본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상고중국어 양상부사 연구

A Study on Modal Adverbs in Ancient Chinese

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Through the review of prior research, this paper completed the semantics system of the adverb of ancient Chinese style and analyzed the usage of modal adverbs in ancient Chinese language according to the criteria and organized the meaning and syntactic features of the sentences in which they were written. The results are as follows. The semantic type of modal adverbs can be largely classified into epistemic, deontic, dynamic, judgmental and evaluative. They appear in the structure of ‘(NP)+Adv+VP’ and a few examples appear in the structure of ‘Adv+(NP)+VP’. ‘Judgmental’ refers to the attitude or perspective taken by the speaker on the authenticity of the proposition, which is considered a given fact. It is subdivided into ‘confirmation’ and ‘strength’ based on the perspective of judgment. ‘Epistemic’ refers to the speaker’s view or attitude on the veracity of a proposition that is not known whether it is true or not. It is subdivided into ‘possibility’ and ‘necessity’ depending on the degree of confidence. ‘Deontic’ means refers to the point of view or attitude of the speaker to give the moral responsibility to agent in order to make the situation represented by the proposition a fact. The modal adverbs of ancient Chinese language may only indicate ‘necessity’ with a high degree of necessity. There are only ‘intention’ types of ‘dynamic’ that can be expressed by the modal adverbs of the Ancient Chinese. ‘Evaluative’ refers to the speaker’s view or attitude on the content of the proposition itself. Only two types of ‘counter-expectation’ and ‘fortunateness’ are found in Chinese adverbs.

Abstract

Through the review of prior research, this paper completed the semantics system of the adverb of ancient Chinese style and analyzed the usage of modal adverbs in ancient Chinese language according to the criteria and organized the meaning and syntactic features of the sentences in which they were written. The results are as follows. The semantic type of modal adverbs can be largely classified into epistemic, deontic, dynamic, judgmental and evaluative. They appear in the structure of ‘(NP)+Adv+VP’ and a few examples appear in the structure of ‘Adv+(NP)+VP’. ‘Judgmental’ refers to the attitude or perspective taken by the speaker on the authenticity of the proposition, which is considered a given fact. It is subdivided into ‘confirmation’ and ‘strength’ based on the perspective of judgment. ‘Epistemic’ refers to the speaker’s view or attitude on the veracity of a proposition that is not known whether it is true or not. It is subdivided into ‘possibility’ and ‘necessity’ depending on the degree of confidence. ‘Deontic’ means refers to the point of view or attitude of the speaker to give the moral responsibility to agent in order to make the situation represented by the proposition a fact. The modal adverbs of ancient Chinese language may only indicate ‘necessity’ with a high degree of necessity. There are only ‘intention’ types of ‘dynamic’ that can be expressed by the modal adverbs of the Ancient Chinese. ‘Evaluative’ refers to the speaker’s view or attitude on the content of the proposition itself. Only two types of ‘counter-expectation’ and ‘fortunateness’ are found in Chinese adverbs.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 박재연, "한국어 양태 어미 연구" (2006), 태학사
  2. 박성하, "양태조동사 ‘能’의 하위분류 및 주어와의 공기특성 분석", 중어중문학, (61), pp.429~458 (2015), 한국중어중문학회
  3. 이기갑, "언어유형론(시제⋅상, 양상, 조동사, 수동태)" (2008), 월인
  4. 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (1998), 한국문화사
  5. 유선영, "『상서』의 부사 연구", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.2004
  6. 유선영, "『尙書』의 양태부사 고찰", 중국어문학논집, (28), pp.155~180 (2004), 중국어문학연구회
  7. 윤순일, "고대중국어 ‘當’의 문법화 小考 - 미래시표지 용법을 중심으로", 중국문화연구, (31), pp.297~316 (2016), 중국문화연구학회[DOI]
  8. 윤순일, "상고한어 양상부사의 범위", 중국학논총, (58), pp.1~27 (2017), 중국학연구소[DOI]
  9. 高育花, "中古漢語副詞研究" (2007), 黃山書社
  10. 谷峰, "先秦漢語情態副詞研究", 博士, pp.2010
  11. 李明, "漢語助動詞的歷史演變研究", 博士, pp.2001
  12. 劉利, "先秦漢語助動詞研究" (2000), 北京師範大學出版社
  13. 馬慶株, "能願動詞的連用", 中國語文, (1) (1988)
  14. 彭利貞, "現代漢語情態研究" (2007), 中國社會科學出版社
  15. 史金生, "語氣副詞的範圍、類別和共現順序", 中國語文, (1) (2003)
  16. 魏培泉, "古漢語時體標記的語序類型與演變", 語言暨語言學, 16(2) (2015)
  17. 謝佳玲, "漢語的情態動詞", 博士, pp.2002
  18. 謝佳玲, "漢語情態詞的語意界定", 中國語文研究, 21, pp.45~63 (2006)
  19. 楊伯峻, "文言文法" (1972), 中華書局
  20. 楊伯峻, "古漢語語法及其發展" (1992), 語文出版社
  21. 尹淳一, "≪祖堂集≫情態動詞及其語法化研究", 博士, pp.2014
  22. 張誼生, "現代漢語副詞研究" (2000), 學林出版社
  23. 朱冠明, "摩訶僧祗律"情態動詞研究" (2008), 中國戲劇出版社
  24. Bybee, Joan, "The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World" (1994), The University of Chicago Press
  25. Li, Renzhi, "Modality in English and Chinese: a Typological Perspective", PhD, pp.2004
  26. Lyons, J, "Semantic(V.2)" (1977), Cambridge University Press
  27. Palmer, F. R, "Mood and Modality" (1986), Cambridge University Press
  28. Palmer, F. R, "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  29. Traugott, "Regularity in Semantic Change" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  30. van der Auwera, J, "Modality’s Semantic Map", Linguistic Typology, 2, pp.79~124 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)