본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

근대 중국 민족주의의 형성과 中華帝國의 전통 - 중국 민족주의의 제국적 기원 -

The Formation of Nationalism and the Tradition of Chinese Empire in Modern China

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The modern theory of Chinese nationalism was not yet appeared until Liang Qichao(梁啓超), an exile in Japan, wrote the famous enlightening essays on the new history and new nation from 1901 to 1902. It was evolved from the ideology of national sovereignty(國權), that was moulded from the traditional ideas and institutions of Chinese Empire, Sino-centric and Confucian culturalistic, under the powerful influence of Western imperialism since two Opium wars(1840~1860) and the Taiping rebellion. Qing(淸) China still maintained to be the old regional empire in East Asia, even if faced with these outer and inner crises, and subordinated to unequal treaty system under the imperialist pressure of western powers. Qing government promoted the self-strengthening reforms in order to remain the imperial sovereignty, and tried to reintegrate the Confucian imperial system, and unify the decentralized government and splitted territory. These Confucian currents to restore the ideological and institutional tradition of the unified empire from the declining tendency of the universal empire, began to emerge through the New Textment school(今文經學), Gong Zizhen(􀕇自珍) and Wei Yuan(魏源), even before the Opium war, and more reinforced by western aggressions. These current thoughts of imperial restoration to reunify and strengthen the declined and disrupted Qing empire were promoted greatly through the suppression of the Taiping rebellion(太 平天國) under the leadership of Zeng Guofan(曾國藩), etc. This anti- Taiping officials and literati were influenced from the prophetic ideas of imperial restoration in the Opium war period, and enforced the Yangwu(洋務) reform. During the Yangwu era, the restoration trend encouraged Qing officials to incorporate the border regions and nations, loosely ruled so far, into China proper, and resist foreign pressure including the criticism on the unequal treaties. These showed the political phases that the idea of national sovereignty rised among some reformists or anti-foreign officials according to the results of Yangwu(洋務) reform. The recover of ritual and legal systems was insisted as the symbol of imperial restoration by all the political factions. However, the results of self-strengthening reforms were limited by the conservative efforts to guard the old polity of Confucian empire, as found in the maritime defense(海防) policy and factional politics in Confucian officialdom. This premodern limits of national sovereignty in the reformed imperial polity would be overcome by the modern reform of national polity, the establishment of modern sovereign state according to the disintegration of Imperial system, which was attempted for the first time by kang Youwei’s(康有爲) party. This modern reform movement would be promoted on the basis of the government by the modern laws, influenced by reformist’s new vision to be adapted for the modern international order among the equal and competitive nation states. In the last phase converting to modern nationalism, Kang’s utopian visions of the world unity, based on the traditional image of universal empire, played the role of urging the absolute equality among states in the current imperialist world. At last, Yang Qichao pursued the great-China nationalism to unify solidly the multination empire inherited from the Qing dinasty under the modern national state, that would be reorganized after the western model of modern imperial nations. And his ideas of great unification and cultural assimilation derived itself in part from the Confucian culturalism in Chinese literati’s tradition of statecraft. The modern China’s nation-state has sustained the efforts to build the great nation to have the structure of empire in itself that reflected the enormous influence of the long Chinese imperial history.

Abstract

The modern theory of Chinese nationalism was not yet appeared until Liang Qichao(梁啓超), an exile in Japan, wrote the famous enlightening essays on the new history and new nation from 1901 to 1902. It was evolved from the ideology of national sovereignty(國權), that was moulded from the traditional ideas and institutions of Chinese Empire, Sino-centric and Confucian culturalistic, under the powerful influence of Western imperialism since two Opium wars(1840~1860) and the Taiping rebellion. Qing(淸) China still maintained to be the old regional empire in East Asia, even if faced with these outer and inner crises, and subordinated to unequal treaty system under the imperialist pressure of western powers. Qing government promoted the self-strengthening reforms in order to remain the imperial sovereignty, and tried to reintegrate the Confucian imperial system, and unify the decentralized government and splitted territory. These Confucian currents to restore the ideological and institutional tradition of the unified empire from the declining tendency of the universal empire, began to emerge through the New Textment school(今文經學), Gong Zizhen(􀕇自珍) and Wei Yuan(魏源), even before the Opium war, and more reinforced by western aggressions. These current thoughts of imperial restoration to reunify and strengthen the declined and disrupted Qing empire were promoted greatly through the suppression of the Taiping rebellion(太 平天國) under the leadership of Zeng Guofan(曾國藩), etc. This anti- Taiping officials and literati were influenced from the prophetic ideas of imperial restoration in the Opium war period, and enforced the Yangwu(洋務) reform. During the Yangwu era, the restoration trend encouraged Qing officials to incorporate the border regions and nations, loosely ruled so far, into China proper, and resist foreign pressure including the criticism on the unequal treaties. These showed the political phases that the idea of national sovereignty rised among some reformists or anti-foreign officials according to the results of Yangwu(洋務) reform. The recover of ritual and legal systems was insisted as the symbol of imperial restoration by all the political factions. However, the results of self-strengthening reforms were limited by the conservative efforts to guard the old polity of Confucian empire, as found in the maritime defense(海防) policy and factional politics in Confucian officialdom. This premodern limits of national sovereignty in the reformed imperial polity would be overcome by the modern reform of national polity, the establishment of modern sovereign state according to the disintegration of Imperial system, which was attempted for the first time by kang Youwei’s(康有爲) party. This modern reform movement would be promoted on the basis of the government by the modern laws, influenced by reformist’s new vision to be adapted for the modern international order among the equal and competitive nation states. In the last phase converting to modern nationalism, Kang’s utopian visions of the world unity, based on the traditional image of universal empire, played the role of urging the absolute equality among states in the current imperialist world. At last, Yang Qichao pursued the great-China nationalism to unify solidly the multination empire inherited from the Qing dinasty under the modern national state, that would be reorganized after the western model of modern imperial nations. And his ideas of great unification and cultural assimilation derived itself in part from the Confucian culturalism in Chinese literati’s tradition of statecraft. The modern China’s nation-state has sustained the efforts to build the great nation to have the structure of empire in itself that reflected the enormous influence of the long Chinese imperial history.

참고문헌 (74)

  1. "革運動의연구", 일조각
  2. 閔斗基, "동아시아의실체와그전망- 역사적접근 in : 시간과의경쟁" (2001), 연세대학교출판부
  3. 曺秉漢, "曾國藩의 經世禮學과 그 역사적 기능-태평천국과 양무운동에 관련하여", 동아문화, 15 (1978)
  4. 曺秉漢, "乾嘉考證學派의體制統合이념과漢宋折衷思潮-阮元·焦循·凌廷堪의古學과實學", 명청사연구, 3 (1994)
  5. 曺秉漢, "鴉片전쟁시기‘저항파’林則徐의개혁사상과淸議", 동아시아역사연구, 1 (1996)
  6. 曺秉漢, "淸乾嘉朝이래의 經世思潮부흥-考證學융성기의 桐城古文派와 常州公羊學", 명청사연구, 6 (1997)
  7. 曺秉漢, "康有爲의초기유토피아관념과中西文化인식-근대개혁이데올로기의탐색", 동양사학연구, 65 (1999)
  8. 曺秉漢, "초기 洋務論의 형성과 上海지역", 중국근현대사연구, 16, pp.1~38 (2002), 중국근현대사학회
  9. 曺秉漢, "梁啓超의국민국가론과民權·民族관념", 西江人文論叢, 22 (2007)
  10. 崔熙在, "1974-5년海防·陸防論의성격", 동양사학연구, 22 (1985)
  11. 崔熙在, "光緖初淸議經世論의발전과그지향", 사학지, 29 (1996), 단국사학회
  12. 崔熙在, "光緖初관료기구의정비와法律行政의정돈", 역사학보, 154 (1997)
  13. 崔熙在, "洋務運動期民族意識발전의一端:同治末光緖初의國權과華僑문제를중심으로", 동양사학연구, 85 (2003)
  14. 康有爲, "日本變政考 in : 康有爲戊戌眞奏議" (1974), 中央硏究院歷史 語言硏究所
  15. 康有爲, "康有爲政論集" (1981), 中華書局
  16. 康有爲, "江南海自編年譜" (1992), 中華書局
  17. 孔令謹, "左宗棠生平及其學行", 左宗棠硏究論文集 (1986)
  18. 孔祥吉, "戊戌維新運動新探" (1988), 湖南人民출판사
  19. 自珍, "定􁟚全集" (1975), 新文豊出版社
  20. 郭松義, "淸代的人口增長和人口流遷" (1984), 中國社會科學院歷史硏究所淸史硏究室
  21. "淸史論叢 제5집", 中華書局
  22. 羅耀九, "張格爾之亂與􀕇自珍的安邊策", 中國史硏究, 47 (1989)
  23. 羅爾綱, "湘軍兵志" (1984), 中華書局
  24. 羅正鈞, "左宗棠年譜" (1982), 岳麓書社
  25. 唐上意, "中法戰爭與張之洞" (2004), 南大學출판사
  26. 梁啓超, "中國積弱溯源論", 陰􁍢室文集, 5 (1960), 中華書局
  27. 梁啓超, "新史學 in: 陰沐室專集 제3책" (1960)
  28. 楊國楨, "林則徐論攷" (1989), 福州
  29. 呂良海, "魏源向西方學習問題的探討-兼與侯外廬同志商", 近代史硏究, 2 (1980)
  30. 寧靖, "鴉片戰爭論文專集" (1990), 續篇
  31. 吳昌綬, "定先生年譜" (1975), 定全集
  32. 吳澤, "魏源‘海國圖志’硏究", 歷史硏究, 4 (1963)
  33. 王家儉, "魏源年譜" (1981), 中央硏究院近代史硏究所
  34. 王春霞, "排滿與民族主義" (2005), 社會科學文獻출판사
  35. 王曉秋, "近代中日關係史硏究" (1997), 中國社會科學출판사
  36. 魏秀梅, "陶澍在江南" (1985), 中央硏究院近代史硏究所
  37. 魏源, "海國圖志" (1847), 成文出版社
  38. 魏源, "魏源集" (1976), 中華書局
  39. 魏源, "聖武記" (1980), 世界書局
  40. 李鴻章, "籌議海防 in : 籌辦夷務始末" (1965), 國風출판사영인본
  41. 李鴻章, "李文忠公全集" (1905), 文海출판사영인본
  42. 莊吉發, "淸高宗十全武功硏究" (1987), 中華書局
  43. 章鳴九, "論李鴻章的變法思想", 歷史硏究, 6 (1989)
  44. 張佩綸, "澗于集 in : 豊澗澗于艸堂" (1917), 文海출판사
  45. 田濤, "國際法輸入與晩淸中國" (2001), 濟南출판사
  46. 左宗棠, "左文襄公全集" (1890), 文海출판사영인본
  47. 朱孔彰, "中興名臣史略" (1969), 華文書局
  48. 中國史學會主, "第二次鴉片戰爭 (四)" (1978), 上海人民출판사
  49. 曾國藩, "曾文正公全集" (1888), 鴻文書局
  50. 秦翰才, "左文襄公在西北" (1984), 長沙
  51. 秦翰才, "左宗棠是樣一個人", 左宗棠硏究論文集 (1986)
  52. 湯志鈞, "戊戌變法史" (1984), 人民출판사
  53. 太平天國歷史博物館, "太平天國文書彙編" (1979), 中華書局
  54. 馮桂芬, "郊􁍗廬抗議" (1897), 聚豊坊校刻
  55. 馮天瑜, "張之洞評傳" (1991), 南京大學출판사
  56. 何烈, "淸咸同時期的財政" (1981), 臺北
  57. 胡濱, "中國近代改良主義思想" (1964), 北京
  58. 洪亮吉, "洪北江詩文集" (1983), 世界書局
  59. 大谷敏夫, "揚州·常州學術考-その社會的關連", 明淸時代の政治と社會 (1983)
  60. 鈴木智夫, "中國における國權主義的外交論の成立", 歷史學硏究, 404 (1974)
  61. 茂木敏夫, "中華帝國の解體と近代的再編成への道 in : アジア史像の新構築" (2002), 靑木書店
  62. 山室信一, "國民帝國論の射程 in : 帝國の硏究-原理·類型·關係" (2004), 名古屋大學出版會
  63. 坂野正高, "總理衙門の設立過程", 近代中國硏究, 3 (1959), 東京大學出版會
  64. 安部健夫, "淸朝と華夷思想 in : 淸代史の硏究" (1971), 創文社
  65. 坂元ひろ子, "中國民族主義の神話-人種·身體·ジェンダ" (2004), 岩波書店
  66. Eastman, Lloyd E., "Throne and Mandarins:China’s Search for a Policy during the Sino-French Controversy" (1880), Harvard University Press
  67. Elman, Benjamin A., "Classicism, Politics, and Kinship:The Ch’angchou School of New Text Confucianism in Late Imperial China" (1984), Harvard University Press
  68. Hsu, Immanuel C.Y., "The Great Policy Debate in China", ~ (1965)
  69. Leonard, Jane K., "Wei Yuan and China’s Rediscovery of the Maritime World" (1984), Harvard University Press
  70. Levenson, Joseph R., "Confucian China and Its Modern Fate" (1968), Berkeley & Los Angeles
  71. Poter, Jonathan, "Tseng Kuo-fan’s Private Bureaucracy, Center for Chinese Studies" (1972), University of California
  72. Shrecker, John, "The Reform Movement, Nationalism and China’s Foreign Policy", Journal of Asian Studies, 24(1) (1969)
  73. Spector, Stanley, "Li Hung-chang and the Huai army:A Study in Nineteenth-Century Chinese Regionalism" (1964), University of Washington Press
  74. Wright, Mary C., "The Last Stand of Chinese Conservatism-The T’ungchih Restoration, 1862-1874" (1957), Stanford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)