『제3의 현장』과 추리소설의 문법
“The third scene of the crime” and a rule of ‘mystery novel’
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
『The third scene of the crime』 comparatively has the key elements of ‘mystery novels’, such as crime, reasoning of detective, reconstruction of the narrative and completion of the narrative. Therefore, this novels can be read by the method of ‘Detective novels’ reading. However, from a detective novels’s point of view, this novel violates the core laws of detective novels that the investigating the case detective is a suspect as well as the victim and reconstruction of the crime by ‘Baek nam-hui’ is denied, cause of the wrong reasoning of ‘prosecutor O(오검사)’. The author tells about the crash between the different characters’ desire interpret the case and reconstruction the narrative. These facts is deepening by the technique of the mystery novels, because in ‘mystery novels’, it is very important to trace characters’ thoughts and actions. In this novels the author used all kinds of mystery novels, while he raise a heavy question about the firm system that we have no clear investigation by detectives, and even revealed the truth are buried by the pretense of rational logic. It is regarded a question about the modern times as the representation of mystery novels.
Abstract
『The third scene of the crime』 comparatively has the key elements of ‘mystery novels’, such as crime, reasoning of detective, reconstruction of the narrative and completion of the narrative. Therefore, this novels can be read by the method of ‘Detective novels’ reading. However, from a detective novels’s point of view, this novel violates the core laws of detective novels that the investigating the case detective is a suspect as well as the victim and reconstruction of the crime by ‘Baek nam-hui’ is denied, cause of the wrong reasoning of ‘prosecutor O(오검사)’. The author tells about the crash between the different characters’ desire interpret the case and reconstruction the narrative. These facts is deepening by the technique of the mystery novels, because in ‘mystery novels’, it is very important to trace characters’ thoughts and actions. In this novels the author used all kinds of mystery novels, while he raise a heavy question about the firm system that we have no clear investigation by detectives, and even revealed the truth are buried by the pretense of rational logic. It is regarded a question about the modern times as the representation of mystery novels.
참고문헌 (24)
- T. 토도로프, "탐정소설의 유형, In 산문의 시학", pp.49~51 (1992), 문예출판사
- 권택영, "李淸俊 소설의 중층구조, In 異敎徒의 聖歌" (1998), 나남출판사
- 김병익, "왜 글을 쓰는가?, In 이청준" (1979), 은애
- 김영성, "이청준 초기 소설의 서사구조 연구", 석사, pp.1999
- 김영성, "한국 현대소설의 추리소설적 서사구조 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 김학균, "염상섭 소설 다시 읽기", pp.26~ (2009), 한국학술정보
- 김홍중, "추리소설의 발생에 관한 문학사회학적 연구", 석사, pp.1998
- 대중문화연구회, "추리소설이란 무엇인가?" (1997), 국학자료원
- 류보선, "새로운 방향의 모색과 운명의 힘, In 이청준 깊이 읽기" (1999), 문학과 지성사
- 유영소, "삐딱하게 보기" (1995), 시각과 언어
- 이동연, "즐거운 살인" (2001), 이후출판사
- 오생근, "갇혀 있는 者의 視線, In 이청준 깊이 읽기" (1999), 문학과 지성사
- 윤미화, "추리소설의 현대적 변용 연구", 석사, pp.2005
- 이브 뢰테르, "추리소설" (2000), 문학과지성사
- 이수형, "이청준 소설에 나타난 교환 관계 양상 연구", 박사, pp.2007
- 이청준, "영혼의 飛翔鶴을 위한 自由主義者의 소설 탐색", 문학정신, (42), pp.37~ (1990)
- 이청준, "제3의 현장", pp.9~ (1983), 동화출판공사
- 이청준, "작가 후기: 공리적 설명어와 심정적 고백어, In 제3의 현장", pp.272~273 (1999), 열림원
- 이현석, "이청준 소설의 서사시학 연구", 박사, pp.2007
- 장경렬, "‘아찔한 소용돌이,’ 그 안으로, In 응시와 성찰" (2008), 문학과 지성사
- 장재진, "액자소설의 담화구조 연구", 석사, pp.2001
- 조남현, "문제적 인물에 대한 끊임 없는 탐구", 문학사상, (142) (1984)
- 최애순, "이청준 소설의 추리소설적 구조 연구", 석사, pp.2000
- 한순미, "언어의 불투명성과 재현 불가능성: 『제 3의 현장』, In 가(假)의 언어 : 이청준 문학 연구" (2009), 푸른사상사