유스티니아누스 황제의 삼장(tria Capitula)논쟁의 의미
Meanings of the three chapters controversy of Justinian I
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article focus on the Three-Chapter Controversy. The Three Chapters that Emperor Justinian I anathematized were the person and writings of Theodore of Mopsuestia, Certain writings of Theodoret of Cyrus, and the letter of Ibas of Edessa to Maris. Why Justinian I anathematized The Three Chapters? Did he want to have an attempt to reconcile the Non Chalcedonian Christians of Syria and Egypt with the Great Church, following the failure of the Henotikon? Theodora seems to have convinced Justinian that he could easily reconcile the Monophysites to the Church if these three stumbling-blocks were removed. If so it is true, is this attempt only due to any religious causes? I don't think so. I think this attempt due to the variety of reasons. There were political, economic, social, cultural, and racial causes in the Three-Chapter Controversy. I think Justinian I considered these causes in his condemnation to the Three-Chapter. Because he wanted caesarism, and the Three-Chapter was a stumbling block to make his New Empire. The efforts exerted by the Emperor Justinian I in attempting to placate the Monophysites not only failed, but also caused an additional schism in north. The intent behind the condemnation of the Three Chapters was not theological, but political.
Abstract
This article focus on the Three-Chapter Controversy. The Three Chapters that Emperor Justinian I anathematized were the person and writings of Theodore of Mopsuestia, Certain writings of Theodoret of Cyrus, and the letter of Ibas of Edessa to Maris. Why Justinian I anathematized The Three Chapters? Did he want to have an attempt to reconcile the Non Chalcedonian Christians of Syria and Egypt with the Great Church, following the failure of the Henotikon? Theodora seems to have convinced Justinian that he could easily reconcile the Monophysites to the Church if these three stumbling-blocks were removed. If so it is true, is this attempt only due to any religious causes? I don't think so. I think this attempt due to the variety of reasons. There were political, economic, social, cultural, and racial causes in the Three-Chapter Controversy. I think Justinian I considered these causes in his condemnation to the Three-Chapter. Because he wanted caesarism, and the Three-Chapter was a stumbling block to make his New Empire. The efforts exerted by the Emperor Justinian I in attempting to placate the Monophysites not only failed, but also caused an additional schism in north. The intent behind the condemnation of the Three Chapters was not theological, but political.
참고문헌 (63)
- 김차규, "동로마 제국에 있어 로마적 관념론의 존속", 인문과학연구논총, (16), pp.413~435 (1997)
- 김차규, "동로마 황제와 교황선출", 인문과학연구논총, (25), pp.157~176 (2003)
- 김차규, "비잔티움 여성사에 있어 풀케리아 존재의 의미", 서양중세사연구, (29), pp.21~49 (2012), 한국서양중세사학회
- 김차규, "콘스탄티누스의 니케아 공의회 개최의미", 대구사학, 70, pp.157~194 (2003), 대구사학회
- 김차규, "콘스탄티노플 총대주교좌의 위상", 명지사론, 11·12, pp.516~540 (2000)
- 김차규, "콘스탄티누스의 종교정책(312~324) : 종교통합정책", 인문과학연구논총, (20), pp.141~153 (1999)
- 김차규, "테오도시우스 2세의 에페소스 공의회 개최의미", 대구사학, 3(76), pp.337~362 (2004), 대구사학회
- 게오르크 오스트로고르스키, "비잔티움 제국사" (1996), 까치
- I, "교회사II", pp.2013, 에른스트 다스만
- 움베르토 에코, "중세 I" (2015), 시공사
- 워렌 트레드골드, "비잔틴 제국의 역사" (2003), 가람기획
- 후베르트 예딘, "세계공의회사" (2005), 분도출판사
- 후스토 L. 곤잘레스, "중세교회사", 은성출판사
- "Anastasius, Vit. pontif., ed. Rom", ~
- "Athanasius, Histor. ad monachos, PG 25", ~
- "Batiffol, Cathedra Petri, Paris", ~ (1938)
- 1, "Handbuch der Kirchengeschichte, Band II", pp.1975, Baus, Karl
- Brewer, Catherine, "The status of the Jews in Roman Legislation: The Reign of Justinian 527-565 CE", in European Judaism, 38(2), pp.127~139 (2005)
- Brooks, E. W., "Historia ecclesiastica Zachariae Rhetori vulgo adscripta", CSCO syr., ser. III, ~ (1924)
- Browning, R., "Justinian und Theodora. Herrscher in Byzanz", ~ (1988)
- Bury, J. B., "A History of the Later Roman Empire", ~ (1889)
- Camelot, P. -TH., "Éphèse et Chalcédoine, Histoire des Conciles Oecuméniques 2", ~ (1962)
- Chisholm, Hugh, "Encyclopædia Britannica 2" (1911), Cambridge University Press
- Collinet, "Histoire de l'École de droit de Beyrouth", ~ (1925)
- "Cont. Moc in Andrea Gallandi, Bibliotheca veterum patrum antiquorumque scriptorum ecclesiasticorum Græco-Latina", ~
- Paul Krueger, "Corpus iuris civilis Iustiniani, Digesta", ~ (1840)
- Paul Krueger, "Corpus iuris civilis Iustiniani, Codex Justiniani", ~ (1840)
- Theodor Mommsen, "Corpus iuris civilis Iustiniani, Novellae", ~ (1912)
- Davis, Leo Donald, "First seven ecumenical counsils(325-787), their history and theology" (1990), Liturgical Press
- Diehl, Ch., "Justinien et la civilisation byzantine au VIe siècle,", ~ (1901)
- Ducellier, Alain, "L’Église byzantine : Entre Pouvoir et Esprit(313-1204)", ~ (1990)
- Dvornik, François, "Byzance et La Primauté Romaine", ~ (1964)
- "Eusebius, Vita Constantini, PG 20", ~
- "Evagrius, H. E., PG 86", ~
- "Facundus, Pro Defensione Trium Capitulorum, I, 2 ; IV, 4, PL 67", ~
- "Fulgentius Ferrandus, Epistolae et Opuscola, PL 67", ~
- Geanakoplos, Deno J., "Church and State in the Byzantine Empire: A Reconsideration of the Problem of Caesaropapism", Church History, 34(4), pp.381~403 (1965)
- Goodenough, E. R., "The Political Theory of Hellenistic Kingship", Yale Classical Studies I, ~ (1928)
- Gregory of Nazianzus, "Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 7" (1994), Hendrickson
- Hefele, Charles Joseph, "Histoire des Conciles, Tome III, première partie", ~ (1909)
- Herbermann, Charles, "Catholic Encyclopedia" (1913), Robert Appleton Company
- Kaplan, Michel, "La Chrétienté Byzantine : Du début du VIIe siècle au milieu du XIe siècle", SEDES, ~ (1997)
- "Libertatus de Carthage, Breviarium, c. 24, PL 68", ~
- Malalas, Ioan, "Chronographia, XVIII, CSHB(Corpus Scriptorum Historiae Byzantinae)", Bonnae, ~ (1831)
- Marrou, H. J., "Von der Christenverfolgung Diokletians bis zum Tode Gregors des Groβen = Geschichte der Kirche 1", ~ (1963)
- Michel le Syrien, "Chronique IX, 16, éd. J. B. Chabot", ~ (1901)
- Millar, Fergus, "Rome, Constantinople and the Near Eastern Church under Justinian: Two Synodes of C.E. 536", The Journal of Roman Studies, 98, pp.62~82 (2008)
- Murphy, F.-X, "Constantinople II et Constantinople III, Histoire des Conciles Oecuméniques 3", ~ (1973)
- Nicol, D. M., "The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought" (1988), Cambridge
- Pazdernik, Charles, "Justinianic Ideology and the Power of the Past, in The Age of Justinian," (2005), Cambridge University Press
- R. Devreesse, "defensione ; Trium Capitulorum", Studi e Testi
- "Pontianus Africanus Episcopus, Epistola Ad Justinianum Imperatorem, PL 67", ~
- Procopius, Bell, Goth, "Wilhelm Dindorf" (1833), Bonnae
- Procopius, "Buildings" (1940), Loeb Classical Library
- "S. Leonis Magni Tomus ad Flavianum, PL 54", ~
- Shahan, Thomas J, "Catholic Encyclopedia" (1913), Robert Appleton
- "Severus, Sulpicius, Hist. sacra, PL 20", ~
- "Socrates, H. E., II, PG 67", ~
- "Sozomenus, H. E., PG 67", ~
- "Suggestio Diaconi DIOSCORI, CSEL(Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum) 35" (1895), Academiae Litterarum Caesareae Vindobonensis
- Tate, Georges, "Justinien : l’épopée de l’Empire d’Orient, Fayard", ~ (2004)
- "The Catholic Encyclopedia" (1912), Robert Appleton Co
- Zananiri G., "Histoire de l’Église byzantine", ~ (1954)