본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고대 동아시아 삼국의 서역과의 관련성에 관한 일시론

The Study on the Relationships between the Three Countries of Old East Asian and the Western Countries

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

As a part of understanding the Study on the Relationships between the Three Countries of Old East Asian and the Western Countries, we first reviewed the characteristics of the syntactic of each country’s languageand contemplated upon how the ethical groups of the three countries in the East Asia including the Han of China were related to the other adjacent ethnic groups. Consequently, we could organize the related aspects of the Study on the Relationships between Three Countries of Old East and the Western Countries as below. The language structures of the East Asian countries are divided into the SOV type of Altai and SVO type of Chinese. The Tibetan of the northwest of China, Korean and Japanese of the east, and Burmese of the south belong to the SOV type while the Vietnamese and Malay of the South belong to the SVO type like Chinese. we can only argue that the origin of the Chinese people and the Chinese languagecame from tribes that came to the central district of China through the Central Asia from a part of the VSO type Sem or people who use the northern Indo-European languages from Arabian peninsular, Mesopotamia, or north of the Black Sea. In contrast to the origin of China which is related to the Sem of the countries bordering on Western China or the people who use the northern Indo-European languages, the origin of Koreans and Japanese can be said to be related to the Altai of North Asia or Dravidan or Indo-Aryan languages of the Southwest Asia of SOV type which can be referred to as the substratum of the Chinese language of East Asia. Through the Chunsan mountains and Kunrun mountainsof the Central Asia, China accepted the western culture and turned it into Chinese in the Yellow River area. Korea, on the other hand, used the western culture it accepted through the Altai mountains and Hangai mountains of the north as its own by naturalizing it near Yoha and Heilong Jiang River while Japan accepted the western culture of the south such as Egypt, Arabia, Iran, and India it had brought about through Kunrun mountains and Himalayas and naturalized near the Jang River. Korea is related to the countries bordering on Western China through Yoha during the Sungodae and through Yellow River area in the ancient times. Japan had links to the countries bordering on Western China through Yoha and Heilong Jiang River during the Jomon Era before the 3rd century B.C., or the Sungodae and through Jang River during the Yahoi Era between 3rd B.C. and 3rd A.D. However, after 4th century in the Gobun Era, it came to share it through the Korean peninsular whose relationship with the Yellow Riverarea became thicker. Such a relationships between the countries bordering on Western China and the Three Countries of Korea, China, and Japan in the ancient East Asia is related to the fact that the center of political stage in the Western Countries moved to the south from the north and then again to the north.

Abstract

As a part of understanding the Study on the Relationships between the Three Countries of Old East Asian and the Western Countries, we first reviewed the characteristics of the syntactic of each country’s languageand contemplated upon how the ethical groups of the three countries in the East Asia including the Han of China were related to the other adjacent ethnic groups. Consequently, we could organize the related aspects of the Study on the Relationships between Three Countries of Old East and the Western Countries as below. The language structures of the East Asian countries are divided into the SOV type of Altai and SVO type of Chinese. The Tibetan of the northwest of China, Korean and Japanese of the east, and Burmese of the south belong to the SOV type while the Vietnamese and Malay of the South belong to the SVO type like Chinese. we can only argue that the origin of the Chinese people and the Chinese languagecame from tribes that came to the central district of China through the Central Asia from a part of the VSO type Sem or people who use the northern Indo-European languages from Arabian peninsular, Mesopotamia, or north of the Black Sea. In contrast to the origin of China which is related to the Sem of the countries bordering on Western China or the people who use the northern Indo-European languages, the origin of Koreans and Japanese can be said to be related to the Altai of North Asia or Dravidan or Indo-Aryan languages of the Southwest Asia of SOV type which can be referred to as the substratum of the Chinese language of East Asia. Through the Chunsan mountains and Kunrun mountainsof the Central Asia, China accepted the western culture and turned it into Chinese in the Yellow River area. Korea, on the other hand, used the western culture it accepted through the Altai mountains and Hangai mountains of the north as its own by naturalizing it near Yoha and Heilong Jiang River while Japan accepted the western culture of the south such as Egypt, Arabia, Iran, and India it had brought about through Kunrun mountains and Himalayas and naturalized near the Jang River. Korea is related to the countries bordering on Western China through Yoha during the Sungodae and through Yellow River area in the ancient times. Japan had links to the countries bordering on Western China through Yoha and Heilong Jiang River during the Jomon Era before the 3rd century B.C., or the Sungodae and through Jang River during the Yahoi Era between 3rd B.C. and 3rd A.D. However, after 4th century in the Gobun Era, it came to share it through the Korean peninsular whose relationship with the Yellow Riverarea became thicker. Such a relationships between the countries bordering on Western China and the Three Countries of Korea, China, and Japan in the ancient East Asia is related to the fact that the center of political stage in the Western Countries moved to the south from the north and then again to the north.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 이춘식, "중국고대사의 전개", pp.59~ (1987), 예문출판사
  2. 변광수, "세계주요언어", pp.1146~ (1993), 외국어대학교출판부
  3. 조철수, "수메르어․국어고어 문법범주 대조분석", 언어학, (19), pp.360~ (1996), 한국언어학회
  4. H.H.램, "기후와 역사", pp.153~158 (2004), 한울 아카데미
  5. 우실하, "동북공정너머 요하문명론", pp.265~ (2007), 소나무
  6. 제카리아 시친, "수메르, 혹은 신들의 고향", pp.85~ (2007), 이른아침
  7. 궈다순, "동북문화와 유연문명", pp.235~ (2008), 동북아역사재단
  8. 水野裕, "日本古代の民族と 國家", pp.40~ (1975), 大和書房
  9. 市河三喜, "世界言語學槪說下", pp.1171~1198 (1981), 硏究社
  10. 風間喜代三, "印毆語の故鄕を探る", pp.194~ (1999), 岩波書店
  11. Norman,Jerry, "Chinese", pp.10~11 (1988), Cambridge University Press
  12. de Lacouperie, "Western Origin of the Early Chinese Civilisation", pp.4~376 (1966), Osnabruck Otto Zeller
  13. Adrados,Francisco R, "The Archaic Structure of Hittite: The Crux of the Problem", pp.11~20 (1982), Washington Institute for the Study of Man
  14. 田繼周, "商代民族和 民族關係", 中國民族史硏究, pp.324~ (1987)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (27건)