrase was changed to the end of abnormal relations. Also, there were differences on views over the reflection on the war and responsibility of the war, but the leaders of the two countries reached the compromise not to discuss about the conflict issues. In a nutshell, the 1972 Joint communiqué was finalized with strategic ambiguity. That is why people remember the Joint communique as 'the normalization treaty', not 'a peace treaty'. The war ended, and that was declared, but the war on the war memories is still ongoing.
Abstract
This research is about the memory of the end of the war between Japan and China. Why people in Japan and China commemorate the end of the war on August 15, 1945? At the state level, Japan and China dealt the issue of the end of the war on the diplomatic normalization process. And the final report, the Joint Communiqué of the Government of Japan and the Government of the People's Republic of China, declared that they ended the "abnormal relations" on September 29, 1972, which failed to be remembered as the day of end of the war. In order to find the meaning of the end of the war, this research traced the negotiation process of 1972 Joint Communique. At the starting point, one of the main issue of the negotiation was how to phrase of the end of the war. However the phrase was changed to the end of abnormal relations. Also, there were differences on views over the reflection on the war and responsibility of the war, but the leaders of the two countries reached the compromise not to discuss about the conflict issues. In a nutshell, the 1972 Joint communiqué was finalized with strategic ambiguity. That is why people remember the Joint communique as 'the normalization treaty', not 'a peace treaty'. The war ended, and that was declared, but the war on the war memories is still ongoing.
참고문헌 (47)
- E. H. 카, "역사란 무엇인가" (2008), 홍신문화사
- 강상중, "내셔널리즘" (2004), 이산
- 권오기, "한국과 일본국" (2005), 샘터
- 김효진, "끝나지 않은 전쟁을 기억하다", 일본비평, 2(1) (2010)
- 남기정, "중일국교정상화와 한일관계-지연된 갈등-", 일본연구논총, (33), pp.29~64 (2011), 현대일본학회
- 동북아역사재단, "일본의 전쟁기억과 평화기념관. 1, 關東・東北 지역" (2009), 동북아역사재단
- 동북아역사재단, "일본의 전쟁기억과 평화기념관. 2,關西・九州・오키나와 지역" (2011), 동북아역사재단
- 모리 카즈코, "중일관계-전후에서 신시대로" (2006), 리북
- 베네딕트 앤더슨, "상상의 공동체: 민족주의의 기원과 전파에 관한 성찰" (2007), 나남
- 사토 다쿠미, "8월 15일의 신화 : 일본역사 교과서, 미디어의 정치학" (2007), 궁리출판사
- 서승원, "북풍과 태양" (2012), 고려대학교출판부
- 소에야 요시히데, "일중국교정상화를 되돌아보며-1970년대 일중관계에서 보는 양국외교의 이질성-", 한국정치학회・게이오기주쿠대학 동아시아연구소공동심포지엄 발표논문 (2012)
- 손기섭, "일중 정치경제관계에서의 '72년 체제'의 발전과 전환", 일본연구논총, 19(19), pp.93~128 (2004), 현대일본학회
- 쑨거, "아시아라는 사유공간" (2003), 창비
- 여문환, "동아시아 전쟁기억의 국제정치: 한중일 전쟁기념관을 가다" (2009), 한국학술정보(주)
- 이규수, "전후 일본의 역사인식-전쟁기억과 ‘대동아전쟁’론-", 日本學(일본학), 33, pp.29~65 (2011), 일본학연구소
- 이찬희, "동아시아의 역사분쟁 : 韓・中・日 역사교과서의 비교분석" (2006), 동재
- 장인성, "제국의 기억을 보는 시선", 일본비평, 2(1) (2010)
- 일본의 전쟁 책임 자료센터, "야스쿠니 신사의 정치" (2011), 동북아역사재단
- 전진, "역사가 기억을 말하다 : 이론과 실천을 위한 기억의 문화사" (2005), 휴머니스트
- 정근식, "8.15의 기억과 동아시아적 지평" (2006), 선인
- 천자현, "화해의 국제정치: 화해 이론의 발전과 중일관계에 대한 비판적 적용", 국제정치논총, 53(2), pp.7~38 (2013), 한국국제정치학회
- 최은봉, "중일 간 센카쿠열도 분쟁과 일본의 해양정책 - 갈등·대응·정치과정을 중심으로", 담론201, 15(1), pp.45~66 (2012), 한국사회역사학회
- 최은봉, "중국의 대 일본 배상청구 포기의 양면성 - ‘타이완 문제’의 타결과 중일 경제협력의 확장 -", 담론201, 13(2), pp.151~176 (2010), 한국사회역사학회
- 최은봉, "냉전기 중국과 일본의 제한적 접근과 쟁점의 유보: 중일 평화우호조약의 교섭 · 체결 과정을 중심으로", 국제정치논총, 52(4), pp.67~92 (2012), 한국국제정치학회
- 한상진, "2006 문명과 평화" (2008), 한국학중앙연구원
- 毛里和子, "中国問題: キーワードで読み解く" (2012), 東京大学出版会
- 毛里和, "現代中國政治-グローバル・パワーの肖像" (2011), 名古屋大学出版会
- 服部龍, "日中国交正常化 - 田中角栄、大平正芳、官僚たちの挑戦" (2011), 中央公論新社
- 石井明, "記録と考証―日中国交正常化ㆍ日中平和友好条約締結交渉" (2003), 岩波書店
- 榮澤幸二, "大東亞共榮圏の思想" (1995), 講談社
- 殷燕, "中日戦争賠償問題" (1996), 橋本盛作
- 田中明, "日中関係 1945-1990" (1996), 東京大学出版社
- 井上正, "日中国交正常化の政治史" (2011), 名古屋大学出版会
- 朱建栄, "中国はなぜ賠償を放棄したか", 外交フォ－ラム, (10) (1992), 都市出版
- 霞山会, "日中関係基本資料集―1972-2008年" (2008), 霞山会
- 王泰平, "日中國交回復’ 日記: 外交部の特派員が見た日本" (2013), 勉誠出版
- 冯瑞云, "中日关系史 第三卷" (2006), 社会科学文献出版社
- Memory and History in East and Southeast Asia: Issues of identity in international relations 23, "Gong, Gerrit W", CSIS, ~ (2001)
- Hein, Laura Elizabeth, "Censoring history: Citizenship and Memory in Japan, Germany, and the United States" (2000), ME Sharpe
- Ijiri, Hidenori, "Sino-Japanese Controversy since the 1972 Diplomatic Normalization", The China Quarterly, 124 (1990)
- Iriye, Akira, "Chinese-Japanese Relations, 1945-90", The China Quarterly, 124 (1990)
- Johnson, Chalmers, "The Patterns of Japanese Relations with China, 1952-1982", Pacific Affairs, 59(3) (1986)
- Lee, Chae-Jin, "The Making of the Sino-Japanese Peace and Friendship Treaty", Pacific Affairs, 52(3) (1979)
- Lind, Jennifer, "Sorry States: Apologies in International Politics" (2008), Cornell Univ. Press
- "外交青書"[URL]
- "2012 ‘外交に関する世論調査’" (2012)[URL]