결과발생시의 행위와 결과사이의 미수범평가
A evaluation of attempt between actions and results in the japanese criminal law
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to find out if you've already been experiencing the results, how attempt between actions and results are evaluated in the japanese criminal law. It is impossible for actions that have already been established to affect crime in the japanese criminal law. this is concurrence of mens rea with actus reus. The results show that as follow: Firstly, if you act at the initiation of criminal intent, that has already been established, attempted benefits is possible after the foundation of the evaluation of crime except for the third elements. Secondly, if the crime on the results weighted must be construed in the form of a single crime. Therefore, the basic crime and serious attempt by the results of separation may be granted benefits. Thirdly, if the no really manual criminal actor crime construed in the form of a single crime, we have to make full use of reduction of human punishment, and the negation of the objective attribution etc.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find out if you've already been experiencing the results, how attempt between actions and results are evaluated in the japanese criminal law. It is impossible for actions that have already been established to affect crime in the japanese criminal law. this is concurrence of mens rea with actus reus. The results show that as follow: Firstly, if you act at the initiation of criminal intent, that has already been established, attempted benefits is possible after the foundation of the evaluation of crime except for the third elements. Secondly, if the crime on the results weighted must be construed in the form of a single crime. Therefore, the basic crime and serious attempt by the results of separation may be granted benefits. Thirdly, if the no really manual criminal actor crime construed in the form of a single crime, we have to make full use of reduction of human punishment, and the negation of the objective attribution etc.
참고문헌 (13)
- 宮內裕, "危險槪念について", 滝川幸辰先生還曆記念現代刑法学の課題(下), pp.744~755 (1955)
- 內田文昭, "刑法各論(第2版)", pp.28~39 (1984), 成文堂
- 大谷實, "刑法講義総論(第4版補正版)", pp.392~400 (1996), 創文社
- 山中敬, "中止犯, In 現代刑法講座5", pp.369~370 (1982), 成文堂
- 森住信人, "未遂処罰の理論的構造", pp.3~7 (2007), 專修大学出版局
- 城下裕二, "中止未遂における必要的減免について", 北大法学, 36(4), pp.173~180 (1986)
- 小野淸一郞, "刑法総則草案と中止犯, In 刑罰の本質について·その他", pp.275~285 (1955), 有斐閣
- 小林憲太郞, "いわゆる一般的生活危険について", 千葉大学法学論集, 16(3), pp.67~77 (2001)
- 町田行男, "中止未遂の理論", pp.150~ (2005), 現代人文社
- 中山硏一, "口述刑法総論(第3版)", pp.306~312 (1994), 成文堂
- 平野龍一, "中止犯, In 刑事法硏究 第2卷", pp.149~ (1981), 有斐閣
- 香川違夫, "中止未遂の法的性格", pp.128~ (1963), 有斐閣
- 丸山雅夫, "結果的加重犯論", pp.34~47 (1990), 成文堂