18세기 『소학』류 서적의 새로운 양상 -『大東小學』과 『東賢學則』에 대한 검토-
New Traits featured in Sohak-based publications of the 18th century - Examination of Daedong Sohak and Dong’hyeon Hakchik -
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Examined in this article are the new Sohak-based publications (“Continuations”) that emerged in the 18th century, which let us have a glimpse into the internal discussions and aspirations of the academic circle of Joseon. Analyzed in particular are Daedong Sohak and Dong’hyeon Hakchik, which were also the very first ones to be published in their kind and were eventually followed by many other Sohak incarnations. These two books, as they were both based on Ju Hi’s original Sohak, generally featured basic similarities, while also displaying distinctive differences from each other. As they were authored(and compiled) respectively by a Westerner and a Southerner, they tended to quote writings of other members of their own schools, creating stark differences from each other in both priorities and nuances. Added to that, while Daedong Sohak placed an emphasis upon the importance of establishing and maintaining a ‘paternal’ clan order by elaborating upon the meaning and boundaries of the concept of filial piety, Dong’hyeon Hakchik reflected a mind set of honoring ‘both’ parents and at the same time synchronizing filial piety obligations with obligatory loyalty that should be observed in a king-vassal relationship, as we can see from its citing of ‘extraordinary stories’ and also its keen interest in actual execution of one’s intentions In the meantime, both books, which were all composed of contents that had been inside the ‘Outer section’ of Ju Hi’s original Sohak, which contained ‘Memorable Words’ and ‘Benevolent Deeds,’ reflected the atmosphere of the time by filling themselves dominantly with “Joseon stories” which were expected to inspire and enlighten the Joseon readers much more easily and effectively.
Abstract
Examined in this article are the new Sohak-based publications (“Continuations”) that emerged in the 18th century, which let us have a glimpse into the internal discussions and aspirations of the academic circle of Joseon. Analyzed in particular are Daedong Sohak and Dong’hyeon Hakchik, which were also the very first ones to be published in their kind and were eventually followed by many other Sohak incarnations. These two books, as they were both based on Ju Hi’s original Sohak, generally featured basic similarities, while also displaying distinctive differences from each other. As they were authored(and compiled) respectively by a Westerner and a Southerner, they tended to quote writings of other members of their own schools, creating stark differences from each other in both priorities and nuances. Added to that, while Daedong Sohak placed an emphasis upon the importance of establishing and maintaining a ‘paternal’ clan order by elaborating upon the meaning and boundaries of the concept of filial piety, Dong’hyeon Hakchik reflected a mind set of honoring ‘both’ parents and at the same time synchronizing filial piety obligations with obligatory loyalty that should be observed in a king-vassal relationship, as we can see from its citing of ‘extraordinary stories’ and also its keen interest in actual execution of one’s intentions In the meantime, both books, which were all composed of contents that had been inside the ‘Outer section’ of Ju Hi’s original Sohak, which contained ‘Memorable Words’ and ‘Benevolent Deeds,’ reflected the atmosphere of the time by filling themselves dominantly with “Joseon stories” which were expected to inspire and enlighten the Joseon readers much more easily and effectively.
참고문헌 (38)
- 노관범, "19세기 후반 淸道 지역 南人學者의 학문과 『小學』의 대중화: 진계 박재형의 『해동속소학』을 중심으로", 韓國學報, 27, pp.107~110 (2001)
- 서성우, "『小學』續編類에 關한 硏究 : 『東賢學則』·『海東續小學』·『大東小學』을 中心으로", 석사, 한문교육전공, pp.2013
- 김연신, "18세기 초학교재 《동현학칙》 연구", 석사, 한문교육, pp.2003
- 황봉덕, "兪直基의 『大東嘉言善行』 硏究", 동양고전연구, (58), pp.41~71 (2015), 동양고전학회[DOI]
- 兪直基, "大東嘉言善行", 국립중앙도서관소장, 한古朝57-가605, ~
- "大東小學(古 1256-35)", 국립중앙도서관 소장본, ~
- 李德懋, "士小節", ~
- 李圭景, "『五洲衍文長箋散稿』, 「小學」", ~
- 金亨在, "『大東小學』, 「凡例」", ~
- 조성산, "조선후기 낙론계 학풍의 형성과 전개" (2007), 지식산업사
- "日省錄 영조 38년 8월 癸巳", ~
- "正祖實錄", ~
- 兪彥鎬, "『燕石』 六冊, 「墓誌銘․伯氏參議府君墓誌」", ~
- 이봉규, "金長生, 金集의 禮學과 元宗追崇論爭의 철학사적 의미", 韓國思想史學, 11, pp.242~243 (1998)
- 이정민, "閔愼 代服 사건의 쟁점과 의미", 진단학보, (123), pp.55~82 (2015), 진단학회
- "東賢學則", ~
- "『下廬先生文集』, 「附錄․行狀」", ~
- 이정민, "조선시대의 『小學』 이해 연구", 박사, 국사학과, pp.2013
- 安鼎福, "順菴集", ~
- "小學", ~
- 安鼎福, "『下學指南』, 「序文」", ~
- 李縡, "『檢身錄』, 「序文」", ~
- 李德懋, "靑莊館全書", ~
- 丁若鏞, "茶山詩文集"
- 安鼎福, "順庵集』 권23, 「墓誌·處士南君墓誌銘」", ~
- 김상준, "온 나라가 양반되기 - 조선 후기 유교적 평등화 메커니즘", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (63), pp.1~29 (2003), 한국사회사학회
- 구희진, "19세기 중반 儒者들의 普通敎育論 과 童蒙書 편찬", 역사교육, (92), pp.159~195 (2004), 역사교육연구회
- 金長生, "沙溪全書 권5", ~
- 李瀷, "小學疾書", ~
- 조성산, "18세기 후반~19세기 중반 朝鮮 세시풍속서 서술의 특징과 의의 - ‘中國’ 인식의 문제를 중심으로 -", 조선시대사학보, (60), pp.183~221 (2012), 조선시대사학회
- 도현철, "목재 홍여하의 역사서 편찬과 고려사 인식", 한국사상사학, (43), pp.51~83 (2013), 한국사상사학회
- 허태용, "조선후기 중화론과 역사인식" (2009), 아카넷
- 정옥자, "조선후기 중화사상연구" (1998), 일지사
- 洪大容, "『湛軒集』 外集 권1, 「杭傳尺牘·與秋書」", ~
- "『順菴先生文集』 권25, 「孝子安公行狀」", ~
- "英祖實錄", ~
- 李象靖, "『大山集』 권14, 「書·與申君晦」", ~
- 李瀷, "『星湖全集』 권47, 「雜著·鄧伯道論」", ~
