고사기, 이나바의 토끼, 오동도, 하지씨, 하니와
Kojiki, The Hare of Inaba, Odongdo, Hajisi, Haniwa
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
To Japanese people “The Hare of Inaba” is a well known tale, which was recorded in Kojiki, the eighth century records of Japan. Many early researchers had presumed that the tale had come from Korean peninsular but found no evidence whereof. However, since the same tale was found in Odongdo of Yeosu, the theory of introducing from Korea began to gain momentum. Owing to the discovery this article aims to find out the transmitter of the narrative, its transmittee group for investigating the transmission time, and the group's connection with ancient Korea. The results presumed that the group which brought the tale from Korea to Japan must be Haji family of old Japanese. That is because the background of hare tale was the family's seigneury, because Haji family members considered themselves as the transmittees of the hare tale, and because some descendents of the family has the name of Haji-Usagi ((土師兎); Haji-Hare). Moreover, Haji clan orginated from Izumo, which had a close relationship with cultures of Gaya and Shilla of ancient Korea, and ruled the Tottori area as a power group. Especially, the clan as a professional group was entitled to build keyhole-shaped tombs, which were distributed in the Japanese Islands and southern Korea, and create Haniwa (埴輪; terracotta clay figures). As shown in the distribution of keyhole-shaped tombs inside the Korean peninsula, Haji clan maintained a close relationship with southern Korea including Odongdo of Yeosu. It can be presumed that the hare tale was imported from southern Korea to Japan by the clan and inserted into the legend of Ohokuninushi. Thus the hare tale of Kojiki holds a great significance in the history of Korea-Japan relations as a valuable cultural asset.
Abstract
To Japanese people “The Hare of Inaba” is a well known tale, which was recorded in Kojiki, the eighth century records of Japan. Many early researchers had presumed that the tale had come from Korean peninsular but found no evidence whereof. However, since the same tale was found in Odongdo of Yeosu, the theory of introducing from Korea began to gain momentum. Owing to the discovery this article aims to find out the transmitter of the narrative, its transmittee group for investigating the transmission time, and the group's connection with ancient Korea. The results presumed that the group which brought the tale from Korea to Japan must be Haji family of old Japanese. That is because the background of hare tale was the family's seigneury, because Haji family members considered themselves as the transmittees of the hare tale, and because some descendents of the family has the name of Haji-Usagi ((土師兎); Haji-Hare). Moreover, Haji clan orginated from Izumo, which had a close relationship with cultures of Gaya and Shilla of ancient Korea, and ruled the Tottori area as a power group. Especially, the clan as a professional group was entitled to build keyhole-shaped tombs, which were distributed in the Japanese Islands and southern Korea, and create Haniwa (埴輪; terracotta clay figures). As shown in the distribution of keyhole-shaped tombs inside the Korean peninsula, Haji clan maintained a close relationship with southern Korea including Odongdo of Yeosu. It can be presumed that the hare tale was imported from southern Korea to Japan by the clan and inserted into the legend of Ohokuninushi. Thus the hare tale of Kojiki holds a great significance in the history of Korea-Japan relations as a valuable cultural asset.
참고문헌 (34)
- 강인구, "한반도(韓半島) 남부지방(南部地方) 전방후원분(前方後圓墳)의 석실형식(石室型式)과 계보(系譜) -현문시설부석실(玄門施設付石室)을 중심으로-", 백제문화, (35), pp.1~48 (2006), 백제문화연구소
- 노성환, "『古事記』<稻羽의 白兎說話>에 대한 一硏究", 일어일문학연구, 50(2), pp.49~69 (2004), 한국일어일문학회
- 노성환, "대가야국왕자 쯔누가아라시토 전승에 관한 연구", 일어일문학, (38), pp.171~185 (2008), 대한일어일문학회
- 박천수, "榮山江 流域 前方後圓墳을 통해 본 5~6세기 韓半島와 日本列島", 백제연구, (43), pp.25~59 (2006), 백제연구소
- 사천시, "사천", 사천시 문화관광과, 30~ (2008)
- 우재병, "영산강유역 전방후원분의 출현과 그 배경", 호서고고학, (10), pp.77~ (2004), 호서고고학회
- 이조민속야담연구회, "고금소총", pp.195~197 (1980), 대일서관
- 河上邦彦, "일본 전방후원분과 횡혈식 석실", 백제연구, (31), pp.100~ (2000), 충남대 백제연구소
- 츠지 히데토, "榮山江流域의 前方後圓墳과 倭國 周緣地域의 前方後圓墳", 백제연구, (44), pp.211~244 (2006), 백제연구소
- 石破洋, "兎神考, In イナバノシロウサギ綜合硏究" (2000), 牧野出版
- 石破洋, "イナバノシロウサギ神話の周辺", 国語国文, (31), pp.59~ (2006), 金沢大学
- 井上實, "出雲和爾傳說私考, In 武庫川女子大學紀要(6) 人文科學編", pp.86~ (1958), 武庫川女子大學
- 宇治谷孟, "日本書紀", pp.146~147 (1990), 講談社
- 宇治谷孟, "日本書紀(下)", pp.103~ (1990), 講談社
- 大林太良, "北の神神. 南の英雄", pp.82~ (1995), 小學館
- 大久間喜一郞, "古事記の比較說話學", pp.92~ (1995), 雄山閣
- シロウサギの世界 -白兎はどこからきたの-, "門田眞知子", 鳥取大学, 9~10 (2011)
- 金達壽, "日本の中の朝鮮文化 (4)-因幡, 伯耆 <鳥取縣(1)>-", 季刊三千里, (33), pp.178~187 (1983), 三千里社
- 君島久子, "アジアの民話" (1981), 講談社
- 君島久子, "因幡のワニ", 日中文化硏究, (2), pp.106~ (1991), 勉誠社
- 倉野憲司, "古事記全註釋(3)", pp.200~ (1976), 三省堂
- 楜胡厚生, "すすきの穂と兎", アジア遊学, (19), pp.163~164 (2000), 勉誠出版
- 小島瓔禮, "オホクニヌシと因幡の白兎, In 因幡の白兎神話の謎 <門田真知子編>", pp.199~ (2008), 今井出版
- 全浩天, "朝鮮からみた古代日本", pp.64~ (1989), 未來社
- 中島利一郞, "我が上代文化の東洋言語學的背景, In 東洋言語學の建設", pp.77~78 (1941), 古今書院
- 中西進, "天つ神の世界 -古事記をよむ-", pp.229~230 (1985), 角川書店
- 西岡秀雄, "兎と鰐説話の伝播(上)(下)", 史学, (29), pp.36~37 (1956), 三田史学会
- 西宮一民, "稻羽の素兎と和爾, In 皇學館大學紀要(16)", pp.6~ (1978), 皇學館大學
- 松本信廣, "和爾の名義", 國語と國文學, (10), pp.22~ (1949), 東京大學國語國文學會.
- 松村一男, "大國主傳說と出雲神話, In 海と列島文化(2)-日本海と出雲世界", pp.204~ (1991), 小學館
- 三谷榮一, "日本神話の基盤", pp.193~ (1984), 槁書房
- 野津龍, "因幡の白兎伝説の誕生", 鳥取大学教育学部研究報告人文.社会科学, 36(2), pp.99~ (1985), 鳥取大学 教育学部
- 魯成煥, "稻羽の白兎說話と韓國 梧桐島の傳說" (2004), 古事記學會
- 依田千百子, "韓國の兎と龜の葛藤譚, In 因幡の白兎神話の謎", pp.85~ (2008), 今井出版