On the nature of the restrictions for Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I discuss two different approaches to the Characteristic Property Condition for Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean, i.e., the interpretive approach and the processing approach. Assuming that the CPC is the ultimate condition for MSCs, the former claims that the CPC holds due to the special interpretive properties of SpecIP in Korean while according to the latter, the CPC is a processing restriction for filler-gap constructions incurring heavy processing loads. In this paper, I provide four arguments for the latter: (i) the processing approach can better explain the sub-restrictions figuring in the CPC; (ii) the processing approach can better explain the cumulative nature of the sub-restrictions figuring in the CPC; (iii) the processing approach can better explain the fact that the CPC holds for various filler-gap constructions in Korean other than MSCs; (iv) the processing approach can better explain the fact that the CPC also holds for filler-gap constructions in languages like English which lack pro. One syntactic implication of my claim is that simply appealing to the availability of base-generated pro chains cannot be an answer for the absence of island effects observed in many constructions in Korean including MSCs.
Abstract
In this paper, I discuss two different approaches to the Characteristic Property Condition for Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean, i.e., the interpretive approach and the processing approach. Assuming that the CPC is the ultimate condition for MSCs, the former claims that the CPC holds due to the special interpretive properties of SpecIP in Korean while according to the latter, the CPC is a processing restriction for filler-gap constructions incurring heavy processing loads. In this paper, I provide four arguments for the latter: (i) the processing approach can better explain the sub-restrictions figuring in the CPC; (ii) the processing approach can better explain the cumulative nature of the sub-restrictions figuring in the CPC; (iii) the processing approach can better explain the fact that the CPC holds for various filler-gap constructions in Korean other than MSCs; (iv) the processing approach can better explain the fact that the CPC also holds for filler-gap constructions in languages like English which lack pro. One syntactic implication of my claim is that simply appealing to the availability of base-generated pro chains cannot be an answer for the absence of island effects observed in many constructions in Korean including MSCs.
참고문헌 (30)
- Baker, Mark, "Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing" (1988), University of Chicago Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "A festschrift for Morris Halle", pp.232~286 (1973), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Diesing, Molly, "Bare plural subjects and the stage", individual contrast, 1988, 88~42
- Dowty, David, "Themaitc proto-roles and argument selection", Language, 67, pp.547~619 (1991)
- Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, "More on extractability from quasi-NPs", Linguistic Inquiry, 12, pp.665~670 (1981)
- Grimshaw, Jane, "Argument structure" (1990), MIT Press
- Han, Chung-Hye, "Are there 'double relative clauses' in Korean", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.315~337 (2004)
- Han, Jong-Im, "Syntactic movement analysis of Korean relativization", Language Research, 28, pp.335~357 (1992)
- Heycock, Caroline, "Categorical subjects", Gengo Kenkyu, 123, pp.95~135 (2003)
- Jackendoff, Ray, "Semantic structures" (1990), MIT-Press
- Jang, Young-Jun, "Multiple subjects and characteristic property", Discourse and Cognition, 5, pp.99~116 (1998)
- 김일규, "An experimental study on island effects related to“double relative clauses” in Korean", 언어연구, 34(3), pp.191~214 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 김종복, "Parsing Two Types of Multiple Nominative Constructions: A Constructional Approach", 언어와 정보, 11(1), pp.25~38 (2007), 한국언어정보학회
- Kluender, Robert, "Island constraint", pp.223~258 (1992), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Kuno, Susumu, "The structure of the Japanese language" (1973), MIT-Press
- Kuno, Susumu, "Subject and topic", pp.418~444 (1976), Academic Press
- Kuno, Susumu, "Functional syntax" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Kuroda, Sige-Yuki, "The categorical and the thetic judgment", Foundations of Language, 9, pp.153~185 (1972)
- Ladusaw, William A, "Proceedings of SALT-IV", pp.220~229 (1994), CLC Publications
- Rizzi, Luigi, "Relativized minimality" (1990), MIT Press
- Ross, J. Robert, "Infinite syntax" (1986), Ablex Publishing
- Suh, Sungki, "The distribution of topic- and nominative-marked phrases in Korean:The universality of IP structure", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 16, pp.278~298 (1992)
- Sungki Suh, "The Distribution of Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean", 어학연구, 39(4), pp.839~857 (2003), 언어교육원
- Yoon, James, H, "Some queries concerning the syntax of multiple subject constructions in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 2, pp.138~162 (1987)
- Yoon, James, H, "The independence of grammatical case from interpretive factors", paper presented at the 2004 Linguistic Society of Korean International Conference (2004)
- Yoon, James H, "Raising of major arguments in Korean and Japanese", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, pp.615~653 (2007)
- Yoon, Jeong-Me, "ECM and multiple subject constructions in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 3, pp.369~382 (1989)
- 윤정미, "Aspect and Agentivity in Korean Multiple Subject Constructions", 생성문법연구, 19(2), pp.211~237 (2009), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 윤정미, "Double Relativization in Korean - An Explanation Based on the Processing Approach to Island Effects", 언어, 36(1), pp.157~193 (2011), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 윤정미, "Constructions Sharing Similar Restrictions with MSCs in Korean and the Processing Approach to Island Effects", 생성문법연구, 25(2), pp.377~411 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]