본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

돈황변문으로 본 중고(中古)시기 돈황불교의 성격

The Tun-huang Buddhist Character of the Early Middle Age viewed in Tun-huang pien-wen

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Buddhism which was founded in northern India transmitted into China along the two main route of the ancient trade route, the Silk Road. One route is the northern edge of the Taklamakan desert, which is pass through Kashgar, Kuche, Kharashahr, Gaochang. The other route is the southren edge of the Taklamakan desert, which is pass through Kashgar, Khotan, Minfeng, Loulan. Regardless of which route it take, the Buddhism can’t spread into Central China without passing Dunhuang. In this paper, I have discussed about the secularization of Dunhuang Buddhism contained in Bianwen from six aspects. First, a large number of works are based on Indigenous sutras. Second, Buddhist sect is a feature of Chinese Buddhism, but Bianwen was not caught in the Buddhist sect's thoughts. Third, the divining art and idea of topography is used in it. Fourth, the priest who gived a description of the works thoroughly serves to the ruling clique. Fifth, the monks had high interests in the secular music and the writing lyrics, Quzici(曲子詞). Sixth, many works of non-Buddhist Bianwen was transcribed by Buddhist monks.

Abstract

Buddhism which was founded in northern India transmitted into China along the two main route of the ancient trade route, the Silk Road. One route is the northern edge of the Taklamakan desert, which is pass through Kashgar, Kuche, Kharashahr, Gaochang. The other route is the southren edge of the Taklamakan desert, which is pass through Kashgar, Khotan, Minfeng, Loulan. Regardless of which route it take, the Buddhism can’t spread into Central China without passing Dunhuang. In this paper, I have discussed about the secularization of Dunhuang Buddhism contained in Bianwen from six aspects. First, a large number of works are based on Indigenous sutras. Second, Buddhist sect is a feature of Chinese Buddhism, but Bianwen was not caught in the Buddhist sect's thoughts. Third, the divining art and idea of topography is used in it. Fourth, the priest who gived a description of the works thoroughly serves to the ruling clique. Fifth, the monks had high interests in the secular music and the writing lyrics, Quzici(曲子詞). Sixth, many works of non-Buddhist Bianwen was transcribed by Buddhist monks.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 湯用彤, "漢唐佛敎史稿" (1982), 中華書局
  2. 湯用彤, "漢魏兩晉南北朝佛教史" (1991), 上海書店
  3. 殷光明, "敦煌壁畵藝術與疑僞經" (2006), 民族出版社
  4. 季羨林, "敦煌學大辭典" (1998), 上海辭書出版社
  5. Jacques Gernet, "中國五~十世紀的寺院經濟" (1987), 甘肅人民出版社
  6. 郝春文, "唐後期五代宋初敦煌僧尼的社會生活" (1998), 中國社會科學出版社
  7. 張弓, "漢唐佛寺文化史" (1997), 中國社會科學出版社
  8. 中村元等, "中國佛教發展史" (1984), 台北天華出版事業股份有限公司
  9. 薑伯勤, "敦煌藝術宗敎與禮樂文明" (1996), 中國社會科學出版社
  10. 張湧泉, "敦煌變文校注" (1997), 中華書局
  11. 黃正建, "敦煌占卜文書與唐五代占卜研究" (2001), 學苑出版社
  12. 任半塘, "敦煌歌辭總編" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
  13. 竺沙雅章, "征服王朝的時代" (1998), 稻乡出版社
  14. 楊蔭瀏, "中國古代音樂史稿", 丹靑圖書有限公司
  15. 易存國, "敦煌藝術美學" (2005), 上海人民出版社
  16. 竺沙雅章, "征服王朝的時代" (1998), 臺北稻鄉出版社
  17. 施萍婷, "1990年敦煌學國際研討會文集(石窟考古篇)" (1995), 遼寧美術出版社
  18. 王於飛, "舍經入寺與敦煌變文的文學性", 文學評論, (2) (2008)
  19. 史葦湘, "論敦煌佛教藝術的世俗性―兼論<金剛經變>在莫高窟的出現與消失", 敦煌研究, (3) (1985)
  20. 郝春文, "周紹良先生欣開九秩慶壽文集" (1997)
  21. 馬德, "從敦煌看佛教的社會化", 敦煌學輯刊, (4) (2007)
  22. 楊富學, "1998法門寺唐文化國際學術研討會論文集" (2000), 陝西人民出版社
  23. 陳大爲, "論敦煌淨土寺對歸義軍政權承擔的世俗義務", 敦煌硏究, (5) (2006)
  24. 孫修身, "儒釋孝道說的比較研究", 敦煌硏究, (4) (1998)
  25. 鄭阿財, "第二屆國際唐代學術會議論文集 上冊" (1993), 文津出版社
  26. 李正宇, "8至11世紀敦煌僧人從政從軍—敦煌世俗佛教系列研究之七", 敦煌學輯刊, (4) (2007)
  27. 王志鵬, "敦煌佛敎曲子詞之調名源流考辨", 敦煌硏究, (3) (2009)
  28. 鄭炳林, "晩唐五代敦煌三界寺藏經硏究", 西北第二民族學院學報, (2) (2004)
  29. 鄭炳林, "歸義軍時期的敦煌佛敎世俗化槪況", 敦煌學輯刊, (2) (2004)
  30. 湯君, "敦煌燕樂歌舞考略", 文藝硏究, (3) (2002)
  31. 李小榮, "論三敎融合與變文的世俗化", 鹽城師範學院學報: 인문사회과학판, 21(2) (2001)
  32. 楊秀淸, "2005年雲崗國際學術硏討會論文集" (2006), 文物出版社
  33. 鄭炳潤, "敦煌佛敎故事類講唱文學所見淨土宗與禪宗", 敦煌硏究, (2) (1999)
  34. 장원규, "중국불교사" (1989), 고려원
  35. 키무라 키요타카, "중국불교사상사" (1989), 민족사
  36. 법정, "숫타니파타" (2010), 이레
  37. 빅터 메이어, "당대변문" (2012), 소명출판
  38. 이태형, "敦煌曲子詞集" (2011), 학고방
  39. 정승석, "간추린 불교상식 100문 100답" (2004), 민족사
  40. 정병윤, "돈황불교변문과 돈황벽화를 통해 본 중고(中古)시기 돈황의 불교문화", 중국연구, 57, pp.81~119 (2013), 중국연구소
  41. 김민호, "돈황강창사본은 과연 설창예인의 저본이었는가?", 중국소설논총, 6 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)