The U.S.-Japan Alliance and the Senkaku/Diaoyu Dao Islands Dispute : Is the U.S. a Mediator or Conflict-Inducer?
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There has been continued tension between Japan and China in the East China Sea since 2010. The managing or resolution of the Senkaku/Diaoyu Dao Islands dispute is so critical that many observers have emphasized the importance of the role of the U.S. and have called upon the country to act as a mediator. However, there has been no research on the change in the U.S. stance. Therefore, this study examines the changes in the U.S.’s stance on the Senkaku/Diaoyu Dao Islands dispute by analyzing its position over time. A three-phase analysis of the U.S.’s stance will be examined through the analyzing of the Obama administration. The analysis of various mediums including the statements of high-level policymakers will show that the U.S.’s stance has changed from neutral to intervention and that its support of Japan is becoming increasingly conspicuous. The conclusion will aim to propose the implications this research has for Northeast Asia.
Abstract
There has been continued tension between Japan and China in the East China Sea since 2010. The managing or resolution of the Senkaku/Diaoyu Dao Islands dispute is so critical that many observers have emphasized the importance of the role of the U.S. and have called upon the country to act as a mediator. However, there has been no research on the change in the U.S. stance. Therefore, this study examines the changes in the U.S.’s stance on the Senkaku/Diaoyu Dao Islands dispute by analyzing its position over time. A three-phase analysis of the U.S.’s stance will be examined through the analyzing of the Obama administration. The analysis of various mediums including the statements of high-level policymakers will show that the U.S.’s stance has changed from neutral to intervention and that its support of Japan is becoming increasingly conspicuous. The conclusion will aim to propose the implications this research has for Northeast Asia.
참고문헌 (22)
- Chew, Chee Mun, "China’s Perspective on the major island disputes in the ease and south China seas: Implications for the US’s strategic rebalance toward Asia", pp.2013
- 천자현, "동북아시아 영토 분쟁의 역사성과 미국－중국의 부상과 미국의 변화－", 대한정치학회보, 22(1), pp.87~108 (2014), 대한정치학회
- Senkaku (Diaoyu, "Diaoyutai) Islands Dispute: U.S. Treaty Obligations", Congressional research service, 2013, pp.3~
- "Treaty with Japan Covers Islets in China Spat: U.S. Official" (2012)[URL]
- Lieberthal, Kenneth, "The American Pivot to Asia", Foreign Policy, 21 (2011)
- Pivot to the Pacific? The Obama Administration's Rebalancing Toward Asia, "Manyin, Mark E.", Library of Congress Washington D.C. Congressional Research Service, ~ (2012)
- "Senkaku (Diaoyu/Diaoyutai) Islands Dispute: U.S. Treaty Obligations" (2013)[URL]
- McDevitt, Michael, "The East China Sea: The Place Where Sino–US Conflict Could Occur", American Foreign Policy Interests, 36(2) (2014)
- Mearsheimer, John J., "The gathering storm: China’s challenge to US power in Asia", The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3(4) (2010)
- "White Paper on Diaoyu Dao, an Inherent Territory of China" (2012)[URL]
- "Obama: Senkakus Covered Under US-Japan Security Treaty" (2014)[URL]
- "China Escalates Islands Dispute with Japan" (2013)[URL]
- "Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security Between Japan and the United States of America, Article 5"[URL]
- "U.S. Bill HR4310, 112-239"[URL]
- ロバート·D·エルドリッヂ, "尖閣問題の起源－沖縄返還とアメリカの中立政策" (2015), 名古屋大学出版会
- 郭永虎, "关于中日钓鱼岛争端中 “美国因素” 的历史考察", 中国边疆史地研究, 4 (2005)
- 刘江永, "美国介入钓鱼岛将面临两难困境", 国际问题研究, 3 (2011)
- 侯胜一, "从地缘政治视角看美国高调介入中日钓鱼岛争端", 理论导刊 (2013)
- 卢芳华, "美国 “重返亚洲” 战略与中日钓鱼岛争端", 桂海论丛, 29(4) (2013)
- 廉德瑰, "解析美国在钓鱼岛问题上的立场", 太平洋学报, 21(7) (2013)
- "于青: 日媒报道麻生称钓鱼岛属于日美安保条约对象"[URL]
- "美智库称中国没忘 96 年耻辱 决不让历史重演"[URL]