한국과 미국의 성격특성 어휘 비교를 통한 문화성향 차이 분석과 그 함의
Analysis of Cultural Disposition Difference through Comparison of Korean and American Personality Traits Adjectives and its Implications
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to investigate when collecting and classifying personality traits adjectives of Korea and America, is Korea classified as collectivistic culture and America classified as individualistic culture? This study also tried to find out what implications do these culture differences between Korea and America have for introducing American psychology and for importing psychological instruments to Korea? For these purposes, 473 Korean personality traits adjectives and 300 American personality traits adjectives were extracted and then asked Korean evaluators and American evaluators to classify these vocabularies in terms of intrapersonal vocabulary-interpersonal vocabulary and a degree of likableness or dislikableness. Results of analysis revealed that Korean language had higher percentage of intrapersonal vocabularies than interpersonal vocabularies and from Korean people's perspective, more than about 26% among vocabularies which were classified as interpersonal vocabularies could be evaluated as intrapersonal or neutral vocabularies.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate when collecting and classifying personality traits adjectives of Korea and America, is Korea classified as collectivistic culture and America classified as individualistic culture? This study also tried to find out what implications do these culture differences between Korea and America have for introducing American psychology and for importing psychological instruments to Korea? For these purposes, 473 Korean personality traits adjectives and 300 American personality traits adjectives were extracted and then asked Korean evaluators and American evaluators to classify these vocabularies in terms of intrapersonal vocabulary-interpersonal vocabulary and a degree of likableness or dislikableness. Results of analysis revealed that Korean language had higher percentage of intrapersonal vocabularies than interpersonal vocabularies and from Korean people's perspective, more than about 26% among vocabularies which were classified as interpersonal vocabularies could be evaluated as intrapersonal or neutral vocabularies.
참고문헌 (44)
- 금명자, "청소년 내담자와 상담자의 상담에 대한 기대 차이 및 문화적 특성과의 관계", 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 14(3), pp.529~546 (2002), 한국상담심리학회
- 김영채, "400개 성격 특성 기술 형용사의 심상가와 호의가", 사회과학논총, 2(1), pp.17~32 (1984)
- 김은진, "청소년의 문화성향과 내외통제성 및 또래 동조성의 관계", 석사, pp.2001
- 김혜수, "문화의 차이로 인한 영어 표현 연구", 석사, pp.1999
- 박경란, "우리주의 문화에서 개인주의적 성향을 가진 사람들이 지각한 사회적 지지와 소외", 석사, pp.2000
- 박용수, "새 우리말 갈래사전" (1994), 서울대학교 출판부
- 박현경, "집단상담 참가자의 개인주의-집단주의 성향, 상담자 역할기대 및 치료적 요인 연구", 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 16(4), pp.571~596 (2004), 한국상담심리학회
- 신기철, "새 우리말 큰사전" (1993), 삼성출판사
- 유성경, "한국인의 상담에 대한 태도에 관한 분석적 연구", 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 12(2), pp.55~68 (2000)
- 이수원, "한국심리학에서 비교문화 연구의 위상. In 심리학에서의 비교문화 연구", pp.15~26 (1997), 성원사
- 이수원, "인물평가형용사의 적절성,호오도 및 양면가 측정", 한국심리학회지: 일반, 2(1), pp.41~46 (1974)
- 이희영, "심리적 분리와 대학생활 적응 - 성별과 개인주의-집단주의 성향의 중재 효과 -", 한국청소년연구, 15(1), pp.109~136 (2004), 한국청소년정책연구원
- 장성숙, "우리 문화에서의 상담자상", 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 14(3), pp.547~561 (2002), 한국상담심리학회
- 최수향, "비교문화 발달심리학을 위한 방법론적 고찰. In 심리학에서의 비교문화 연구", pp.173~207 (1997), 성원사
- 최태진, "어휘접근에 의한 성격특성 구조의 분석", 박사, pp.2000
- 최태진, "상호의존형 진로의사결정 유형 척도의 개발 : 개인주의-집단주의 관점", 상담학연구, 5(3), pp.647~666 (2004), 한국상담학회
- 한덕웅, "성격 특성의 지각차원", 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 7(1), pp.198~211 (1993)
- Berry,J.W, "Imposed etics-emics-derived etics:The operationalization of compelling idea", International Journal of Psychology, 24, pp.721~735 (1989)
- Berry,J.W, "Cross-cultural psychology:Research and applications" (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Capara,G.V, "The Big Five Questionnaire:A new questionnaire to assess the five factor model", Personality and Individual Differences, 16, pp.281~288 (1993)
- Cheung,F.M, "Indigenous measures of personality assessment in asian countries:A review", Psychological Assessment, 15(3), pp.280~289 (2003)
- Church,A.T, "The emic strategy in the identification and assessment of personality dimensions in a non western culture", Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 19, pp.140~163 (1988)
- Church,A.T, "Filipino personality structure and the big five model:A lexical approach", Journal of Personality, 65(3), pp.477~527 (1997)
- Goldberg,L.R, "From ace to zombie:Some explorations in the language of personality.In Advances in personality assessment", pp.203~234 (1982), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Gough,H.G, "The adjective check list manual(1983 ed.)" (1983), Consulting Psychologists Press
- Hofstede,G, "세계의 문화와 조직" (1995), 학지사
- Hui,C.H, "Measurement of individualism-collectivism", Journal of Research on Personality, 22, pp.17~36 (1988)
- Hui,C.H, "Individualism-collectivism:A study of cross-cultural researchers", Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 17, pp.225~248 (1986)
- John,O.P, "Better than the alphabet:Taxonomies of personality descriptive terms in English,Dutch,and German.In Personality psychology in europe.Theoretical and empirical developments", pp.83~100 (1984), Swets & Zeitlinger
- Kim, B. S. K, "Asian cultural values and the counselling process: Current knowledge and direction for future research", Counselling Psychologist, 29, pp.570~603 (2001)
- Kuo,B.C, "Interdependent and relational tendencies among asian clients:Infusing collectivistic strategies into counselling", Guidance and Counselling, 19(4), pp.158~162 (2004)
- Lado,R, "Language teaching:A scientific approach" (1964), McGraw-Hill
- Martínez,V.B, "Further evidence for the cross-cultural generality of the big seven factor model:Indigenous and imported spanish personality constructs", Journal of Personality, 65(3), pp.567~598 (1997)
- Saucier,G, "Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors:Premises,products,and prospects", Journal of Personality, 69(6), pp.848~879 (2001)
- Schwartz,S.H, "Beyond individualism-collectivism:New cultural dimensions of values.In Individualism and collectivism:Theory,method,and applications", pp.85~119 (1994), Sage
- Shulruf,B, "Development of a new measurement tool for individualism and collectivism", Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25(4), pp.385~401 (2007)
- Singelis,T.M, "Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism:A theoretical and measurement refinement", Cross-Cultural Research, 29, pp.240~275 (1995)
- Szirmak,Z, "Taxonomy and structure of Hungarian personality traits", European Journal of Personality, 8, pp.95~117 (1994)
- Triandis,H.C, "The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts", Psychological Reviews, 96, pp.506~529 (1989)
- Triandis,H.C, "Individualism and collectivism" (1995), Westview Press
- Triandis,H.C, "Individualism and collectivism:Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships", Journal of Personality and Psychology, 54, pp.323~338 (1988)
- Triandis,H.C, "Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism", Journal of Personality and Psychology, 74, pp.118~129 (1998)
- Watson,P.J, "Individualist and collectivist values:Hypotheses suggested by Alexis de Tocqueville", The Journal of Psychology, 136(3), pp.263~271 (2002)
- Yang,K, "Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: The Chinese case", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, pp.1087~1095 (1990)