을미사변을 둘러싼 기억과 의문 ― 명성황후 암살자에 관한 기록과 추적 ―
A Question of Memory for the 1895 Queen Min Assassination (Eulmi Incident)
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Eulmiincident(1895) refers to the assassination of Queen Min, which was committed by a gang of Japanese and Korean criminals who broke into Gyeongbok palace, under the order of the Japanese diplomatic minister in Korea, Miura Gorō (三浦梧樓), and killed the Queen on October 8, 1895. Despite being extensively studied by modern Korean historians, their examinations of this tragic incident have mostly concentrated on the secret and meticulous planning by the Japanese of the assassination, the cruelty of their actions, and how tragically the Queen met her death. Previously, Japanese historians avoided dealing with this Eulmi incident issue, as it was a shameful act executed by their own people. Although they have tried to elaborate on how the incident itself unfolded, records created by central characters such as Miura (三浦梧樓), Sugimura (杉村濬), Gikuchi (菊池謙讓) and Gobayakawa (小早川秀雄), who were all directly related to the incident, were mainly consulted. These figures mostly attributed the Daeweon-gun as being behind the Eulmi incident and planningall the details. Yet in the 1960s, Yamabe (山邊健太郞) revealed that the Japanese minister Miura, who was serving in Korea at the time, had planned the assassination and that the Japanese garrison in Korea was used for the operation. Furthermore, in the 1980s, the Korean historian Park Jong-Geun, who lives in Japan, proved in his studies that Japanese minister Miura planned the assassination and executed his plan by mobilizing Japanese troops, diplomats, the consulate, police, and assassins. Modern Japanese historians agree that minister Miura planned and implemented the assassination of Queen Min, but acted without any higher authority. Studies that support this view of the incident are based on Japanese diplomatic documents and other memoirs written by Japanese people, and their position clearly shows the intention to place blame only on the diplomatic legation in Korea and no one else.
Abstract
Eulmiincident(1895) refers to the assassination of Queen Min, which was committed by a gang of Japanese and Korean criminals who broke into Gyeongbok palace, under the order of the Japanese diplomatic minister in Korea, Miura Gorō (三浦梧樓), and killed the Queen on October 8, 1895. Despite being extensively studied by modern Korean historians, their examinations of this tragic incident have mostly concentrated on the secret and meticulous planning by the Japanese of the assassination, the cruelty of their actions, and how tragically the Queen met her death. Previously, Japanese historians avoided dealing with this Eulmi incident issue, as it was a shameful act executed by their own people. Although they have tried to elaborate on how the incident itself unfolded, records created by central characters such as Miura (三浦梧樓), Sugimura (杉村濬), Gikuchi (菊池謙讓) and Gobayakawa (小早川秀雄), who were all directly related to the incident, were mainly consulted. These figures mostly attributed the Daeweon-gun as being behind the Eulmi incident and planningall the details. Yet in the 1960s, Yamabe (山邊健太郞) revealed that the Japanese minister Miura, who was serving in Korea at the time, had planned the assassination and that the Japanese garrison in Korea was used for the operation. Furthermore, in the 1980s, the Korean historian Park Jong-Geun, who lives in Japan, proved in his studies that Japanese minister Miura planned the assassination and executed his plan by mobilizing Japanese troops, diplomats, the consulate, police, and assassins. Modern Japanese historians agree that minister Miura planned and implemented the assassination of Queen Min, but acted without any higher authority. Studies that support this view of the incident are based on Japanese diplomatic documents and other memoirs written by Japanese people, and their position clearly shows the intention to place blame only on the diplomatic legation in Korea and no one else.
참고문헌 (68)
- 김영수, "을미사변, 그 하루의 기록 ―대원군의 침묵과 명성황후암살의 배후―", 이화사학연구, (39), pp.193~225 (2009), 이화사학연구소
- 김영수, "세레진 사바찐의 하루-을미사변에 관한 기억과 선택", 역사비평, (91), pp.329~362 (2010), 역사문제연구소
- 山辺健太郎, "乙未の変について, In 日韓関係の展開", pp.74~ (1963), 日本国際政治学会
- 朴宗根, "日淸戰爭と朝鮮" (1982), 靑木書店
- 신국주, "명성황후살해에 대한 재평가, In 명성황후시해사건과 아관파천기의 국제관계" (1998), 동림사
- 市川正明, "｢宮內大臣殺傷容疑者判明ノ件, 明治28年11月22日｣, 春田憲兵司令官→兒玉陸軍次官, In 日韓外交史料(5)：韓國王妃殺害事件", 原書房, 231~ (1981)
- Пак Б.Б, "Российская дипломатия и Корея(제정러시아 외교와 한국)", pp.139~ (2002)
- 최문형, "명성황후 시해의 진실을 밝힌다" (2006), 지식산업사
- 최문형, "한국 근대의 세계사적 이해", pp.109~113 (2010), 지식산업사
- 강창일, "근대 일본의 조선침략과 대아시아주의" (2003), 역사비평사
- 金文子, "朝鮮王妃殺害と日本人", pp.228~256 (2009), 高文硏
- 강범석, "왕후 모살", pp.303~ (2010), 솔
- АВПРИ(대외정책문서보관소), "Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.6.Л.60об", ~
- АВПРИ, "Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.6.Л.66", ~
- "F.O. 405. Part Ⅵ. Inclosure in 10 No.111", 91~
- АВПРИ, "Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.6.Л.71", ~
- "NARA. Despatches from U.S. Ministers to Korea 1895-1896, M.134 Roll.12 Enclose 3 No.157", ~
- "궁궐수비대, His M's Body-guard", ~
- "韓國政府顧問たりし石塚よ り王妃事件の眞相を報告 末松法制局長宛石塚英藏書簡, 明治28年 10月 9日", ~
- "朝鮮 王妃事件關係資料", 6~7
- "日本國會圖書館 憲政資料室, ｢546號 伊東伯爵家文書｣", ~
- АВПРИ, "Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.6.Л.71об", ~
- "F.O. 405. Part Ⅵ. Inclosure in 6-1 No.112", 96~
- "駐韓日本公使館記錄", ~
- 鄭喬, "大韓季年史, 上" (1957)
- 小早川秀雄, "閔后暗殺" (1962), 筑摩書房
- 小早 川秀雄, "閔后暗殺記" (1965), 汎文社
- АВПРИ, "Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.6.Л.68", ~
- АВПРИ, "Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.6.Л.76", ~
- "開國五百四年八月事變報告書, In 韓國王妃殺害事件", pp.441~ (1987), 高麗書林
- "NARA. Despatches from U.S. Ministers to Korea 1895-1896, M.134 Roll.12 No.156", ~
- 開國五百四年八月事變報告書, In 韓國王妃殺害事件, "市川正明", ~
- 이민원, "명성황후시해와 아관파천", pp.91~ (2002), 국학자료원
- 뮈텔, "뮈텔주교 일기" (1985)
- АВПРИ, "Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.6.Л.88", ~
- АВПРИ, "Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.6.Л.70", ~
- АВПРИ, "Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.6.Л.72", ~
- "Унтербергер, Современное С остояние Корейскаго Вопроса, январь 1898, Л.116 (Российский Государств енный Исторический Αрхивб Фонд 560 опись 28 дело 24 1895～1906гг", ~
- 헐버트, "대한제국멸망사", pp.173~ (2006), 집문당
- "한말정객의 회고담", 동아일보, ~ (1930)
- АВПРИ, "Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.6.Л.72об", ~
- "North China Herald", ~ (1895)
- "高宗實錄", ~
- 宗簿寺, "璿源系譜紀略", 65~ (1908)
- АВПРИ, "Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.6.Л.132об", ~
- АВПРИ, "Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.6.Л.60", ~
- АВПРИ, "Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.6.Л.67", ~
- "F.O. 405. Part Ⅷ. Inclosure 6 No.15", ~
- 朴日根, "近代 韓國關係 英ㆍ美ㆍ中 外交資料 集", pp.753~ (1984), 釜山大學校
- "(在朝鮮內地人)紳士名鑑", pp.146~ (1917), 朝鮮公論社
- "朝鮮總督府官報 43호", ~ (1910)
- 朝鮮中央經濟會, "京城市民名鑑", pp.100~ (1922), 朝鮮中央經濟會
- 日本外務省, "永田(中佐)→寺內(少將), 電報, In 日本의 韓國侵略史料叢書, 21卷", pp.109~ (1988), 韓國出版文化院
- 최혜주, "조선잡기", pp.202~ (2008), 김영사
- "內部來去案", ~
- 嚴達煥 등의 귀국활동 보고서, , ~ (1902)
- 小早川秀雄, "閔后暗殺記", 109~ (1965)
- 高等裁判所, "開國五百四年八月事變報告書, 建陽元 年四月十五日, 5, 藏書閣-고도서-史部-雜史類", ~
- "Унтербергер, Современное Состояние Корейскаго Вопроса, январь 1898(РГИΑ Ф.560 Оп.28 Д.24 Л.116об", ~
- 開國五百四年八月事變報告書, In 韓國王妃殺害事件, "市川正明", 449~450
- 山邊健太郞, "閔妃事件について", コリア評論, (5), pp.51~52 (1964)
- "오마이뉴스", ~ (2002)
- "承政院日記", ~
- "日本國會圖書館 憲政資料室, ｢ 546號 伊東伯爵家文書｣", ~
- 혜문, "조선을 죽이다", pp.238~ (2009), 동국대학교출판부
- "韓國政府顧問たりし石塚よ り王妃事件の眞相を報告, 末松法制局長宛石塚英藏書簡, 明治28年 10月 9日", ~
- "朝鮮 王妃事件關係資料", 6~7
- АВПРИ, "Ф.150.Оп.493.Д.6.Л.87", ~