한일 양국의 영토인식 형성과 교과서 연구 - 일본의 「영토확장주의론」과 한국의 「고유영토 수복주의론」에 관한 고찰 -

Abstract

Korea as specific territory asserts the Dokdo. Japan against the Dokdo is asserting a territory right. The history of the Dokdo without it is incorrect is territory of Korea. Japan poisonous moral history the Korean territory asserts knows as. As Japanese territory it asserts rather with international law. The territory recognition will be different why between Korea and Japan. This research is the research which reveals the difference of territory recognition of Korea and Japan. This research it compared the high school textbook of Korea and the high school textbook of Japan it analyzed. Korea asserts only original it was a stock price specific territory. It loses now and it is a territory which throws away. Korea loses and it searches the territory which throws away. Also the Dokdo is sameness. The Dokdo is original Korean territory. Japan snatches the Dokdo. The Dokdo it does not have taken away absolutely. To be like that and not to abandon the territory main hoisting of the Dokdo. The ancient times Japanese government crosses over from the Korean Peninsula and it is a political power which it builds. It violated the territory of child trouble and it made in territory. It invaded after Ainu that and it made the Japanese archipelago whole in Japanese territory. And it invaded Korea and Taiwan and it expanded a territory. Bay leading it invaded and it made in territory. phay It did but from 2nd car global war. Japan became independent Korea. Also the Dokdo was returned to Korea. It is like that in spite of it asserts zero Yoo volume of the Dokdo. Korea defends a territory has the recognition. The other side Japan expands a territory has a recognition.