토마스 아퀴나스 <존재와 본질에 관하여>제4장의 본질-존재함 (esse) 구별 논증의 출발점에 대한 해석의 문제

키워드

참고문헌 (13)

1. Etienne Gilson, "Elements of Christian Philosophy" (1959), Doubleday & Company Inc
2. Francis A, "Essence and Existence in Thomism ? University Press of America" (1988), real distinction
3. John F, "A Reply to Fr Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas Catholic University of America Press", pp.120~132 (1984)
4. "Aquinas's Route to the Real Distinction A Note on De ente et essentia", pp.279~295 (1979)
5. ed, "Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy", pp.385~410 (1982), Cambridge University Press
6. Joseph Bobik, "Aquinas on Being and Essence" (1965), University of Notre Dame Press
7. Joseph Owens, "Aquinas's distinction at De ente et essentia 4", pp.119~123 (1986)
8. Thomas Aquinas, "Quiddity and Real Distinction in St", pp.1~22 (1965)
9. A Rejoinder, "Stages and Distinction in De Ente", pp.99~123 (1981)
10. Kevin J. Caster, "The Distinction Between Being and Essence according to Boethius, Avicenna, and William of Auvergne", 73, pp.309~332 (1996)
11. Leo Sweeney, "Existence", Essence in Thomas Aquinas's Early Writings Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 1963, 97~131
12. Scott Macdonald, "The Esse", Essence Argument in Aquinas's De ente et essentia Journal of History of Philosophy 22, 1984, 157~172
13. 장건익, "토마스 아퀴나스의 De ente et essentia 4장에 나타난 본질-존재 구별 논증의 성격과 의미", 가톨릭철학, (7), pp.387~420 (2005), 한국가톨릭철학회

관련 논문AI추천