자본위 이론과 도상성
Sinogram as the Basic Unit and Iconicity
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to show the iconic relationships between form and meaning in Chinese and to examine the six categories of Chinese characters. According to the Xu Tongqiang's “sinogram-based theory”, the basic structure of Chinese units ‘Zi(字)’ and coding mechanism is discussed. There is a natural and motivated relationship between form and meaning. Language has a characteristics of iconicity as well as arbitrariness. Language is a realistic coding system, in Chinese coding code is ‘Zi(字)’. The six categories of Chinese characters combining modern methods of cognitive linguistics is analyzed. ‘Zi(字)’ is a motivation reflected in real phenomenon, to explore the ‘Zi(字)’ motivations between form and meaning. Pictographic(Xiangxing), Self-explanatory(Zhishi), Associative compound(Huiyi), Mutually explanatory characters(Zhuanzhu), the relationship between form and meaning is motivations. Shape and sound(Xingsheng) with the salient property of likeness of the objects belonging to the iconicity. Phonetic loan character(Jiajie), the relationship between form and meaning is arbitrary.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to show the iconic relationships between form and meaning in Chinese and to examine the six categories of Chinese characters. According to the Xu Tongqiang's “sinogram-based theory”, the basic structure of Chinese units ‘Zi(字)’ and coding mechanism is discussed. There is a natural and motivated relationship between form and meaning. Language has a characteristics of iconicity as well as arbitrariness. Language is a realistic coding system, in Chinese coding code is ‘Zi(字)’. The six categories of Chinese characters combining modern methods of cognitive linguistics is analyzed. ‘Zi(字)’ is a motivation reflected in real phenomenon, to explore the ‘Zi(字)’ motivations between form and meaning. Pictographic(Xiangxing), Self-explanatory(Zhishi), Associative compound(Huiyi), Mutually explanatory characters(Zhuanzhu), the relationship between form and meaning is motivations. Shape and sound(Xingsheng) with the salient property of likeness of the objects belonging to the iconicity. Phonetic loan character(Jiajie), the relationship between form and meaning is arbitrary.
참고문헌 (25)
- 권희상, "언어의 도상성", 언어연구, 21(1), pp.5~37 (2005), 한국현대언어학회
- 류동춘, "한자체계의 構形類型 변화에 관한 연구--한자는 왜 假借에서 形聲의 길을 택했을까?", 중어중문학, 29 (2001)
- 박영록, "中國語 統辭構造의 ‘理據’와 字本位論", 중국문학연구, 31(31), pp.291~327 (2005), 한국중문학회
- 성창섭, "언어분석의 도상적 접근", 언어과학, 8(2) (2001)
- 윤희수, "인지언어학의 설명력", 언어과학연구, 16 (1999)
- 임상순, "영어 통사구조의 도상성에 관한 연구", 서울시립대학교논문집, 23 (1989)
- 임지룡, "유상성의 인지적 의미분석", 문학과 언어, 16 (1995)
- 임지룡, "인지의미론" (1997), 탑출판사
- 임지룡, "국어에 내재한 도상성의 양상과 의미 특성", 한글, (266), pp.169~205 (2004), 한글학회
- 헬비히, "言語學史" (1992), 경문사
- 황영순, "한국어와 영어의 체계 및 사고논리의 비교", 평택대학교 논문집, 19 (2005)
- 裘錫圭, "文字學槪要" (1988), 商務印書館
- 戴浩一, "时间顺序和汉语的语序", 國外語言學, (1) (1985)
- 戴浩一, "以认知为基础的汉语功能语法刍议", 國外語言學, (4) (1990)
- 董爲光, "话说"音义初始"", 語言硏究, (1) (1997)
- 劉又辛, "從漢字演變的歷史看文字改革" (1993), 中華書局
- 劉又辛, "“右文說”說" (1993), 中華書局
- 徐通锵, "語義句法芻議" (1993), 河南敎育出版社
- 徐通锵, "字”和汉语研究的方法论", 世界汉语教学, (3) (1994)
- 徐通锵, "語言論-語義型語言的結句原理和硏究方法" (1997), 東北師範大學出版社
- 徐通锵, "漢語的特點和語言共性的硏究", 語文硏究, (4) (1999)
- 徐通锵, "編碼機制的調整和漢語語彙系統的發展", 語言硏究, (1) (2001)
- 徐通锵, "思惟方式與語法硏究的方法論", 北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 41(1) (2004)
- 徐通锵, "漢語字本位語法導論" (2008), 山東敎育出版社
- 許進雄, "중국고대사회-文字와 人類學의 透視" (1991), 동문선