강원도 지역 중·고등학교 역사과 평가 실태조사 - 2019학년도 1학기 수행평가 계획서를 중심으로 -

Abstract

This study explored the performance assessment of the history subjects at the local level of Gangwon-do. As for the study method, the assessment plans for the first semester of 2019 of 162 middle schools and 115 high schools were surveyed by complete enumeration. The results of analysis are summarized as follows. First, the guidelines of the Gangwon-do Office of Education were observed in the proportion of performance assessment and the number of evaluation areas. In particular, middle schools were carrying out performance assessments more diversely and actively than the guidelines. Second, differences by grade and subject within school level were not large, but there were differences in rates and methods between middle and high schools. Portfolios were a method that was frequently used in both middle and high schools, but essay writing was more common at high school, while making activities were more common at middle school. Third, the performance assessment in small schools has the advantages that individual students can be identified, that fairness is secured, and that feedback is easy, but it was difficult to confirm whether these advantages actually appeared. In conclusion, it is necessary to support qualitative improvement while supplementing the problems that appear in the assessment plans so that the performance assessment of the history education can be properly carried out at the entire schools.