동북아시아 후기구석기시대 세형돌날몸돌의 기술체계 비교 연구 - 아무르강 중류 셀렘자 후기구석기문화를 중심으로 -
Study of comparison of microblade core technical system of Upper Paleolithic in Northeast Asia
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Upper Paleolithic complex of Selemdja clearly shows the developing process how the technical feature of Northeast Asian microblade core was erupted and combined. This study examines the type and the sub-type of this site with a new view based on the manufacturing technique for core stones, and classifies into 6 types and 17 sub-types. On these micro-cores, many researchers in Northeast Asia tried to make the frame of the most universal technology by studying various ways to classify each type. However, the diversity of technical eruption in their studies didn't explain the technical eruption on a single site or was just theoretical. The diversity also failed to show that the technical eruption made a time arrangement in which process. Therefore, this study tries to explain the problems into three parts by re-examining the upper-mentioned each type in technical side. The three parts are (1) the bifacial technique system, (2) system of the use of the flake and (3) system of the use of blank. By this, the study can figure it out that these three systems are related with the culture patterns' changes of the Microblade Culture in Selemdja Upper Paleolithic Site. In other words, explained with a relative chronological frame, it means that firstly it had appeared to the complex technical system corresponded to bifacial system and then the use of the ventral part of flake added to the existed system. The last step of Upper Paleolithic Age seems to have used the manufacturing technique for prismatic core or conical core based on a developing technique to utilize the raw material.
Abstract
The Upper Paleolithic complex of Selemdja clearly shows the developing process how the technical feature of Northeast Asian microblade core was erupted and combined. This study examines the type and the sub-type of this site with a new view based on the manufacturing technique for core stones, and classifies into 6 types and 17 sub-types. On these micro-cores, many researchers in Northeast Asia tried to make the frame of the most universal technology by studying various ways to classify each type. However, the diversity of technical eruption in their studies didn't explain the technical eruption on a single site or was just theoretical. The diversity also failed to show that the technical eruption made a time arrangement in which process. Therefore, this study tries to explain the problems into three parts by re-examining the upper-mentioned each type in technical side. The three parts are (1) the bifacial technique system, (2) system of the use of the flake and (3) system of the use of blank. By this, the study can figure it out that these three systems are related with the culture patterns' changes of the Microblade Culture in Selemdja Upper Paleolithic Site. In other words, explained with a relative chronological frame, it means that firstly it had appeared to the complex technical system corresponded to bifacial system and then the use of the ventral part of flake added to the existed system. The last step of Upper Paleolithic Age seems to have used the manufacturing technique for prismatic core or conical core based on a developing technique to utilize the raw material.
참고문헌 (24)
- 성춘택, "세석인 제작기술과 세석기", 한국고고학보, 38 (1998), 한국고고학회
- 이융조, "단양 수양개 후기구석기시대의 배모양 석기의 연구", 고문화, 35 (1989), 한국대학박물관협회
- 李隆助, "한국 좀돌날몸돌의 연구", 先史文化, 2 (1994), 충북대학교 선사문화연구소
- 李憲宗, "東北아시아 세형돌날문화의 起源問題에 대한 試考", 博物館年報, (5) (1997), 木浦大學校博物館
- 李憲宗, "동북아시아 후기구석기 최말기의 성격과 문화변동에 관한 연구", 한국고고학보, 39 (1998), 한국고고학회
- 이헌종, "동북아시아 후기구석기시대의 기술격지에 대한 연구", 고문화, 54 (1999), 한국대학박물관협회
- 이헌종, "우리나라 후기구석기 최말기와 신석기시대로의 이행기의 문화적 성격, 전환기의 고고학 I" (2002), 학연문화사
- 이헌종, "우리나라 후기구석기시대 측면몸돌과 돌날석기문화와의 기술적 맥락에 대한 연구", 고문화, (63), pp.65~82 (2004), 한국대학박물관협회
- 장용준, "韓半島出土 細石核의 編年", 한국고고학보, 48, pp.1~1 (2002), 한국고고학회
- 장용준, "한국 후기구석기의 제작기법과 편년 연구" (2007), 학연문화사
- "The Origin and Despersal of the Microblade Technique in Northern Eurasia, Sapporo", ~ (1993)
- Artem'ev E.V, "Mikroplastinchataya indystriya Berkhnepaleoliticheskikh pamyatnikom srednei Sibiri(srednee techenie r. Enisei)", 박사, pp.1996
- Derevianko A.P, "Formation of Blade Industries in Eastern Asia", Journal of Archaeology Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia, 4(24) (2005)
- Derevianko A.P., "Paleolit Selemdji, Novosibirsk", ~ (1995)
- Derevianko A.P., "Selemdjinskaya Pozdnepaleoliticheskaya Kultura, IAE&RAS SB, Novosibirsk", ~ (1998)
- Drozdov N.I., "The microlithic industry of the Late Paleolithic sites of the Yenisei river basin, The Origin and Dispersal of Microblade Industry in Northern Eurasia. in Sapporo", ~ (1993)
- Generalov A.G, "On classification of splitting techniques in Preceramic complexes of Kansk-Enissey region, The Origin and Dispersal of Microblade Industry in Northern Eurasia. in Sapporo", ~ (1993)
- Inesin E, "The system of Splitting and Adaptation Mechanism(on Bolshoy Yakor materials), The Origin and Dispersal of Microblade Industry in Northern Eurasia. in Sapporo", ~ (1993)
- Lee, Heon-jong, "Pozdnepaleoliticheskie kompleksyi uga rossiiskogo dalinego bostoka I sopredelinykch territorii, dok.dicc.", ~ (1995)
- Lipnina I.A., "Micro splitting, Micro cores, Universal preforms, The Origin and Dispersal of Microblade Industry in Northern Eurasia. in Sapporo", ~ (1993)
- Mochanov U.A, "Mnogosloinaya stoyanka Bel'kachi i periodizatsiya kamennogo veka v Yakutii, M-", ~ (1969)
- Mochanov U.A.․, "Arkheologicheskie pamytniki Yatutii. M-", ~ (1991)
- Petrin B.G., "The origin of the microlithic tradition in the Altai-butt core and burins in the Kara-Bom site, The Origin and Dispersal of Microblade Industry in Northern Eurasia. in Sapporo", ~ (1993)
- Saveriev N.A, "Some Aspects in the Study of Blade Industries of neolithic Siberia, The Origin and Dispersal of Microblade Industry in Northern Eurasia. in Sapporo", ~ (1993)