府를 통해 본 9세기 신라의 지방제도 개편과 의미: 「月光寺圓朗禪師塔碑」의 사례를 중심으로
The Establishment of Pu(府), the Reform of the Local System through in the 9th Century of Silla
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the 9th and 10th centuries, Pu(府) was established in Silla. This fact is noted as a result of the reform of the local system during the chaos of the late Silla Period. However, there is an example of Pu whose name is unknown. So there is a controversy about the location and character of pu. Therefore, I would like to analyze the rubbing of a stele and reveal the name of Pu. As a result, it will be possible to understand the relationship between Sogyŏng(小京) and Pu and the change in the status of Sogyŏng in the local system of Silla. Wŏlgwangsa wŏllang sŏnsa t’appi(月光寺圓朗禪師塔碑, The funerary stele of Sŏn Master wŏllang at Wŏlgwang Monastery) was erected in 890. □□江府 and T’onghwa-pu(通化府) recorded here is not found in historical records. Looking at the rubbing of □□江府, it is estimated that the second letter of the unboxes is close to Han(漢). In other words, the unknown name is presumed to be □江府. The center of □江府 is estimated to be Ch’ungju(忠州), Wŏnju(原州), or Chech’ŏn(堤川) near the middle and upper reaches of the Namhangang River(南漢江). Among these, I thought there was a high possibility of Ch’ungju. Wŏraksan Mountain, where Wŏlgwang Monastery was located, belonged to Sayŏli-hyŏn(沙熱伊縣) during the Silla period. This area is close to Ch’ungju and was later included in Ch’ungjumok(忠州牧) during the Koryŏ Dynasty. □江府 can be seen as another name for Chungwŏn-pu(中原府) which is the name when Chungwŏn’gyŏng(中原京), one of the five Sogyŏng of Silla, was reorganized into pu. Sogyŏng is estimated to be about the size of a Kun(郡) with two to three Hyŏn(縣). And Sogyŏng consisted of the central part of the castle and several surrounding villages. However, in 890, the area of Wŏraksan Mountain, which originally belonged to Naeje-kun(柰堤郡), belonged to □江府. This shows that when Chungwŏn’gyŏng was reorganized into Chungwŏn-pu, the area of jurisdiction of pu became wider than that of Sogyŏng. It is estimated that Chungwŏn’gyŏng was reorganized into Chungwŏn-pu between 822 and 836. Rebellion of Kim Hŏn-ch'ang(金憲昌) in 822 is drawing attention as the background. It is believed that local residents who were dissatisfied with Silla’s ruling system also participated in the rebellion. It is estimated that the residents of Sogyŏng, who had Kolp’um(骨品, Bone rank) and Kwandŭng(官等, Bureaucratic rank), also participated in the rebellion. Because they would also have been discriminated against by the ruling class of the capital. By reorganizing Sogyŏng into Pu, Silla government would have wanted to quell local complaints. Pu was an independent administrative unit, unlike Sogyŏng. The status of the region has been promoted. In addition, local residents would have been given local and military posts. This measure could have stabilized the local community a little. On the other hand, Silla society would have taken the path of local independence.
Abstract
In the 9th and 10th centuries, Pu(府) was established in Silla. This fact is noted as a result of the reform of the local system during the chaos of the late Silla Period. However, there is an example of Pu whose name is unknown. So there is a controversy about the location and character of pu. Therefore, I would like to analyze the rubbing of a stele and reveal the name of Pu. As a result, it will be possible to understand the relationship between Sogyŏng(小京) and Pu and the change in the status of Sogyŏng in the local system of Silla. Wŏlgwangsa wŏllang sŏnsa t’appi(月光寺圓朗禪師塔碑, The funerary stele of Sŏn Master wŏllang at Wŏlgwang Monastery) was erected in 890. □□江府 and T’onghwa-pu(通化府) recorded here is not found in historical records. Looking at the rubbing of □□江府, it is estimated that the second letter of the unboxes is close to Han(漢). In other words, the unknown name is presumed to be □江府. The center of □江府 is estimated to be Ch’ungju(忠州), Wŏnju(原州), or Chech’ŏn(堤川) near the middle and upper reaches of the Namhangang River(南漢江). Among these, I thought there was a high possibility of Ch’ungju. Wŏraksan Mountain, where Wŏlgwang Monastery was located, belonged to Sayŏli-hyŏn(沙熱伊縣) during the Silla period. This area is close to Ch’ungju and was later included in Ch’ungjumok(忠州牧) during the Koryŏ Dynasty. □江府 can be seen as another name for Chungwŏn-pu(中原府) which is the name when Chungwŏn’gyŏng(中原京), one of the five Sogyŏng of Silla, was reorganized into pu. Sogyŏng is estimated to be about the size of a Kun(郡) with two to three Hyŏn(縣). And Sogyŏng consisted of the central part of the castle and several surrounding villages. However, in 890, the area of Wŏraksan Mountain, which originally belonged to Naeje-kun(柰堤郡), belonged to □江府. This shows that when Chungwŏn’gyŏng was reorganized into Chungwŏn-pu, the area of jurisdiction of pu became wider than that of Sogyŏng. It is estimated that Chungwŏn’gyŏng was reorganized into Chungwŏn-pu between 822 and 836. Rebellion of Kim Hŏn-ch'ang(金憲昌) in 822 is drawing attention as the background. It is believed that local residents who were dissatisfied with Silla’s ruling system also participated in the rebellion. It is estimated that the residents of Sogyŏng, who had Kolp’um(骨品, Bone rank) and Kwandŭng(官等, Bureaucratic rank), also participated in the rebellion. Because they would also have been discriminated against by the ruling class of the capital. By reorganizing Sogyŏng into Pu, Silla government would have wanted to quell local complaints. Pu was an independent administrative unit, unlike Sogyŏng. The status of the region has been promoted. In addition, local residents would have been given local and military posts. This measure could have stabilized the local community a little. On the other hand, Silla society would have taken the path of local independence.
참고문헌 (58)
- 旗田巍, "朝鮮中世社會史の硏究" (1972), 法政大學出版社
- 禹漢興, "新羅下代의 府에 대한 硏究", 석사, 사학, pp.1989
- 배종도, "新羅下代의 地方制度 개편에 대한 고찰", 學林, 11 (1989)
- 黃善榮, "나말여초 정치제도사 연구" (2002), 국학자료원
- 徐毅植, "新羅의 政治構造와 身分編制" (2010), 혜안
- 윤경진, "고려 군현제의 구조와 운영", 박사, 국사학, pp.2000
- 崔準祐, "나말여초 김해부의 설치와 위상변화", 석사, pp.2017
- 조혜정, "新羅 下代 府의 설치와 그 의의", 석사, pp.2018
- 조혜정, "新羅 下代 府의 설치와 그 의의 - 後三國期 이전 사례를 중심으로 -", 신라문화, 56, pp.35~60 (2020), 신라문화연구소[DOI]
- "世宗實錄 卷149, 地理志 忠淸道 忠州牧", ~
- "三國史記", ~
- 홍영호, "新羅의 何瑟羅 經營 硏究", pp.44~71 (2016), 景仁文化社
- 전덕재, "牛首州의 설치와 변천에 관한 고찰", 강원문화연구, 28, pp.91~94 (2009)
- 尹星鎬, "新羅의 漢江流域 領域化 過程 硏究", 박사, pp.2017
- "韶濩堂文集 卷8, 雜言4 任子", ~
- 이도학, "『三國史記』 溫達傳의 出典 摸索", 동아시아고대학, (45), pp.9~38 (2017), 동아시아고대학회
- 蔡美夏, "신라 국가제사와 왕권" (2008), 혜안
- 木村誠, "古代朝鮮の國家と社會", pp.48~49 (2004), 吉川弘文館
- 金泰植, "三國史記의 原典 檢討" (1995), 韓國精神文化硏究院
- "高麗史", ~
- 전덕재, "『三國史記』 祭祀志의 原典과 編纂", 한국고대사연구, (94), pp.235~266 (2019), 한국고대사학회[DOI]
- 이우태, "신라서원소경연구", pp.234~235 (2001), 서경
- 兼若逸之, "新羅≪均田成冊≫의 分析을 통해서 본 村落支配의 實態", 박사, 사학, pp.1985
- 李仁哲, "新羅村落社會史硏究", pp.110~111 (1996), 一志社
- 양기석, "新羅 西原小京 硏究", pp.99~100 (2001), 서경
- 李仁哲, "新羅政治制度史硏究", pp.215~217 (1993), 一志社
- 이인재, "북원경과 남한강 불교문화", pp.93~94 (2016), 혜안
- 鄭求福, "譯註 三國史記 4 주석편 (하)" (1997), 韓國精神文化硏究院
- 박종진, "고려시기 지방제도 연구", pp.147~171 (2017), 서울대학교 출판문화원
- 宋基豪, "강좌 한국고대사 제7권, 촌락과 도시" (2002), 재단법인 가락국사적개발연구원
- 주진학, "체국경야의 도: 중국 행정구획의 연혁" (2017), 영남대학교 출판부
- "舊唐書 卷8", ~
- "唐六典", ~
- "新唐書 卷49下, 百官志4下", ~
- 전덕재, "新羅 소경의 설치와 그 기능", 진단학보, (93), pp.29~56 (2002), 진단학회
- 藤田亮策, "朝鮮學論考", pp.354~ (1963), 藤田先生記念事業會
- 田中俊明, "古代の日本と渡來の文化", pp.213~214 (1997), 學生社
- 韓基汶, "高麗寺院의 構造와 機能", pp.365~366 (1998), 民族社
- 의 뜻, "동아시아문화연구", 2018, 13~50, pp.동아시아문화연구소, 10.16959[DOI]
- 井上秀雄, "新羅史基礎硏究", pp.80~84 (1974), 東出版
- 윤경진, "『三國史記』地理志의 기준 시점과 연혁 오류", 한국사연구, (156), pp.1~44 (2012), 한국사연구회
- 윤경진, "高麗史 地理志의 分析과 補正", pp.6~21 (2012), 여유당
- 전덕재, "『三國史記』 地理志의 原典과 編纂 -新羅志를 중심으로-", 대구사학, 129, pp.183~238 (2017), 대구사학회[DOI]
- 주보돈, "新羅 下代 金憲昌의 亂과 그 性格", 한국고대사연구, (51), pp.233~279 (2008), 한국고대사학회
- 신성재, "9세기 전반의 新羅 政治社會와 張保皐勢力", 學林, 24, pp.11~ (2003)
- 林炳泰, "新羅小京考", 歷史學報, 35ㆍ36 (1967)
- "三國遺事 卷第2", ~
- 李基白, "新羅政治社會史硏究", pp.44~ (1974), 一潮閣
- 하일식, "신라 왕경인의 지방 이주와 編籍地", 신라문화, 38, pp.187~222 (2011), 신라문화연구소
- 韓基汶, "韓國中世社會의 諸問題", pp.692~695 (2001), 한국중세사학회
- 정선종, "實相寺 秀澈和尙塔碑의 陰記와 重建에 대하여", 불교문화연구, 11, pp.176~ (2009)
- 최경선, "「영원사수철화상비」의 판독과 찬자(撰者)·서자(書者)에 대한 검토", 역사와 현실, (101), pp.201~236 (2016), 한국역사연구회
- 김택민, "譯註 唐六典, 下", pp.448~ (2008), 신서원
- "續日本後紀 권11", ~
- 蔡尙植, "羅末麗初 忠州 지역의 豪族과 禪宗: 淨土寺址 法鏡大師碑 陰記의 分析", 蘂城文化, 16ㆍ17 (1996)
- 하일식, "고려초기 지방사회의 주관과 관반: 금석문 자료 분석을 통한 시론적 해석", 역사와 현실, 34 (1999)
- 정요근, "후삼국시기 고려의 ‘주(州)’·‘부(府)’ 분포와 그 설치 의미", 역사와 현실, (73), pp.159~200 (2009), 한국역사연구회
