본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

近代 中國政治思想史에서 洋務思想 - 사상적 발생기원과 정치적 적용과정을 중심으로

The Conception of Yangwoo in Modern Chinese Political Philosopy History : Focus on the Origin and Perspectives

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

After 1860 a segment of the literati that Chinese was facing a new situation the like of which she had not seenin thousands of years. This situation called change(pien-tung) or turning point. From that time China trying to understand and emulate the West, pragmatic literati-officials had changing conception of the outside world which became sophisticated slowly but steadly. It started with the world-wide geographical study by Wei Yuan in the 1840-50 A. D., and changed to military emulation effort made in the name of Self-strengthening after 1860. After the mid-seventies, however, commerce and industry were emphasized, and Wetern political and educational institutions were discussed by foreign affairs experts. The role did the West play in the Chinese state and society was first assumed its impact could be marginally absorbes into the Chinese polity and social order without changing the fundamental Chinese scheme of things. By 1860 the Westerners were still treated as a nuisance to be brushed off. In the end, however, Western affairs became a focal point of nation-wide concern. Changes in the use of key terms give eloquent testimony to this progress in understanding the West. Affairs in connection with the West were in the main called ‘barbarian affairs(i-wu) before the sixties, Western affairs’(yang-wu) and ‘Western learning(Hsi-hsueh) in the seventies and eighties, and ‘new learning’(hsin-hsueh) in the nineties. The first term was Sino-centric; the second and third were rather neutral in value judgement; while the last unmistakably implied approval. The change in attitude of the some scholar-officials also illustrates this point. The leading advocates of self-strengthening, such as Tseng Kuo-fan, Li Hung-chang and Price Kung were all anti-foreign when they first confronted the Westerners. Their attitude became more and more flexible and relistic as their understanding of the West deepened. In spite of all these changes, the power of conservatism remained strong. Success in the introduction of things Western into China depended in large measure on the extent to whuch they were compatible with this tradition. Accordingly, the armament industry was easily acceptde, yet mining, encountered difficulties. Many literati-officials accepted the yang-wu movement because it was modern, in the hope that it could save China from destruction. But then some rejected it because it was Wester, in the fear that it would replace Confucianism. Faced with the problem of how to save China and at the same time remain Chinese, they held an ambivalent attitude.

Abstract

After 1860 a segment of the literati that Chinese was facing a new situation the like of which she had not seenin thousands of years. This situation called change(pien-tung) or turning point. From that time China trying to understand and emulate the West, pragmatic literati-officials had changing conception of the outside world which became sophisticated slowly but steadly. It started with the world-wide geographical study by Wei Yuan in the 1840-50 A. D., and changed to military emulation effort made in the name of Self-strengthening after 1860. After the mid-seventies, however, commerce and industry were emphasized, and Wetern political and educational institutions were discussed by foreign affairs experts. The role did the West play in the Chinese state and society was first assumed its impact could be marginally absorbes into the Chinese polity and social order without changing the fundamental Chinese scheme of things. By 1860 the Westerners were still treated as a nuisance to be brushed off. In the end, however, Western affairs became a focal point of nation-wide concern. Changes in the use of key terms give eloquent testimony to this progress in understanding the West. Affairs in connection with the West were in the main called ‘barbarian affairs(i-wu) before the sixties, Western affairs’(yang-wu) and ‘Western learning(Hsi-hsueh) in the seventies and eighties, and ‘new learning’(hsin-hsueh) in the nineties. The first term was Sino-centric; the second and third were rather neutral in value judgement; while the last unmistakably implied approval. The change in attitude of the some scholar-officials also illustrates this point. The leading advocates of self-strengthening, such as Tseng Kuo-fan, Li Hung-chang and Price Kung were all anti-foreign when they first confronted the Westerners. Their attitude became more and more flexible and relistic as their understanding of the West deepened. In spite of all these changes, the power of conservatism remained strong. Success in the introduction of things Western into China depended in large measure on the extent to whuch they were compatible with this tradition. Accordingly, the armament industry was easily acceptde, yet mining, encountered difficulties. Many literati-officials accepted the yang-wu movement because it was modern, in the hope that it could save China from destruction. But then some rejected it because it was Wester, in the fear that it would replace Confucianism. Faced with the problem of how to save China and at the same time remain Chinese, they held an ambivalent attitude.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 賈楨, "籌辦夷務始末, (咸豊朝) 卷24" (1979), 中華書局
  2. 姜鐸, "重評洋務運動", 歷史硏究, (2) (1979), 歷史硏究出版社
  3. 高燕寧, "淺析西方資本主義對中國近代社會發展的影響", 遼寧大學學報: 哲社版 (1994)
  4. 金觀濤, "興盛與危機: 論中國社會超穩定結構" (1992), 中文大學出版社
  5. 羅榮渠, "探索近百年中國巨變的脈絡, In 中國現代化問題--一個多方位的歷史探索" (1994), 复旦大學出版社
  6. 羅榮渠, "毛澤東選集", pp.589~ (1964), 人民出版社
  7. 徐泰來, "試論洋務運動的指導思想", 湘潭大學社會科學學報, (4) (1984), 湘潭大學出版社
  8. 蕭一山, "曾國藩傳" (1994), 海南出版社
  9. 孫占元, "洋務運動的指導思想應是 ‘求强’ ‘求富’", 人文雜志, (1) (1991)
  10. 梁啓超, "李鴻章傳" (1994), 海南出版社
  11. 劉沂, "論總理衙門的建立及其歷史地位", 蘇州大學學報: 哲社版 (1991)
  12. 劉熊祥, "論甲午戰爭前官督商辦企業的發展前途與經濟效益", 西北師範學院報, (3) (1986), 社會科學版
  13. 李喜所, "晩淸洋務思潮興起的必然性", 南開學報 (1991)
  14. 丁鳳麟, "薛福成選集" (1979), 人民出版社
  15. 丁偉志, "‘中體西用’論在洋務運動時期的形成與發展", 中國社會科學 (1994)
  16. 趙啓重, "論洋務思想的內部分歧及其分化", 史學集刊 (1991)
  17. 陳旭麓, "論中體西用", 歷史硏究, (5) (1982), 歷史硏究出版社
  18. 夏東元, "鄭觀應集, 盛世危言, 商務(三)" (1982), 上海人民出版社
  19. 夏東元, "論奕訢", 華東師範大學報: 哲社版, (5) (1982)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (31건)