Party-list Proportional Representation and Instability of Election System: Comparative Analysis in the Cases of General Election in Thailand and South Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the two recent general election cases in Thailand and South Korea by comparative analysis with the same problematic, controversial issues of proportional representation in the two countries. The election rules based on proportional representation established before the elections were introduced to allow the current political leadership to stay in power. Through the similarities and differences in the two cases, it is argued that proportional representation has been used for political strategy, rather than for reflecting the diversity of society. Accordingly, the institutional reform in election rules signifies a likelihood of continual revisions and struggles.
Abstract
This paper examines the two recent general election cases in Thailand and South Korea by comparative analysis with the same problematic, controversial issues of proportional representation in the two countries. The election rules based on proportional representation established before the elections were introduced to allow the current political leadership to stay in power. Through the similarities and differences in the two cases, it is argued that proportional representation has been used for political strategy, rather than for reflecting the diversity of society. Accordingly, the institutional reform in election rules signifies a likelihood of continual revisions and struggles.
참고문헌 (51)
- 박용찬, "대한민국 국회의원 비례대표 제도에 대한 소고", 서강법률논총, 8(1), pp.187~216 (2019), 법학연구소[DOI]
- "Thai king condemns sister’s bid to be PM" (2019)[URL]
- "Thai Political Party That Nominated King’s Sister Is Dissolved" (2019)[URL]
- 변해철, "태국의 민주화와 1997년 헌법개정", 외법논집, (18), pp.1~25 (2005), 법학연구소
- 장영수, "50%연동형 비례대표제의 헌법적 쟁점", 공법연구, 48(1), pp.221~251 (2019), 한국공법학회[DOI]
- 장영수, "개정 공직선거법에 따른 연동형 비례대표제의 헌법적 문제점", 공법연구, 48(3), pp.167~192 (2020), 한국공법학회[DOI]
- Cincea, E., "Proportionality or majoritarianism? In search of electoral equity", BAJO PALABRA. Revista de Filosofía, 8, pp.175~190 (2013)
- "Thailand’s Constitution of 2017" (2020)[URL]
- "Hints of a royal election deal in Thailand" (2020)[URL]
- Gerven, W., "The European Union" (2005), Amsterdam University Press
- Duverger, M., "Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State" (1959), Methuen & Co.
- Gerven, W., "The European Union" (2005), Amsterdam University Press
- "Thai Opposition Party That Pushed for Democratic Reform Disbanded by Judge" (2020)[URL]
- "Why Thais said yes to new constitution" (2016)[URL]
- "“17억 공천대가 맞다” 양정례 어머니구속영장" (2008)[URL]
- "Thailand: Structural Flaws Subvert Election" (2019)[URL]
- Huntington, S. P., "The Third Wave" (1993), Amsterdam University Press
- "연동형비례제 찬성 국민 66% “지역구 투표가 좋아.”" (2018)[URL]
- "재산신고 92억 원당선인…비결은 명의신탁?" (2020)[URL]
- "불공정 논란 속 팔랑쁘라차랏당 최다 득표 향후연립정부 구성 등 해결해야 할 과제 산적" (2019)[URL]
- "‘4+1 선거법’ 폐기·개정 필요하다" (2020)[URL]
- "여성의원 얼마나 나올까?" (2004)[URL]
- "정개특위, 출범부터 선거법개정안 의결까지" (2019)[URL]
- "연동형 비례대표제 ‘당론’ 문건있는데…“당론 없다”는 민주당" (2018)[URL]
- "그들은 왜 독일식 선거법 도입을주창하는가?" (2015)[URL]
- "총선⑪ 한눈에 일목요연! 20대선거결과 총정리" (2016)[URL]
- "Are the cuts merely cosmetic?" (2019)[URL]
- "S. Korean, Japanese far right exploits Yoon Mee-hyang controversy to rewrite historical narrative" (2020)[URL]
- 이공주, "비례대표 제도와 기본권의 충돌에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (53), pp.133~151 (2014), 한국법학회
- 이공주, "비례대표제의 축소 및 폐지에 관한 연구 – 연동형 비례대표제 도입 논의와 관련하여 –", 헌법학연구, 25(3), pp.39~70 (2019), 한국헌법학회[DOI]
- 이성우, "정치제도의 정치경제적 영향: 정부형태와 선거제도의 조합 효과를 중심으로", 한국정치학회보, 52(2), pp.5~29 (2018), 한국정치학회[DOI]
- "국민 10명 중 7명, “국회의원수 10%확대안 반대.”" (2019)[URL]
- Duncan McCargo, "Thailand in 2016", Asian Survey, 57(1), pp.150~156 (2017), University of California Press[DOI]
- McCargo, D., "Thailand’s 2019 Elections: A State of Democratic Dictatorship?", Asia Policy, 14(4), pp.89~106 (2019)
- "Proportional Representation in Practice: an International Comparison of Ballots and Voting Rules" (2018)[URL]
- "Statistics on China-Thailand Trade in January-December 2018" (2019)[URL]
- Lee Morgenbesser, "Elections as Causes of Democratization: Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective", Comparative Political Studies, 52(1), pp.3~35 (2019), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- (2019)[URL]
- "Productivity slump behind Thailand’s economic woes" (2019)[URL]
- "비례대표 후보공천의실태와 민주적 정당성 강화를 위한 제도적 개선 방안에 대한연구" (2018)[URL]
- 박용수, "한국의 제왕적 대통령론에 대한 비판적 시론: 제도주의적 설명 비판과 편법적 제도운영을 통한 설명", 한국정치연구, 25(2), pp.27~55 (2016), 한국정치연구소[DOI]
- Sargentich, T. O., "The Presidential and Parliamentary Models of National Government", American University International Law Review, 8(2), pp.579~592 (1993)
- "‘비례한국당’ 만든다…위성정당논란에 연비제 흔들" (2019)[URL]
- "역사속으로 사라지는 여야비례위성정당" (2020)[URL]
- "Thailand’s Puzzling 2019 Election: How the NCPO Junta has Embedded itself in Thai Politics" (2019)[URL]
- "The 2007Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand" (2008)[URL]
- "Thailand first-quarter GDP growth slows to weakest in over four years, outlook murky" (2019)[URL]
- Sung, N., "헌법학" (2018), Pŏmmunsa
- Sung, S.-H., "Democracy and Elections: Focusing on Concepts of Democracy and Representative System", The Study of Election, 5, pp.83~113 (2014)
- Tonsakulrungruang, K., "Constitutional Amendment in Thailand:Amending in the Spectre of Parliamentary Dictatorship", Journal of Comparative Law, 14(1), pp.173~187 (2019)
- "사실상 무용지물 선거법, 고칠까? 없앨까?" (2020)[URL]