限韓令 展開와 文化콘텐츠産業의 課題
China’s Ban on Hallyu and Challenges of Cultural Contents Industry
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The centre of the gravity of the world’s politics and economics is gradually shifting towards Asia form Europe and North America in the 21st century. Especially in China and Northeast Asian countries are pursuing cultural development based on their economic power and are aiming for globalization. China is heading towards the ‘China Dream’ and ‘The Powerful Culture’, and Japan is steadily maintaining its ‘move towards right-wing policy’ based on a country’s economic growth. It is obvious that Korea’s cultural strategy and policy setting is a very important period in the realization of the hegemonic dominance of the world culture. Since the 2000s, the Chinese government’s cultural policy has emphasized the revival of traditional culture based on the expansion of Cultural Power of Imperial. In particular, in 2011, the Chinese government adopted to ‘build up the socialist cultural powerhouse’ as a new national vision. To achieve this, the Chinese government has set up the cultural industry as a national strategic industry, and has strongly promoted the national image and strengthened soft power. In this context, China has carried out economic retaliation against South Korea over THAAD, which also hurts China’s economy. As a result, structural weaknesses of Korean economy and industry on China trade are emerging as an urgent task. Among these changes, how will we, who experienced colonial cultural imperialism, recognize and accept various cultural conflicts beyond the political and economic problems with China? As a method to find its solutions, this study looked at the interrelated aspects of ‘China’s ban on Hallyu’ and ‘cultural contents industry’.
Abstract
The centre of the gravity of the world’s politics and economics is gradually shifting towards Asia form Europe and North America in the 21st century. Especially in China and Northeast Asian countries are pursuing cultural development based on their economic power and are aiming for globalization. China is heading towards the ‘China Dream’ and ‘The Powerful Culture’, and Japan is steadily maintaining its ‘move towards right-wing policy’ based on a country’s economic growth. It is obvious that Korea’s cultural strategy and policy setting is a very important period in the realization of the hegemonic dominance of the world culture. Since the 2000s, the Chinese government’s cultural policy has emphasized the revival of traditional culture based on the expansion of Cultural Power of Imperial. In particular, in 2011, the Chinese government adopted to ‘build up the socialist cultural powerhouse’ as a new national vision. To achieve this, the Chinese government has set up the cultural industry as a national strategic industry, and has strongly promoted the national image and strengthened soft power. In this context, China has carried out economic retaliation against South Korea over THAAD, which also hurts China’s economy. As a result, structural weaknesses of Korean economy and industry on China trade are emerging as an urgent task. Among these changes, how will we, who experienced colonial cultural imperialism, recognize and accept various cultural conflicts beyond the political and economic problems with China? As a method to find its solutions, this study looked at the interrelated aspects of ‘China’s ban on Hallyu’ and ‘cultural contents industry’.
참고문헌 (47)
- 2017년 2분기 콘텐츠산업 동향분석 보고서, "이현우", 한국콘텐츠진흥원, ~ (2017)
- 권기영, "‘한한령(限韓令) ’을 통해 본 중국 대외문화정책의 딜레마", 중국문화연구, (37), pp.29~54 (2017), 중국문화연구학회[DOI]
- 남송우, "동북아시아 지역의 문화정책의 흐름과 교류의 방향성 모색", 동북아 문화연구, 1(44), pp.5~17 (2015), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 이순임, "시진핑 출범 이후 중국 방송정책의 특징과 변화", 지역과 커뮤니케이션, 19(4), pp.93~138 (2015), 부산울산경남언론학회
- 정환우, "중국의 가공단계별 수출입구조로 본 중국 내수시장 변화와 시사점", Trade Focus, 10, pp.1~50 (2011)
- 주민욱, "한한령(限韩令)에 대한 중국 언론보도 사회관계망분석(SNA) 연구", 중국학, (60), pp.285~301 (2017), 대한중국학회[DOI]
- 김휘정, "중국의 한한령(限韓令)과 문화콘텐츠산업의 과제", 이슈와 논점, (1264), pp.1~4 (2017), 국회입법조사처
- 신건식, "한한령(限韓令), 기회가 될 수 있다", 미디어, 2016, pp.1~16
- 이임자, "중국 정부의 한국 여행 제한 조치가 국내 소비재산업에 미치는 영향 분석", i-KIET 산업경제이슈, (19), pp.1~12 (2017)
- 이태형, "중국 문화정책의 통시적 고찰", 문화교류와 다문화교육, 5(3), pp.81~100 (2016), 한국국제문화교류학회
- 허지영, "2017 콘텐츠산업 수출 현황 및 전망", 코카이슈분석, (17-16), pp.1~8 (2017), 한국콘텐츠진흥원
- 최근 중국 경제제재 파급효과 추정, "김윤지", 한국수출입 은행, 1~9 (2017)
- 김현경, "포기할 수 없는 중국 시장, 전략의 다변화 필요", 방송 콘텐츠의 수출 진단 및 전략, 93~114 (2017)
- 사드 갈등 장기화에 따른 국내 관광산업 손실규모 추정, "전해영", 현대경제연구원, 1~9 (2017)
- 정부관계부처합동, "방한 관광시장 활성화 방안", 관광 관련 경제현안간담회 자료집, 1~12 (2017)
- 중국의 사드보복이 경제 및 산업에 미치는 영향, "장보형", 하나금융경영연구소, 1~35 (2017)
- 최근 일본 통상정책의 변화와 우리의 대응방안, "정훈", KIEP대외경제정책연구원, 1~108 (2017)
- 최근 일본의 대외 통상정책, "한일경제협회", 한일산업기술협력 재단 일본지식정보센터, 1~6 (2013)
- "중국 언론보도를 통해 살펴본 한한령(限韩令)과 우리의 대응 방안" (2017), 주민욱[URL]
- "中정부, 한 번도 ‘금한령’ 발표 안 해…자발적 행동" (2017)[URL]
- "中, 사드 보복성 규제...난기류에 빠진 ‘中 한류’" (2016)[URL]
- "중국, 한한령 ‘해빙 모드’" (2018)[URL]
- "뽀로로 넘은 ‘상어가족송’, 中기업이 유사품 제작⋅유통" (2018)[URL]
- "이거 짝퉁인데? 中, 한류 베낀 예능 버젓이 판매도" (2018)[URL]
- 김재범, "한한령의 원인과 대응정책", <한한령의 원인과 대응정책> 공동 세미나 자료 (2017), 한국문화산업교류재단
- "한한령(限韓令)과 한국 문화산업" (2016)[URL]
- "2017년 2분기 국내 콘텐츠산업규모"[URL]
- "리커창 “무역전쟁 동참하라” 삼성⋅현대차 “배터리 문제 풀자”" (2018)[URL]
- "外交部發言人耿爽主持例行記者會" (2016)[URL]
- "中國外交部網站" (2017)[URL]
- "外交部部長王毅在2017年國際形勢與中國外交研討會開幕式上的演講" (2017)[URL]
- "國家新聞出版廣電總局要求“新浪微博”, “ACFUN”等網站關停視聽節目服務" (2017)[URL]
- "中國文化産業振興規劃" (2018)[URL]
- "十二五時期文化改革發展計劃綱要" (2018)[URL]
- "關于進一步加強網絡視聽節目創作播出管理的通知"[URL]
- "韓媒曝光中國‘限韓令’9月1日電視台實施" (2016)[URL]
- "中韓關系轉圜？關于“薩德”有些疑惑不得不說" (2017)[URL]
- "限韓令原因是什麼? 限韓令升級為什麼讓韓國恐慌？" (2016)[URL]
- "“限韓令”能否逼韓國放棄薩德" (2016)[URL]
- "“限韓令”可能真的要解禁了 但衛視和網站的購劇潮恐難再現？" (2017)[URL]
- "廣電總局下發特急文件 進一步規範網絡視聽節目傳播秩序" (2018)[URL]
- "中國共産黨第十七屆中央委員會第六次全體會議公報" (2011)[URL]
- "한한령" (2018)[URL]
- "限韓令" (2018)[URL]
- "상어가족" (2017)[URL]
- "상어가족" (2017)[URL]
- "귀요미송" (2016)[URL]