Development of a Korean Culture-Friendly Olfactory Function Test and Optimization of a Diagnostic Cutoff Value
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives. Cultural familiarity and safety must be considered when assessing olfactory ability. The YSK olfactory function (YOF) test is a new olfactory function test using culturally familiar odorants to Koreans. Methods. The YOF test comprises three subtests for threshold (T), discrimination (D), and identification (I). The identification test included eight universal and four Korean culture-friendly odorants, which were selected considering eight major functional groups. Data were obtained from 1,127 subjects over 19 years old. Subjects were classified as having normosmia (n=542), hyposmia (n=472), and anosmia (n=113) by self-reported olfactory function. The YOF test and the Korean version of the Sniffin’ stick test (KVSS-II) were performed on the same day in random order. Diagnostic cutoffs for anosmia and hyposmia were calculated using the Youden index (J). Results. The mean values for each T/D/I subtest and the total TDI score were as follows: normosmia (T, 4.6±2.3; D, 8.6±2.1; I, 11.1±1.7; TDI score, 24.2±4.5); hyposmia (T, 3.3±2.2; D, 7.1±2.5; I, 9.2±3.1; TDI score, 19.5±6.4); and anosmia (T, 1.7±1.2; D, 5.1±2.5; I, 5.0±3.2; TDI score, 11.8±5.6). The correlation coefficients between the YOF test and KVSS-II were 0.57, 0.65, 0.80, and 0.86 for T, D, I, and the TDI score, respectively (P<0.001). The diagnostic cutoffs were a TDI score ≤14.5 (J=0.67) for anosmia and 14.5<TDI score ≤21.0 (J=0.38) for hyposmia. The diagnostic efficacy of the YOF test (area under the curve [AUC], 0.88) was equivalent to that of the KVSS-II (AUC, 0.88; P=0.843; DeLong method). Conclusion. The YOF test is a new olfactory test using safe and Korean culture-friendly odorants. It showed equivalent validity with the conventional olfactory function test. Furthermore, the YOF test provides information on the major functional groups of odorants, potentially enabling a more comprehensive interpretation for patients with olfactory disorders.
Abstract
Objectives. Cultural familiarity and safety must be considered when assessing olfactory ability. The YSK olfactory function (YOF) test is a new olfactory function test using culturally familiar odorants to Koreans. Methods. The YOF test comprises three subtests for threshold (T), discrimination (D), and identification (I). The identification test included eight universal and four Korean culture-friendly odorants, which were selected considering eight major functional groups. Data were obtained from 1,127 subjects over 19 years old. Subjects were classified as having normosmia (n=542), hyposmia (n=472), and anosmia (n=113) by self-reported olfactory function. The YOF test and the Korean version of the Sniffin’ stick test (KVSS-II) were performed on the same day in random order. Diagnostic cutoffs for anosmia and hyposmia were calculated using the Youden index (J). Results. The mean values for each T/D/I subtest and the total TDI score were as follows: normosmia (T, 4.6±2.3; D, 8.6±2.1; I, 11.1±1.7; TDI score, 24.2±4.5); hyposmia (T, 3.3±2.2; D, 7.1±2.5; I, 9.2±3.1; TDI score, 19.5±6.4); and anosmia (T, 1.7±1.2; D, 5.1±2.5; I, 5.0±3.2; TDI score, 11.8±5.6). The correlation coefficients between the YOF test and KVSS-II were 0.57, 0.65, 0.80, and 0.86 for T, D, I, and the TDI score, respectively (P<0.001). The diagnostic cutoffs were a TDI score ≤14.5 (J=0.67) for anosmia and 14.5<TDI score ≤21.0 (J=0.38) for hyposmia. The diagnostic efficacy of the YOF test (area under the curve [AUC], 0.88) was equivalent to that of the KVSS-II (AUC, 0.88; P=0.843; DeLong method). Conclusion. The YOF test is a new olfactory test using safe and Korean culture-friendly odorants. It showed equivalent validity with the conventional olfactory function test. Furthermore, the YOF test provides information on the major functional groups of odorants, potentially enabling a more comprehensive interpretation for patients with olfactory disorders.
참고문헌 (38)
- Blomqvist EH, "Consequences of olfactory loss and adopted coping strategies", Rhinology, 42(4), pp.189~194 (2004)
- Asahina K, "The survival advantage of olfaction in a competitive environment", Curr Biol, 18(15), pp.1153~1155 (2008)
- Berendse HW, "Detection of preclinical Parkinson’s disease along the olfactory trac(t)", J Neural Transm Suppl, (70), pp.321~325 (2006)
- Jung HJ, "Olfactory function in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease : a meta-analysis", Laryngoscope, 129(2), pp.362~369 (2019)
- Pause BM, "Reduced olfactory performance in patients with major depression", J Psychiatr Res, 35(5), pp.271~277 (2001)
- Hedner M, "Cognitive factors in odor detection, odor discrimination, and odor identification tasks", J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 32(10), pp.1062~1067 (2010)
- Hsieh JW, "SMELL-S and SMELL-R : olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience", Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 114(43), pp.11275~11284 (2017)
- Hummel T, "Position paper on olfactory dysfunction", Rhinology, 56(1), pp.1~30 (2016)
- Doty RL, "Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles : psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans", Physiol Behav, 20(2), pp.175~185 (1978)
- Doty RL, "Tests of human olfactory function : principal components analysis suggests that most measure a common source of variance", Percept Psychophys, 56(6), pp.701~707 (1994)
- Rospars JP, "Interactions of odorants with olfactory receptors and other preprocessing mechanisms: how complex and difficult to predict?", Chem Senses, 38(4), pp.283~287 (2013)
- Hong SC, "Development of KVSS test(Korean version of Sniffin’ Sticks Test)", Korean J Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg, 42(7), pp.855~860 (1999)
- Hummel T, "‘Sniffin’ sticks’ : olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold", Chem Senses, 22(1), pp.39~52 (1997)
- 홍성문, "Relationship between the Korean Version of the Sniffin’ Stick Test and the T&T Olfactometer in the Korean Population", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 4(4), pp.184~187 (2011), 대한이비인후과학회
- Cho JH, "The Korean version of the Sniffin’ stick(KVSS)test and its validity in comparison with the cross-cultural smell identification test(CC-SIT)", Auris Nasus Larynx, 36(3), pp.280~286 (2009)
- Youden WJ, "Index for rating diagnostic tests", Cancer, 3(1), pp.32~35 (1950)
- DeLong ER, "Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves : a nonparametric approach", Biometrics, 44(3), pp.837~845 (1988)
- Hackett PL, "Teratogenic study of ethylene and propylene oxide and n-butyl acetate" (1982), Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories
- David RM, "Evaluation of subchronic toxicity of n-butyl acetate vapor", Food Chem Toxicol, 39(8), pp.877~886 (2001)
- Saillenfait AM, "Developmental toxic effects of ethylbenzene or toluene alone and in combination with butyl acetate in rats after inhalation exposure", J Appl Toxicol, 27(1), pp.32~42 (2007)
- Bale AS, "An overview of butanol-induced developmental neurotoxicity and the potential mechanisms related to these observed effects", Neurotoxicol Teratol, 53, pp.33~40 (2016)
- Segal D, "Issues in assessing the health risks of n-butanol", J Appl Toxicol, 40(1), pp.72~86 (2020)
- Scognamiglio J, "Fragrance material review on phenylethyl alcohol", Food Chem Toxicol, 2, pp.S224~S239 (2012)
- Jacquot L, "Just noticeable difference in olfaction is related to trigeminal component of odorants", Rhinology, 48(3), pp.281~284 (2010)
- Grabenhorst F, "How pleasant and unpleasant stimuli combine in different brain regions : odor mixtures", J Neurosci, 27(49), pp.13532~13540 (2007)
- Bensafi M, "Autonomic nervous system responses to odours : the role of pleasantness and arousal", Chem Senses, 27(8), pp.703~709 (2002)
- Albrecht J, "Olfactory detection thresholds and pleasantness of a food-related and a non-food odour in hunger and satiety", Rhinology, 47(2), pp.160~165 (2009)
- Doty RL, "An examination of relationships between the pleasantness, intensity, and concentration of 10 odorous stimuli", Percept Psychophys, 17, pp.492~496 (1975)
- 홍성주, "Semantic differential evaluation of n-Butanol odor profile : Suitability as odor intensity reference", 실내환경 및 냄새 학회지, 18(2), pp.102~111 (2019), 한국냄새환경학회[DOI]
- Croy I, "Comparison between odor thresholds for phenyl ethyl alcohol and butanol", Chem Senses, 34(6), pp.523~527 (2009)
- Zernecke R, "Comparison of two different odorants in an olfactory detection threshold test of the Sniffin’ Sticks", Rhinology, 48(3), pp.368~373 (2010)
- Zernecke R, "Correlation analyses of detection thresholds of four different odorants", Rhinology, 49(3), pp.331~336 (2011)
- Tsukatani T, "Detection thresholds for phenyl ethyl alcohol using serial dilutions in different solvents", Chem Senses, 28(1), pp.25~32 (2003)
- Kern DW, "Olfactory thresholds of the U.S. population of home-dwelling older adults: development and validation of a short, reliable measure", PLoS One, 10(3), pp.e0118589~ (2015)
- 김재명, "Olfactory Identification Test Using Familiar Distracters for Koreans", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 7(1), pp.19~23 (2014), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
- Poivet E, "Functional odor classification through a medicinal chemistry approach", Sci Adv, 4(2), pp.eaao6086~ (2018)
- Malnic B, "Combinatorial receptor codes for odors", Cell, 96(5), pp.713~723 (1999)
- Lotsch J, "Different odor tests contribute differently to the evaluation of olfactory loss", Chem Senses, 33(1), pp.17~21 (2008)