본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

冊封體制下에서의 ‘國役’ ― 朝鮮王朝 재정시스템의 특징과 관련하여 ―

The Military Service of Joseon Dynasty in Tributary System

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The finance system of Joseon Korea was centralized by the government. The government unified the taxes into lands, like Ming-Ching China. However the central government levied labor power based on military service system. And income of the local government depended on corvée allotted each household using household register. The military service system had continued as a way to minimize public finance, because saving is one of the most important value of Confucianism. The military service system does not make cost in collecting process because taxpayer come and provide labor personally. And it can not be say that the burden of taxpayer of this system is bigger than other system offering real goods. Taxpayer generally had paid to each government ministries personally. After the centralization of the finance system, the sources and tax were gathered to Hojo(戶曹), the central financial ministry and redistributed to other ministries. However levying labor power still could save the cost in collecting and transporting process. Stability and long peace in East Asian countries owed international order based on the tributary system(冊封體制). The national defense expenditures accounted for most of the national finance excluding costs royal protocols. But the Joseon dynasty under the proclaiming system could not retain own armed forces. That is because the country of emperor(天子) could maintain military system and mobilize the forces. It seems that the national defense of the Joseon dynasty depended on the two; guard mounting peasants patrol the capital, and the tributary system. In this system, the emperor had duty and right to defense a tributary state with his armed forces. In this ways, the Joseon dynasty could save autonomously national defense expenditures and realize ideology of the Confucianism which emphasize saving resources.

Abstract

The finance system of Joseon Korea was centralized by the government. The government unified the taxes into lands, like Ming-Ching China. However the central government levied labor power based on military service system. And income of the local government depended on corvée allotted each household using household register. The military service system had continued as a way to minimize public finance, because saving is one of the most important value of Confucianism. The military service system does not make cost in collecting process because taxpayer come and provide labor personally. And it can not be say that the burden of taxpayer of this system is bigger than other system offering real goods. Taxpayer generally had paid to each government ministries personally. After the centralization of the finance system, the sources and tax were gathered to Hojo(戶曹), the central financial ministry and redistributed to other ministries. However levying labor power still could save the cost in collecting and transporting process. Stability and long peace in East Asian countries owed international order based on the tributary system(冊封體制). The national defense expenditures accounted for most of the national finance excluding costs royal protocols. But the Joseon dynasty under the proclaiming system could not retain own armed forces. That is because the country of emperor(天子) could maintain military system and mobilize the forces. It seems that the national defense of the Joseon dynasty depended on the two; guard mounting peasants patrol the capital, and the tributary system. In this system, the emperor had duty and right to defense a tributary state with his armed forces. In this ways, the Joseon dynasty could save autonomously national defense expenditures and realize ideology of the Confucianism which emphasize saving resources.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 미야지마 히로시, "동아시아는 몇 시인가? : 동아시아의 새로운 이해를 찾아서" (2015), 너머북스
  2. 손병규, "조선왕조 재정시스템의 재발견 - 17~19세기 지방재정사 연구" (2008), 역사비평사
  3. 江戶文化歷史檢定會, "江戶博覽强記" (2013), 小學館
  4. 飯島千秋, "江戸幕府財政の研究" (2004), 吉川弘文館
  5. 速水 融, "歷史人口學の世界" (1997), 岩波書店
  6. 岩井茂樹, "中國近世財政史の硏究" (2004), 京都大學學術出版會
  7. K. Pomerantz, "大分岐――中国、ヨーロッパ、そして近代世界経済の形成" (2015), 名古屋大学出版会
  8. 고은미, "동아시아연구, 어떻게 할 것인가" (2016), 성균관대학교출판부
  9. 권기중, "『부역실총』에 기재된 지방재정의 위상", 역사와 현실, (70), pp.89~110 (2008), 한국역사연구회
  10. 권내현, "17세기 후반~18세기 전반 조선의 은 유통", 역사학보, (221), pp.3~31 (2014), 역사학회
  11. 김영진, "전통 동아시아 국제질서 개념으로서 조공체제에 대한 비판적 고찰", 한국정치외교사논총, 38(1), pp.249~279 (2016), 한국정치외교사학회
  12. 김재호, "조선후기 재정과 시장: 경제체제론의 접근" (2010), 서울대학교출판문화원
  13. 배항섭, "동아시아사 연구의 시각―서구·근대 중심주의 비판과 극복", 역사비평, (109), pp.146~181 (2014), 역사문제연구소
  14. 손병규, "조선후기 재정구조와 지방재정운영 ― 재정 중앙집권화와의 관계―", 조선시대사학보, (25), pp.117~144 (2003), 조선시대사학회
  15. 손병규, "조선후기 국가재원의 지역적 분배 - 『부역실총(賦役實摠)』의 상하납(上下納) 세물을 중심으로 -", 역사와 현실, (70), pp.57~87 (2008), 한국역사연구회
  16. 손병규, "특집2논문: 조선후기 비총제(比摠制) 재정의 비교사적 검토-조선의『부역실총(賦役實摠)』과 명·청(明·淸)의『부역전서(賦役全書)』-", 역사와 현실, (81), pp.213~250 (2011), 한국역사연구회
  17. 송양섭, "『부역실총』에 나타난 재원파악 방식과 재정정책", 역사와 현실, (70), pp.27~56 (2008), 한국역사연구회
  18. 피터윤, "서구 학계 조공제도 이론의 중국 중심적 문화론 비판", 아세아연구, 45(3), pp.269~290 (2002), 아세아문제연구소
  19. 윤영인, "10-13세기 동북아시아 多元的 國際秩序에서의 冊封과 盟約", 동양사학연구, (101), pp.187~224 (2007), 동양사학회
  20. 大口勇次郞, "日本經濟史2; 近代成長の胎動" (1990), 岩波書店
  21. 藤井讓治, "アジアのなかの日本史;Ⅰアジアと日本" (1992), 東京大學出版會
  22. 浜下武志, "近代中國の國際的契機" (1990), 東京大學出版會
  23. 梁方仲, "明代一條鞭法年表", 嶺南學報, 12(1) (1952)
  24. 朝尾直弘, "日本近世史の自立" (1989), 校倉書房
  25. 鳥海靖, "日本近代史" (1992), 放送大學敎育振興會
  26. 권내현, "CHOSŎN KOREA’S TRADE WITH QING CHINA AND THE CIRCULATION OF SILVER", Acta Koreana, 18(1), pp.163~185 (2015), 한국학연구원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)