본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

大江健三郞のロ-マン主義精神と歷史意識 - 『さようなら、私の本よ!』を基軸に -

A study on Oe Kenzaburo's romanticism soul and historical consciousness - “Good-bye my book!” to the base -

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

"Good-bye my book!" (Kodansha 2005.9)It is work where the will to 'Serious Literature' and the romanticism literature of writer Oe that entered the old age appears well with consideration 'the last novel'. The consciousness of feelings the Roman factions intersects with the consciousness of the old age of writer Oe to which it has kept living for many years in this text very through "Good-bye my book!", and it makes sure whether develop with any direction. Moreover, 'Mishima problem' in the work is paid to attention, and it searches for the one that exists in the background of 'The last novel' of Oe and the Roman ideologist declaration. As a result, the creation attitude of Oe that starts approaching the essence of 'Serious Literature' will be clarified. And, how is the relations aspect with coetaneous expressed for the Roman principle spirit in the Oe literature to be made shape in any shape and to succeed the Roman principle literature? How does a Roman principle spirit of the average of Oe synchronize with the problem of perception of history? One interpretation to the doubt will be able to be presented.

Abstract

"Good-bye my book!" (Kodansha 2005.9)It is work where the will to 'Serious Literature' and the romanticism literature of writer Oe that entered the old age appears well with consideration 'the last novel'. The consciousness of feelings the Roman factions intersects with the consciousness of the old age of writer Oe to which it has kept living for many years in this text very through "Good-bye my book!", and it makes sure whether develop with any direction. Moreover, 'Mishima problem' in the work is paid to attention, and it searches for the one that exists in the background of 'The last novel' of Oe and the Roman ideologist declaration. As a result, the creation attitude of Oe that starts approaching the essence of 'Serious Literature' will be clarified. And, how is the relations aspect with coetaneous expressed for the Roman principle spirit in the Oe literature to be made shape in any shape and to succeed the Roman principle literature? How does a Roman principle spirit of the average of Oe synchronize with the problem of perception of history? One interpretation to the doubt will be able to be presented.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. カール, "大久保和郎訳󰡔政治的ロマン主義" (1975), みすず書房
  2. ヴォルフガング, "解釈の射程─<空白>のダイナミクス" (2006), 法政大学出版局
  3. ポール, "ド․マン󰡔ロマン主義のレトリック; 山形和美ほか訳" (1998), 法政大学出版局
  4. 大江健三郎, "われらの狂気を生き延びる道を教えよ" (1975), 新潮社
  5. 大江健三郎, "新しい文学のために" (1988), 岩波書店
  6. 大江健三郎, "最後の小説ー現代日本のエッセイ" (1994), 講談社文芸文庫
  7. 大江健三郎, "私という小説家の作り方" (1998), 新潮社
  8. 平野啓一郎, "ディアローグ" (2007), 講談社
  9. 山内久明ほか, "ヨーロッパ․ロマン主義を読み直す" (1997), 岩波書店
  10. 江藤淳, "青春の荒廃について─純文学論争を截る" (1962), 群像
  11. エドワード, "晩年のスタイルに関する考察" (2005), 高橋洋一訳
  12. 大江健三郎, "戦後文学をどう受けとめたか" (1963), 群像
  13. 大江健三郎, "戦後文学から新しい文化の理論を通過して" (1986), 世界
  14. 大江健三郎, "後期の仕事」に希望がある(か?)" (2005), 新潮
  15. 大江健三郎, "ロング․インタビュー 大江健三郎、語る" (2005), 新潮
  16. 大江健三郎, "二つのカタストロフィと二つの「おかしな二人組」" (2005), 群像
  17. 笠井潔, "大江健三郎について─󰡔終り󰡕の想像力" (1990), 国文学解釈と教材の研究

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)