출판문화의 보급과 텍스트, 저자, 독자, 그리고 독서 관습:경전 읽기와 소설 읽기의 비교 분석을 통하여
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is intended to show how characters of text, author, reader, and the method of reading were changed by the prominent spread of printing culture in China after 16 century, through analyzing the differences between Zhuxi(朱熹)'s canon reading in 12c and Jin-Shengtan(金聖嘆)'s novel reading in 17c. Chinese canon, as the words of the sage had been regarded as sacred and principal texts to readers. So readers were forced to accept the fixed and unified meaning from canon and special commentators played an important role in this field. Zhuxi offered oral and intensive reading method to the readers. These situations reflected the beginning stage of printing culture, or pre-printing culture. On the other hand, printing culture was prominently diffused after 16 century. Chinese vernacular novels were supplied like a great flood. Characters of text, author, reader, and the method of reading were changed on this unprecedented condition. We can find that the method of novel reading was changed gradually during several centuries, from oral reading to silent and private reading. Authority of novel' author could not be found, because most of them hided as an anonym. So novel reader could have the right to interpret the text variously according to their will and desire. I think that literary field surrounding Chinese vernacular novel after 16 century was based on relatively more personalized society, in comparison with the previous era. I also think that this conditions which was changed in 16-17c showed a transitional stage toward modern Chinese literature. I wish that my discussion is able to help to deepen a bit superficial analysis which has been discussed until now.
Abstract
This paper is intended to show how characters of text, author, reader, and the method of reading were changed by the prominent spread of printing culture in China after 16 century, through analyzing the differences between Zhuxi(朱熹)'s canon reading in 12c and Jin-Shengtan(金聖嘆)'s novel reading in 17c. Chinese canon, as the words of the sage had been regarded as sacred and principal texts to readers. So readers were forced to accept the fixed and unified meaning from canon and special commentators played an important role in this field. Zhuxi offered oral and intensive reading method to the readers. These situations reflected the beginning stage of printing culture, or pre-printing culture. On the other hand, printing culture was prominently diffused after 16 century. Chinese vernacular novels were supplied like a great flood. Characters of text, author, reader, and the method of reading were changed on this unprecedented condition. We can find that the method of novel reading was changed gradually during several centuries, from oral reading to silent and private reading. Authority of novel' author could not be found, because most of them hided as an anonym. So novel reader could have the right to interpret the text variously according to their will and desire. I think that literary field surrounding Chinese vernacular novel after 16 century was based on relatively more personalized society, in comparison with the previous era. I also think that this conditions which was changed in 16-17c showed a transitional stage toward modern Chinese literature. I wish that my discussion is able to help to deepen a bit superficial analysis which has been discussed until now.
참고문헌 (34)
- 노경희, "명말 강남의 출판문화" (2007), 소명출판
- 로제 샤르티에, "읽는다는 것의 역사" (2006), 한국출판마케팅연구소
- 마에다 아이, "일본 근대 독자의 성립" (2003), 이룸
- 文盛哉, "明末 희곡의 출판과 유통― 江南지역의 독서시장을 중심으로 ―", 중국문학, 41, pp.146~164 (2004), 한국중국어문학회
- 朴昭賢, "텍스트의 생산과 인쇄, 그리고 독서 관습의 관계에 대하여 -包公 이야기를 중심으로", 중국소설연구회보, 21(21), pp.255~274 (2005), 한국중국소설학회
- 方正耀, "중국소설비평사략" (1994), 을유문화사
- 송주복, "주자서당은 어떻게 글을 배웠나" (1999), 청계
- 알베르토 망구엘, "독서의 역사" (2000), 세종서적
- 黎靖德, "朱子語類" (2001), 소나무
- 월터 J. 옹, "구술문화와 문자문화" (1995), 문예출판사
- 이기훈, "근대적 독서의 탄생", 역사비평, 62, pp.341~356 (2003), 역사문제연구소
- 이기훈, "독서의 근대, 근대의 독서-1920년대의 책읽기", 역사문제연구, (7) (2001), 역사문제연구소
- 천정환, "1920-30년대 소설 독자의 형성과 분화과정", 역사문제연구, (7) (2001), 역사문제연구소
- 천정환, "근대의 책읽기" (2003), 푸른 역사
- 최형섭, "중국 소설을 통해 본 ‘개인’에 대한 인식의 변화-‘四大奇書’부터 ≪紅樓夢≫까지의 변화를 중심으로", 박사, 중문과, pp.2007
- 洪尙勳, "전통시기 강남지역에서 독서시장의 형성과 변천― 소설 작품의 생산과 유통을 중심으로 ―", 중국문학, 41, pp.129~146 (2004), 한국중국어문학회
- 耿瑛, "近年出版的評書綜述及思考", 中國圖書評論, 4 (1988)
- 譚帆, "中國小說評點硏究" (2001), 華東師範大學出版社
- 黎靖德, "朱子語類·卷十·學四·讀書法上" (1987), 華世出版社
- 王余光, "試論閱讀史硏究", 中学语文教学参考, 2 (2001)
- 王靖宇, "金聖嘆的生平及其文學批評" (2004), 上海古籍出版社
- 李瑞良, "中國古代圖書流通史" (2000), 上海人民出版社
- 李忠明, "17世紀中國通俗小說編年史" (2003), 安徽大學出版社
- 張明仁, "古今名人讀書法" (1970), 臺灣商務印書館
- 蔣方才, "論評書與小說的關係及區別", 湖南師範大學社會科學學報, 28 (1999)
- 章培恒, "中國文學史" (1996), 復旦大學出版社
- 黃霖, "中國歷代小說論著選 上" (2000), 江西人民出版社
- 黃鎭偉, "坊刻本" (2002), 江蘇古籍出版社
- Anne E. McLaren, "Constructing New Reading Publics in Late Ming China in : Printing and Book Culture in Late Imperial China" (2005), Univ. of California Press
- Cynthia J. Brokaw, "Printing and Book Culture in Late Imperial China" (2005), Univ. of California Press
- Lucille Chia, "Printing for Profit: The Commercial Publishers of Jianyang, Fujian(11th-17th Centuries)" (2002), Harvard University Asia Center
- Martin W. Huang, "Author(ity) and Reader in Traditional Chinese Xiaoshuo Commentary", CLEAR, 16 (1994)
- Robert E. Hegel, "Niche Marketing for Late Imperial Fiction in : Printing and Book Culture in Late Imperial China" (2005), Univ. of California Press
- Robert E. Hegel, "Reading Illustrated Fiction in Late Imperial China" (1998), Stanford Univ. Press