본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

일본인 이주민의 운동자기효능감 측정을 위한 도구 고찰

A Literature Review on Exercise Self-Efficacy Instruments for Japanese Immigrants

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류간호학

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify current Japanese version of exercise self-efficacy instruments for measuring the exercise self-efficacy of Japanese immigrants in South Korea and evaluate their measurement properties. Methods: This study used a literature review on the measurement properties of exercise self-efficacy instruments. The PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched from their inception to 19th July 2021 for related articles. Results: Two instruments were identified via the database search. Both were developed based using Bandura’s self-efficacy as the theoretical background. Overall, both instruments appeared to present adequate evidence for internal consistency and structural validity. Hypotheses testing for construct validity was verified for only one instrument. However, the test-retest lacked evidence for adequacy concerning the time interval. More importantly, content validity was not evaluated during the development of either instruments. Conclusion: We could not identify an instrument with sufficient validity and reliability to measure the exercise self-efficacy of Japanese immigrants in South Korea. In the future, the content validity of the two identified instruments must be evaluated by an expert panel and for and by the target population.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify current Japanese version of exercise self-efficacy instruments for measuring the exercise self-efficacy of Japanese immigrants in South Korea and evaluate their measurement properties. Methods: This study used a literature review on the measurement properties of exercise self-efficacy instruments. The PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched from their inception to 19th July 2021 for related articles. Results: Two instruments were identified via the database search. Both were developed based using Bandura’s self-efficacy as the theoretical background. Overall, both instruments appeared to present adequate evidence for internal consistency and structural validity. Hypotheses testing for construct validity was verified for only one instrument. However, the test-retest lacked evidence for adequacy concerning the time interval. More importantly, content validity was not evaluated during the development of either instruments. Conclusion: We could not identify an instrument with sufficient validity and reliability to measure the exercise self-efficacy of Japanese immigrants in South Korea. In the future, the content validity of the two identified instruments must be evaluated by an expert panel and for and by the target population.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Carl J. Lavie, "Sedentary Behavior, Exercise, and Cardiovascular Health", Circulation Research, 124(5), pp.799~815 (2019), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
  2. Tessa Strain, "Use of the prevented fraction for the population to determine deaths averted by existing prevalence of physical activity: a descriptive study", The Lancet Global Health, 8(7), pp.e920~e930 (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  3. Pedro C Hallal, "Physical activity: moving from words to action", The Lancet Global Health, 8(7), pp.e867~e868 (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  4. Asami K, "Factors influencing quality of life in middle-aged Japanese immigrant women", masters, pp.2018
  5. "Result of 2020 population and housing census" (2021)[URL]
  6. "Korean national survey of multicultural families" (2019)[URL]
  7. "A study of the 2018 national multicultural family survey" (2019)[URL]
  8. "Korean national health &nutrition examination survey" (2018)[URL]
  9. Ding Ding, "Towards better evidence-informed global action: lessons learnt from the Lancet series and recent developments in physical activity and public health", British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(8), pp.462~468 (2020), BMJ[DOI]
  10. Chi Pang Wen, "Stressing harms of physical inactivity to promote exercise", The Lancet, 380(9838), pp.192~193 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  11. Geoffrey H. Tison, "Worldwide Effect of COVID-19 on Physical Activity: A Descriptive Study", Annals of Internal Medicine, 173(9), pp.767~770 (2020), American College of Physicians[DOI]
  12. Albert Bandura, "Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.", Psychological Review, 84(2), pp.191~215 (1977), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  13. Bandura A., "Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents", pp.307~337 (2006), Information Age Pub
  14. Bess H. Marcus, "Self-Efficacy and the Stages of Exercise Behavior Change", Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63(1), pp.60~66 (1992), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  15. Barbara Resnick, "Testing the Reliability and Validity of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale", Nursing Research, 49(3), pp.154~159 (2000), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
  16. Sallis JF, "The development of self-efficacy scales for healthrelated diet and exercise behaviors", Health Education Research, 3(3), pp.283~292 (1988)[DOI]
  17. Shin Y, "Psychometric evaluation of the exercise self-efficacy scale among Korean adults with chronic diseases", Research in Nursing and Health, 4(1), pp.68~76 (2001)[DOI]
  18. Mona Choi, "Psychometric evaluation of the Korean Version of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale for older adults", Geriatric Nursing, 36(4), pp.301~305 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  19. 이은현, "측정도구의 심리계량적 속성 1: 내용타당도", 여성건강간호학회지, 27(1), pp.10~13 (2021), 한국여성건강간호학회[DOI]
  20. Cecilia A. C. Prinsen, "How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline", Trials, 17(1) (2016), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  21. Jiyeon Lee, "Patient-reported outcome measures for diabetes self-care: A systematic review of measurement properties", International Journal of Nursing Studies, 105, pp.103498~ (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  22. Jiyeon Lee, "Self‐efficacy instruments for type 2 diabetes self‐care: A systematic review of measurement properties", Journal of Advanced Nursing (2020), Wiley[DOI]
  23. Jiyeon Lee, "Diabetes-related emotional distress instruments: A systematic review of measurement properties", International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(12), pp.1868~1878 (2015), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  24. Caroline B. Terwee, "Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments", Quality of Life Research, 18(8), pp.1115~1123 (2009), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  25. Takashi Muto, "The Development of a Self-efficacy Scale for Exercise Behavior.", The Keio Journal of Medicine, 41(1), pp.21~24 (1992), Keio Journal of Medicine[DOI]
  26. Oka K, "Stages of change for exercise behavior and self-efficacy for exercise among middle-aged adults", Japanese Journal of Public Health, 50(3), pp.208~215 (2003)
  27. Polit DF, "Measurement and the measurement of change: a primer for the health professions" (2016), Wolters Kluwer
  28. 이은현, "Evaluation of Studies on the Measurement Properties of Self-Reported Instruments", Asian Nursing Research, 14(5), pp.267~276 (2020), 한국간호과학회[DOI]
  29. Anja Frei, "Self-efficacy instruments for patients with chronic diseases suffer from methodological limitations - a systematic review", Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7(1) (2009), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)