통계적 공간상세화 기법의 시공간적 강우분포 재현성 비교평가
Comparative Evaluation of Reproducibility for Spatio-temporal Rainfall Distribution Downscaled Using Different Statistical Methods
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Various techniques for bias correction and statistical downscaling have been developed to overcome the limitations related to the spatial and temporalresolution and error of climate change scenario data required in various applied research fields including agriculture and water resources. In this study,the characteristics of three different statistical dowscaling methods (i.e., SQM, SDQDM, and BCSA) provided by AIMS were summarized, and climatechange scenarios produced by applying each method were comparatively evaluated. In order to compare the average rainfall characteristics of the pastperiod, an index representing the average rainfall characteristics was used, and the reproducibility of extreme weather conditions was evaluated throughthe abnormal climate-related index. The reproducibility comparison of spatial distribution and variability was compared through variogram and patternidentification of spatial distribution using the average value of the index of the past period. For temporal reproducibility comparison, the raw data andeach detailing technique were compared using the transition probability. The results of the study are presented by quantitatively evaluating the strengthsand weaknesses of each method. Through comparison of statistical techniques, we expect that the strengths and weaknesses of each detailing techniquecan be represented, and the most appropriate statistical detailing technique can be advised for the relevant research.
Abstract
Various techniques for bias correction and statistical downscaling have been developed to overcome the limitations related to the spatial and temporalresolution and error of climate change scenario data required in various applied research fields including agriculture and water resources. In this study,the characteristics of three different statistical dowscaling methods (i.e., SQM, SDQDM, and BCSA) provided by AIMS were summarized, and climatechange scenarios produced by applying each method were comparatively evaluated. In order to compare the average rainfall characteristics of the pastperiod, an index representing the average rainfall characteristics was used, and the reproducibility of extreme weather conditions was evaluated throughthe abnormal climate-related index. The reproducibility comparison of spatial distribution and variability was compared through variogram and patternidentification of spatial distribution using the average value of the index of the past period. For temporal reproducibility comparison, the raw data andeach detailing technique were compared using the transition probability. The results of the study are presented by quantitatively evaluating the strengthsand weaknesses of each method. Through comparison of statistical techniques, we expect that the strengths and weaknesses of each detailing techniquecan be represented, and the most appropriate statistical detailing technique can be advised for the relevant research.
참고문헌 (21)
- Cannon, A., "Bias correction of gcm precipitation by quantile mapping: How well do methods preserve changes in quantiles and extremes?", Journal of Climate, 28(17), pp.6938~6959 (2015)
- Cho, J. P., "Impact of climate change on streamflows in Gwangdong Dam watershed by considering uncertainty", Korean Society of Civil Engineers, pp.1778~1781 (2013)
- Cho, J. P., "Climate change impacts on agricultural drought with consideration of uncertainty in cmip5 scenarios", Irrigation and Drainage, 65(S2), pp.7~15 (2016)
- 조재필, "사용자 중심의 기후변화 시나리오 상세화기법 개발 및 한반도 적용", 한국기후변화학회지, 9(1), pp.13~29 (2018), 한국기후변화학회[DOI]
- 정유란, "상세화된 CMIP5 기후변화전망의 다중모델앙상블 접근에 의한 농업기후지수 평가", 한국농림기상학회지, 17(2), pp.108~125 (2015), 한국농림기상학회[DOI]
- Eum, H., "Intercomparison of projected changes in climate extremes for South Korea : application of trend preserving statistical downscaling methods to the CMIP5 ensemble", International Journal of Climatology, 37(8), pp.3381~3397 (2016)
- 정임국, "기후변화 시나리오 자료의 불확실성 고려를 위한 대표 GCM 선정기법 개발", 한국농공학회논문집, 60(5), pp.149~162 (2018), 한국농공학회[DOI]
- Karl, T. R., "CLIVAR", GCOS, Climate Change, pp.1999, 42(1)[DOI]
- 김철겸, "GCM 및 상세화 기법 선정을 고려한 충주댐 유입량 기후변화 영향 평가", 한국기후변화학회지, 9(1), pp.47~58 (2018), 한국기후변화학회[DOI]
- 김동현, "GCM 공간상세화 방법별 기후변화에 따른 수문영향 평가- 만경강 유역을 중심으로 -", 한국농공학회논문집, 61(6), pp.81~92 (2019), 한국농공학회[DOI]
- 김시수, "유역 공간 강우 산정방법에 따른 VfloTM 분포형 강우-유출 모형의 매개변수 평가 - 금호강 동촌 유역을 대상으로 -", 한국농공학회논문집, 55(1), pp.9~15 (2013), 한국농공학회
- Pachauri, R. K., "Conbribution of working groups ⅰ, ⅱ and ⅲ to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change", Climate Change (2014)
- 박지훈, "CMIP5 GCMs과 추정 방법에 따른 우리나라 기준증발산량 평가", 농촌계획, 23(4), pp.153~168 (2017), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- 박민규, "일강우량의 적정 베리오그램", 대한토목학회 논문집B, 30(6), pp.525~532 (2010), 대한토목학회
- Report on the activities of the working group on climate change detection and related rapporteurs 1998-2001, "Petersion, T. C.", WMO, 143~, pp.Rep. WCDMP-47, WMO-TD 1071 (2001)
- Peterson, T. C., "Climate change indices", WMO Bulletin, 54(2), pp.83~86 (2005)
- Hwang, S., "Development and comparative evaluation of a stochastic analog method to downscale daily GCM precipitation", Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(11), pp.4481~4502 (2013)
- Hwang, S., "Assessment of alternative methods for statistically downscaling daily GCM precipitation ouputs to simulate regional streamflow", Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 50(4), pp.1010~1032 (2014)
- Hwang, S., "Hydrologic implications of errors in bias-corrected regional reanalysis data for west central Florida", Journal of Hydrology, 510, pp.513~529 (2014)
- 황세운, "CMIP5 GCM의 동아시아 해안지역에 대한 공간적 강우특성 재현성 평가", 한국수자원학회 논문집, 51(8), pp.629~642 (2018), 한국수자원학회[DOI]
- 황세운, "남한지역 일단위 강우량 공간상세화를 위한 BCSA 기법 적용성 검토", 한국농공학회논문집, 63(6), pp.49~60 (2021), 한국농공학회[DOI]