The Phasal Movement Hypothesis and Syntactic Freezing
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper supports the phasal movement hypothesis (Chomsky 2005) by further motivating and extending the notion of EF‐movement. Six criteria of EF‐movement are proposed and motivated for the extended notion of EF‐movement. Specifically, clause‐internal scrambling is shown to be EF‐movement by claiming that EF‐movement may be induced by EF of a non‐phase head like T as well as by EF of a phase head like C, satisfying the six criteria of EF‐movement. This natural extension of the notion of EF‐movement not only solves some puzzles of scrambling but also contributes to the proper characterization of Agree. Criterion 4 of discourse effects for EF‐movement is motivated in depth in terms of the syntactic freezing phenomena, for which it is shown that the D‐Property Freezing Principle is motivated better than the existing syntactic freezing principles, the Criterial Freezing Principle (Rizzi 2004b) and the Inactivation Freezing Principle (Chomsky 2005). According to criterion 4, discourse effects rather than scopal effects are shown to be crucial property of EF‐movement.
Abstract
This paper supports the phasal movement hypothesis (Chomsky 2005) by further motivating and extending the notion of EF‐movement. Six criteria of EF‐movement are proposed and motivated for the extended notion of EF‐movement. Specifically, clause‐internal scrambling is shown to be EF‐movement by claiming that EF‐movement may be induced by EF of a non‐phase head like T as well as by EF of a phase head like C, satisfying the six criteria of EF‐movement. This natural extension of the notion of EF‐movement not only solves some puzzles of scrambling but also contributes to the proper characterization of Agree. Criterion 4 of discourse effects for EF‐movement is motivated in depth in terms of the syntactic freezing phenomena, for which it is shown that the D‐Property Freezing Principle is motivated better than the existing syntactic freezing principles, the Criterial Freezing Principle (Rizzi 2004b) and the Inactivation Freezing Principle (Chomsky 2005). According to criterion 4, discourse effects rather than scopal effects are shown to be crucial property of EF‐movement.
참고문헌 (32)
- "Syntax at the Edge: CrossClausal Phenomena and the Syntax of Passamaqhoddy" (2001)
- "Topic and Focus in Korean: The Information Partition by Phrase Structure and Morphology", Volume 6 (1997), CSLI Publication , Stanford Linguistics Association
- "Optimizing Structure in Context-Scrambling and Information Structure:Center for the Study of Language and Information" (1999), CLSI Publications
- "Minimalist Inquiries- the Framework:Step by Step-Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik" (2000), The MIT Press
- "Derivation by Phase:Ken Hale-A Life in Language", pp.152~ (2001), The MIT Press
- "On Nature and Language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- "On Phases" (2005), MIT
- "Approaching UG from Below" (2006), MIT
- "The Theory of Principles and Parameters Armin von Stechow An International Handbook of Contemporary Research", (am) (1993), and Theo Vennemann
- "Economy and Semantic Inte" (2000), The MIT Press
- "Agreement is Feature Sharing" (2000), Northeastern University
- "The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases" (1982)
- "University of Massachusetts"
- "Movement and Derivation: Eliminating the PBC" (2002)
- "Dependencies: A Study of Anaphoricity and Scra" (1996)
- "Phases and Cyclic Agreement:Perspectives on Phases", Volume 49 (2005)
- "Toward a Unified Grammar of Reference", 24 (2005)
- "On the EPP:Perspectives on Phases", Volume 49 (2005)
- "Why Agree? Why Move?LingLunch talk" (2006), MIT
- "Derivations Without Activity Condition:Perspectives on Phases", Volume 49 (2005)
- "Some AGREEment Matters", 22 (2003)
- "A Distinctness Condition on Linearization" (2003), MIT
- "The MIT Press" (1990)
- "Locality and Left Periphery", Vol. 3 (2004), Oxford University Press, New York
- "On the Form of Chains: Criterial Positions and ECP Effects" (2004), University of Geneva
- "LongDistance Scrambling in Japanese Journal of East Asian" (1992)
- "Towards the Unification of Scramblings", MITWPL Number 41(41) (2001), Cambridge
- "Order in Phrase Structure and Movement", 29 (1998)
- "Scrambling, Interpretive Complex, and Cyclic SpellOut" (2004), Boston
- "Focus Movements Distinctness Condition and Intervention Effects" (2005), Harvard University
- "Constraints on Major Subjects Agree and Parallel Movement" (2006), MIT
- "Focus Movement as a Phasal Movement The Journal of Chomskyan Studies 1"