영조대 『續大典』의 편찬논리와 그 성격
Theory of the Compilation of the 「Soktaejŏn」 during the reign of King Yŏngjo and its Characteristics
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I analyzed the theory of the Compilation of the 「Soktaejŏn」 during the Early Period of the 18th Century. The 「Soktaejŏn」, which was compiled in 1746 (in the 22nd year of King Yŏngjo), on the surface appears to have been designed to cover all the legal changes which had taken place since the 「Kyŏngguk Taechŏn」 was compiled. However, from the standpoint of political thought and of the history of politics, the 「Soktaejŏn」 can also be regarded as having been based on the comprehensive efforts made by Chosŏn society since the 17th century to stabilize the national order, and an effort to embed the new political mechanisms which were undertaken during this period as part of the so-called Tangp'yŏng politics within a code of laws. In compiling 「Soktaejŏn」, King Yŏngjo was designed to secure the monarch more his legitimacy in order to allow him to intervene and to impose compromises between the many factions which were then jostling for position. . The 「Soktaejŏn」was the result of these efforts to search for a new political management system, to strengthen the authority of the king and further the acceptance of constitutionalism. As such, the 「Soktaejŏn」, as a complement to the 「Kyŏngguk Taechŏn」, was meant to promote the usage of the Constitution as a more practical basis through which to rule the country. Once the authority of the 「Kyŏngguk Taechŏn」 was laid out in the Constitution, the authority of the king, as the upholder of the Constitution, would be naturally strengthened.
Abstract
In this paper, I analyzed the theory of the Compilation of the 「Soktaejŏn」 during the Early Period of the 18th Century. The 「Soktaejŏn」, which was compiled in 1746 (in the 22nd year of King Yŏngjo), on the surface appears to have been designed to cover all the legal changes which had taken place since the 「Kyŏngguk Taechŏn」 was compiled. However, from the standpoint of political thought and of the history of politics, the 「Soktaejŏn」 can also be regarded as having been based on the comprehensive efforts made by Chosŏn society since the 17th century to stabilize the national order, and an effort to embed the new political mechanisms which were undertaken during this period as part of the so-called Tangp'yŏng politics within a code of laws. In compiling 「Soktaejŏn」, King Yŏngjo was designed to secure the monarch more his legitimacy in order to allow him to intervene and to impose compromises between the many factions which were then jostling for position. . The 「Soktaejŏn」was the result of these efforts to search for a new political management system, to strengthen the authority of the king and further the acceptance of constitutionalism. As such, the 「Soktaejŏn」, as a complement to the 「Kyŏngguk Taechŏn」, was meant to promote the usage of the Constitution as a more practical basis through which to rule the country. Once the authority of the 「Kyŏngguk Taechŏn」 was laid out in the Constitution, the authority of the king, as the upholder of the Constitution, would be naturally strengthened.
참고문헌 (46)
- 內藤吉之助, "經國大典의 難産. in: 朝鮮社會法制史硏究" (1932), 岩派書店
- 朝鮮總督府中樞院, "李朝法典考" (1936), 朝鮮總督府
- 朴秉濠, "朝鮮初期의 法源. in: 韓國法制史攷" (1974), 法文社
- 都賢喆, "鄭道傳 '經濟文鑑'의 朱子 글 援用과 그 意圖", 實學思想硏究, 10·11합 (1999)
- 都賢喆, "'經濟文鑑'의 引用典據로 본 鄭道傳의 政治思想", 歷史學報, 165 (2000)
- 林容漢, "朝鮮初期 法典 편찬과 편찬 원리", 한국사상과 문화, 6 (1999)
- 김인호, "여말선초 육전체제의 성립과 전개", 동방학지, (118), pp.1~39 (2002), 국학연구원
- 윤훈표, "經濟六典의 編纂과 主導層의 變化", 동방학지, (121), pp.1~50 (2003), 국학연구원
- 정호훈, "조선전기 法典의 정비와 '經國大典'의 성립. in: 조선 건국과 경국대전 체제의 형성" (2004), 혜안
- 洪順敏, "朝鮮後期 法典 편찬의 推移와 政治運營의 變動", 韓國文化, 21 (1998)
- 김백철, "朝鮮後期 英祖의 蕩平政治 硏究 : '續大典' 편찬과 백성의 재인식", 박사, 국사학과, pp.2009
- 金駿錫, "朝鮮後期 政治思想史硏究" (2003), 지식산업사
- 정호훈, "18세기 전반 蕩平政治의 추진과 <<續大典>>의 편찬", 한국사연구, (127), pp.65~104 (2004), 한국사연구회
- 정만조, "영조대 초반의 탕평책과 탕평파의 활동", 震檀學報, 56 (1983)
- 정만조, "영조대 중반의 정국과 탕평책의 재정립", 歷史學報, 111 (1986)
- 박광용, "朝鮮後期 蕩平 硏究", 박사, 국사학과, pp.1994
- "英祖實錄", ~
- 金東洙, "16-17세기 湖南士林의 存在形態에 대한 一考察 : 특히 鄭介淸의 門人集團과 紫山書院의 置廢事件을 중심으로 하여", 歷史學硏究, 7 (1977)
- 禹仁秀, "鄭汝立 謀逆事件의 眞相과 己丑獄의 性格", 역사교육논집, 12 (1988)
- 정호훈, "朝鮮後期 政治思想 硏究" (2004), 혜안
- 李熙煥, "朝鮮後期 黨爭硏究" (1995), 國學資料院
- 李迎春, "朝鮮後期 王位繼承 硏究" (1998), 集文堂
- 鄭萬祚, "肅宗朝 良役變通論의 展開와 良役對策", 國史館論叢, 17 (1990)
- 정연식, "조선후기 ‘役摠’의 운영과 良役 變通", 박사, 국사학과, pp.1993
- "景宗實錄", ~
- 李鍾範, "1728년 戊申亂의 성격. in: 朝鮮時代 政治史의 再照明" (1985), 범조사
- 정석종, "영조 무신란의 진행과 그 성격. in: 조선후기의 정치와 사상" (1994), 한길사
- 정호훈, "18세기 政治變亂과 蕩平政治. in: 韓國 古代 中世의 支配體制와 農民" (1997), 지식산업사
- "承政院日記", ~
- "霞谷集", ~
- 朴京安, "霞谷 鄭齊斗의 經世論 : '霞谷集' 中 '箚錄'에 대한 一考察", 學林, 10 (1998)
- 鄭在薰, "霞谷 鄭齊斗의 陽明學受容과 經世思想", 韓國史論, 29 (1993)
- 정두영, "18세기 ‘君民一體’思想의 構造와 性格 : 霞谷 鄭齊斗의 經學과 政治運營論을 중심으로", 朝鮮時代史學報, 5 (1998)
- 구덕회, "各司受敎·受敎輯錄·新補受敎輯錄 해제. in: 各司受敎 受敎輯錄 新補受敎輯錄" (1997), 서울대학교 규장각
- "約軒集", ~
- "典錄通考", ~
- 沈載祐, "18세기 獄訟의 성격과 刑政運營의 변화", 韓國史論, 34 (1995)
- 조윤선, "조선후기 소송연구" (2002), 국학자료원
- 조윤선, "英祖代 남형ㆍ혹형 폐지 과정의 실태와 欽恤策에 대한 평가", 조선시대사학보, (48), pp.211~253 (2009), 조선시대사학회
- "雙溪遺稿", ~
- "續大典", ~
- 정호훈, "전통시대 한국 정치사 속의 소통과 화해 -영조대 蕩平政治의 지향과 방법-", 중앙사론, (31), pp.1~41 (2010), 중앙사학연구소
- "常訓", ~
- "仁祖實錄", ~
- 정옥자, "조선후기 조선중화사상 연구" (1998), 일지사
- 김준석, "17세기 正統朱子學派의 政治社會思想 : 宋時烈의 世道政治論과 賦稅制度 釐正策", 東方學志, 67 (1990)