A356 및 A357 합금으로 용탕단조한 상용차 휠 허브의 미세 조직 및 석출상 변화에 따른 기계적 물성 비교
Comparison of Mechanical Properties According to Changes in the Microstructure and Precipitation Phase of Commercially Vehicle’s Wheel Hubs Molten-forged with A356 and A357 Alloys
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study has related to lightweight automobiles due to global warming with the reduction of fossil fuel reserves are rapidly progressing around the automobile industry. This study has revealed the relationship for the mechanical properties via the analyzed microstructure, precipitated phase variation of the wheel hub of a commercial vehicle manufactured using molten forging technology using A356 and A357 alloys, which are high-strength Al-Si-Mg base cast aluminum alloys. Differential scanning calorimetry has performed to analyze the precipitation amount of each alloy that influences the mechanical properties of aluminum alloy. The XRD analysis has measured for the microstructure's crystal phase on A356 and A357 alloys. In this paper has evaluated to compare the properties of the A356 alloy and the A357 alloy for the mechanical properties. The A356 alloy has confirmed that a microstructure is finer than A357 alloy, and a quantity of precipitated material is more than A357 alloy. Therefore, this study confirmed that the A356 alloy has better mechanical properties than the A357 alloy.
Abstract
This study has related to lightweight automobiles due to global warming with the reduction of fossil fuel reserves are rapidly progressing around the automobile industry. This study has revealed the relationship for the mechanical properties via the analyzed microstructure, precipitated phase variation of the wheel hub of a commercial vehicle manufactured using molten forging technology using A356 and A357 alloys, which are high-strength Al-Si-Mg base cast aluminum alloys. Differential scanning calorimetry has performed to analyze the precipitation amount of each alloy that influences the mechanical properties of aluminum alloy. The XRD analysis has measured for the microstructure's crystal phase on A356 and A357 alloys. In this paper has evaluated to compare the properties of the A356 alloy and the A357 alloy for the mechanical properties. The A356 alloy has confirmed that a microstructure is finer than A357 alloy, and a quantity of precipitated material is more than A357 alloy. Therefore, this study confirmed that the A356 alloy has better mechanical properties than the A357 alloy.
참고문헌 (13)
- Automotive Lightweight Technology Trend and Development Strategy, "S. B. Choi", KISTI, 8~31 (2013)
- 유명한, "AM60 합금 내 MWCNT 용탕 분산처리를 통한 기계적 물성 거동에 관한 연구", 한국기계기술학회지, 18(6), pp.918~923 (2016), 한국기계기술학회[DOI]
- M. S. Moon, "Development of a bus armrest fabrication process with a high-vacuum, high-pressure die-casting process using the AM60 alloy", Robotics and Computer- Integrated Manufacturing, 55(Part B), pp.154~159 (2019)
- 김대환, "A356 알루미늄 합금 슈퍼차저 하우징의 미세조직과 기계적 성질에 미치는 열처리의 영향", 한국주조공학회지, 32(5), pp.231~240 (2012), 한국주조공학회[DOI]
- W. H. Crouse, "Automotive Mechanics", pp.148~160 (1998), McGraw-Hill
- 김선호, "주조용 A356 합금의 인장 및 고주기 피로 특성에 미치는 열처리 영향", 대한금속·재료학회지, 53(2), pp.96~103 (2015), 대한금속·재료학회[DOI]
- Z. W. Chen, "Effect of strontium on primary dendrite and eutectic temperature of A357 aluminum alloy", China Foundry, 7(2), pp.149~152 (2010)
- 김상미, "A356합금을 이용한 정밀주조 Turbo Charger Wheel의 기계적 특성에 미치는 열처리의 영향", 한국주조공학회지, 31(5), pp.262~266 (2011), 한국주조공학회
- 이준영, "A356 합금의 중력 주조", 단조와 Rheo-diecasting, 한국주조공학회지, pp.2013, 33(5)[DOI]
- Q. G. Wang, "Fatigue behavior of A356", 357 aluminum cast alloys. Part II - Effect of microstructural constituents, 2001, pp.1(1), 85~97
- 권혁홍, "자동차용 일체형 유니버셜 샤프트 조인트의 냉간단조 공정 유한요소해석", 한국생산제조학회지, 20(5), pp.582~588 (2011), 한국생산제조학회
- K. T. Kashyap, "Effects and mechanisms of grain refinement in aluminium alloys", Bull. Mater. Sci, 24(4), pp.345~353 (2001)
- 오승환, "AC4A 알루미늄 합금의 주조특성에 미치는 미량 첨가원소의 영향", 한국주조공학회지, 37(5), pp.148~156 (2017), 한국주조공학회[DOI]