매체와 언어 요인이 사전의 효용성에 미치는 영향
Impact of media and language factors on the efficacy of dictionary use
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The ever-increasing use of the internet has resulted in the development of various types of sophisticated web-based dictionaries while diminishing the use of paper-based dictionaries. Still in question, however, is the efficacy of different types of media among learners of different proficiency or cognitive/education levels. This efficacy issue pertaining to the media factor remains intertwined with the language factor (monolingual vs. bilingual), given the contradictory perspective on the overall usefulness among different proficiency levels. This study attempts to 1) investigate the extent to which the media factor interacts with the language factor in terms of the efficacy of dictionary use, 2) compare the efficacy of four different types of dictionaries between two groups of different educational levels, and 3) conduct a survey to explore learners’ views on the proper use of a dictionary. The research findings reveal that strong interactions exist between the media and language factors, and that secondary education learners find the paper-based Korean-English dictionary the most facilitative, whereas the web-based English-English dictionary is the most effective for the tertiary education group. Based on the survey results, the majority of respondents prefer to use web-based dictionaries due to its user-friendliness despite the fairly high efficacy of paper-based dictionaries.
Abstract
The ever-increasing use of the internet has resulted in the development of various types of sophisticated web-based dictionaries while diminishing the use of paper-based dictionaries. Still in question, however, is the efficacy of different types of media among learners of different proficiency or cognitive/education levels. This efficacy issue pertaining to the media factor remains intertwined with the language factor (monolingual vs. bilingual), given the contradictory perspective on the overall usefulness among different proficiency levels. This study attempts to 1) investigate the extent to which the media factor interacts with the language factor in terms of the efficacy of dictionary use, 2) compare the efficacy of four different types of dictionaries between two groups of different educational levels, and 3) conduct a survey to explore learners’ views on the proper use of a dictionary. The research findings reveal that strong interactions exist between the media and language factors, and that secondary education learners find the paper-based Korean-English dictionary the most facilitative, whereas the web-based English-English dictionary is the most effective for the tertiary education group. Based on the survey results, the majority of respondents prefer to use web-based dictionaries due to its user-friendliness despite the fairly high efficacy of paper-based dictionaries.
참고문헌 (31)
- 박희수, "(A)Korean-English dictionary:Its influence on Korean learners of English", 석사, TESOL, pp.2004
- 손봉희, "한국 대학생들의 인터넷 영어 사전 사용 실태 분석", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2008
- 이주령, "한국 고등학생들의 전자사전과 종이사전 사용의 어휘학습 효과 연구", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2008
- 최인철, "음성인식기와 이중언어기반 평가방식의 외국어 습득 효용성", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 10(3), pp.203~219 (2007), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회
- Baker, C., "Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism" (2001), Multilingual Matters
- Brown, D., "Principles of language learning and teaching" (2007), Addison-Wesley Longman Inc
- Chi, M. L. A., "An empirical study of the efficacy of integrating the teaching of dictionary use into a tertiary English curriculum in Hong Kong. Hong" (2003), Language Centre, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
- Dziemianko, A., "Paper or electronic? The role of dictionary form in language reception, production and the retention of meaning and collocations", International Journal of Lexicography, 23(3), pp.257~273 (2010)
- East, M., "The impact of dictionaries on lexical sophistication and lexical accuracy in tests of L2 writing proficiency: A quantitative analysis", Assessing Writing, 11, pp.179~197 (2006)
- Engber, C. A., "The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(2), pp.139~155 (1995)
- Greene, J. P., "A meta-analysis of the Rossell and Baker review of bilingual education research", Bilingual Research Journal, 21, pp.103~122 (1997)
- Gomez, L., "Dual language education: A promising 50-50 model", The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education, 29(1), pp.145~164 (2005)
- Hamayan, E., "Dual language instruction from A to Z : practical guidance for teachers and administrators" (2013), Heinemann, Inc
- Hayati, A. M., "A comparative study of using bilingual and monolingual dictionaries in reading comprehension of intermediate EFL students", The Reading Matrix, 5(2), pp.331~353 (2005)
- Jo, M. Y., "A critical analysis of Korean-English dictionaries for productive use by Korean EFL learners", 박사, pp.2001
- Knight, S., "Dictionary use while reading: The effects on comprehension and vocabulary acquisition for students of different verbal abilities", The Modern Language Journal, 78, pp.285~299 (1994)
- Lindholm-Leary, K. J., "Dual-language education" (2001), Multilingual Matters
- Laufer, B., "The contribution of dictionary use to the production and retention of collocations in a second language", International Journal of Lexicography, 24(1), pp.29~49 (2011)
- Laufer, B., "Examining the effectiveness of ‘bilingual dictionary plus’ a dictionary for production in a foreign language", International Journal of Lexicography, 19, pp.136~155 (2006)
- Luppescu, S., "Reading, dictionaries, and vocabulary learning", Language learning, 43(2), pp.263~279 (1993)
- Martin, S. E., "Selection and presentation of ready equivalents in a translation dictionary, In Problems in lexicography", pp.153~160 (1975), Indiana University
- Martin, R., "One benefit of monolingual dictionaries in the writing classroom", TESL Journal, 12(1), pp.8~20 (2002)
- Ramirez, J. D., "Final report: Longitudinal study of structured English immersion strategy, early-exit and late-exit transitional bilingual education programs for language minority children" (1991), Aguirre International
- Roohani, A., "An investigation into bilingual dictionary use: Do the frequency of use and type of dictionary make a difference in L2 writing performance?", Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 3(2), pp.85~106 (2011)
- 유제선, "Dictionary Use by Korean EFL College Students", 언어와 정보 사회, 7, pp.67~96 (2006), 언어정보연구소
- Thompson, G., "Interaction in academic writing : Learning to argue with the reader", Applied Linguistics, 22(1), pp.58~78 (1987)
- Thomas, W. P., "Two Languages are Better than One", Educational Leadership, 55(4), pp.23~26 (1997)
- Thomas, W. P., "The multiple benefits of dual language", Educational Leadership, 61(2), pp.61~64 (2003)
- Thomas, W. P., "Dual language education for a transformed world" (2012), Fuente Press
- Wingate, U., "Dictionary use-the need to teach strategies", Language Learning Journal, 29, pp.5~11 (2004)
- Zelasko, N., "The benefits of bilingualism", American Language Review, 2(3), pp.11~14 (1998)