본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

レトリックの可能性 – 行為の決定におけるパトスの働き –

The Possibility of Rhetoric -Pathos that Works in Decision-Makingin Action-

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

Abstract

This study aims to demonstrate the possibility of rhetoric to deal with two inevitable conundrums in practical reasoning and practical argumentation, the infinite regress problem, and the “Is-Ought” problem. The infinite regress is a problem of an incessant requirement for conceded premises to secure a claim. The “Is-Ought” problem is the alleged impossibility to deduce a prescriptive statement from a descriptive statement. Fairclough, I. and Fairclough, N. (2012b) appear to succeed in disposing of those complications, but their claim is only valid in the realm of social reality that is regulated by normative commitment. The function of emotions in practical reasoning and argumentation is one of such domains that they do not pay due attention to, and that is what this study works on. Consideration of The Awakening of the East written by Okakura Tenshin(1863-1913), where Okakura attempts to win Asian people’s adherence to an idea of renitency against Western powers in the early twentieth century, shows that pathos, or the appeal to emotions plays an appropriate role to help Asian people to approve of an idea that Asia is worthy of being appreciated. This contribution of pathos to persuasion means that pathos makes both practical reasoning and practical argumentation immune to the two enigmas in the case of The Awakening of the East as practical argumentation. This resolution can be attributed to a property of rhetoric of being evocative.

참고문헌 (62)

  1. "アリストテレス全集17 二コマコス倫理学", pp.106~ (2014), 岩波書店
  2. "アリストテレス全集18 弁論術․詩学", pp.22~ (2017), 岩波書店
  3. 伊藤克彦, "価値判断の主体・対象相互依存モデル:一メタ倫理学におけるJ.マクダウェルのJ.L.マッキ一批判と志向性の概念", 一橋法学, 8(2), pp.265~315 (2009)
  4. 鴻浩介, "理由の内在主義と外在主義", 科学哲学, 49(2), pp.27~47 (2016)
  5. "岡倉天心全集1", pp.13~ (1980), 平凡社
  6. サ一ル, J.R., "社会的世界の制作 人間文明の構造", pp.1~318 (2018), 勁草書房
  7. 佐藤節子, "権利の法社会学の可能性-権利の哲学的分析よりの展開", 法社会 学, 41, pp.38~46 (1989)
  8. スミス, A., "ネイションとエスニシティ-歴史社会学的考察", pp.39~40 (1999), 名古屋大学出版会
  9. 筒井昭博, "岡倉天心著『東洋の覚醒』に現れたイデオロギ一-antithesisに基づく談話分析-", 日本研究, 62, pp.333~356 (2014), 韓国外國語大學校 日本研究所
  10. Tsutsui Akihiro, "岡倉天心『東洋の覚醒』における複問の虚偽 -議論学的視点からの談話分析-", 일본언어문화, (46), pp.35~58 (2019), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
  11. Tsutsui Akihiro, "価値としてのアジア -岡倉天心著『東洋の覚醒』の議論学的談話分析-", 일본언어문화, (48), pp.85~109 (2019), 한국일본언어문화학회[DOI]
  12. Tsutsui Akihiro, "議論における合理性と有効性の相克 - 岡倉天心著『東洋の覚醒』における感情への訴え -", 비교일본학, 49, pp.237~262 (2020), 일본학국제비교연구소[DOI]
  13. ペレルマン, Ch, "法律家の論理", 木鐸社, pp.9~ (1986)
  14. 野津悌, "アリストテレスにおける感情と説得『弁論術』における「聴き手に拠る説得」の内実", 西洋古典学研究, 50, pp.24~34 (2002), 日本西洋古典学会
  15. Adoni, H., "Media and the Social Construction of Reality", Communication Research, 11(3), pp.323~340 (1984)
  16. Audi, R., "The Routledge Companion to Ethics", pp.275~285 (2010), Routledge
  17. Baumtrog, M., "Considering the role of values in practical reasoning argumentation evaluation", OSSA Conference Archive, 18, pp.4~ (2013)
  18. Bitzer, L. F, "Aristotle’s Enthymeme Revisited", Quarterly Journal of Speech, 45(4), pp.407~ (1959)
  19. Bitzer, L. F, "The rhetorical situation", Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1, pp.1~14 (1968)
  20. Brinton, A, "Pathos and the Appeal to Emotion: an Aristotelian Analysis", History of Philosophy Quarterly, 5(3), pp.207~219 (1988)
  21. Brinton, A, "Appeal to the Angry Emotions", Informal Logic, 10, pp.77~87 (1988)
  22. Copi, I. M, "Informal Logic", pp.34~ (1989), Macmillan
  23. Damer, T. E, "Attacking Faulty Reasoning, A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments", pp.16~ (2009), Wadsworth
  24. Fairclough, I., "Practical reasoning in political discourse: the UK government's response to the economic crisis in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report", Discourse & Society, 22(3), pp.243~268 (2011)
  25. Fairclough, I., "Exploring Argumentative Contexts", pp.23~42 (2012), John Benjamins
  26. Fairclough, I, "Political Discourse Analysis, A Method for Advanced Students", pp.40~41 (2012), Routledge
  27. Fairclough, N, "Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Policy Studies", Critical Policy Studies, 7, pp.177~197 (2013)
  28. Fairclough, N., "Dialectical reasoning in critical social analysis and critical discourse analysis", ISSA (International Society for the Study of Argumentation) Proceedings, pp.1~ (2014)
  29. Fairclough, N., "Methods of Critical Discourse Studies", pp.86~108 (2016), Sage
  30. Fairclough, N., "A procedural approach to ethical critique in CDA", Critical Discourse Studies, 15(2), pp.169~185 (2018)
  31. Finlayson, A, "From beliefs to arguments : interpretative methodology and rhetorical political analysis’", British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(4), pp.545~563 (2007)
  32. Fischer, F., "The Argumentative Turn Revisited, Public Pollicy as Communicative Practice", pp.10~ (2012), Duke University Press
  33. Gilbert, M.A., "Argumentation in Practice", pp.43~52 (2005), John Benjamins
  34. Gottweis, H., "The Argumentative Turn Revisited, Public Policy as Communicative Practice", pp.211~235 (2012), Duke University Press
  35. Govier, T., "Arguing Forever? Or: Two Tiers of Argument Appraisal", OSSA Conference Archive, 46, pp.1~ (1997)
  36. Govier, T, "Practical Study of Argument", pp.87~88 (2010), Wordsworth
  37. Jørgensen, C, "Interpreting Perelman's Universal Audience, Gross versus Crosswhite", Argumentation, 23, pp.11~19 (2009)
  38. Kock, C, "Is Practical Reasoning Presumptive?", Informal Logic, 27(1), pp.91~108 (2007)
  39. Kock, C, "Choice is Not True or False : The Domain of Rhetorical Argumentation", Argumentation, 23, pp.61~80 (2009)
  40. Kock, C, "Defining Rhetorical Argumentation", Philosophy & Rhetoric, 46(4), pp.437~464 (2013)
  41. Leff, M., "Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis", pp.53~64 (2002), Kluwer Academic
  42. Nienkamp, J., "The Hidden Role of Pathos in Toulmin's Layout of Argument", OSSA Conference Archive, 42, pp.346~355 (2005)
  43. Perelman, Ch, "The New Rhetoric and the Humanities Essays on Rhetoric and its Applications", pp.117~118 (1979), Reidel
  44. Perelman, Ch, "New Rhetoric, A Treatise on Argumentation", pp.19~ (1969), University of Notre Dame Press
  45. Rescher, N., "The Role of Rhetoric in Rational Argumentation", OSSA Conference Archive, 3, pp.4~ (1997)
  46. Robertson, J., "Hume on Practical reasoning", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,New Series, 90, pp.267~282 (1989)
  47. Searle, J. R, "The Construction of Social Reality", pp.1~126 (1995), Free Press
  48. Searle, J. R., "Making the Social World", pp.3~173 (2010), Oxford University Press
  49. Sinnott-Armstrong, W., "Understanding Arguments : An Introduction to Informal Logic Ninth Edition", pp.47~48 (2005), Cengage Learning
  50. Tindale, C. W, "Acts of Arguing, A Rhetorical Model of Argument", pp.1999
  51. Tindale, C. W, "Rhetorical Argumentation, Principles of Theory and Practice", pp.6~7 (2004), Sage
  52. Tindale, C.W., "Argumentation in Practice", pp.29~42 (2005), John Benjamins
  53. Toulmin, S. E, "The Uses of Argument", pp.98~99 (2003), Cambridge University Press
  54. Walton, D, "How to Make and Defend a Proposal in Deliberation Dialogue", Artificial Intelligence and Law, 14, pp.177~239 (2006)
  55. Walton, D, "Evaluating Practical Reasoning", Synthese, 157(2), pp.197~240 (2007)
  56. Walton, D, "Media Argumentation: Dialectic, Persuasion, and Rhetoric", pp.13~ (2007), Cambridge University Press
  57. Walton, D, "Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation", pp.13~14 (2014), Cambridge University Press
  58. Walton, D, "Goal-based Reasoning for Argumentation", pp.3~ (2015), Cambridge University Press
  59. Williams, B., "Reasoning Studies of Human Inference and Its Foundations", pp.60~66 (2008), Cambridge University Press
  60. Wenzel, J.W., "Readings in Argumentation", pp.121~144 (1992), Foris Publications
  61. Zarefsky, D., "President Johnson’s War on Poverty Rhetoric and History", pp.15~16 (1986), The University of Alabama Press
  62. "早稲田キャンパスに杉原千畝レリ一フを設置"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)