본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일제하 수리조합사업과 일본인 토목청부업자

Irrigation association business and Japanese engineering contractors in Japanese Colonial Days

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

There are two problems of advanced research regarding irrigation association business. Firstly, how Korean landowners of irrigation association business were collapsed, and how Japanese landowners increased landholding. And secondly, rice price was a downward trend for a long time since 1920 and why Japanese landowners tried to repel Korean landowners and conducted irrigation association business. A keyword for these two problems can be an existence of Japanese engineering contractors and furthermore, a back-scratching alliance with Japanese landowners. It can be thought that Japanese engineering contractors used irrigation association business in order to increase public works. People who will benefit the most from irrigation association business are Japanese contractor who took sub contracts, and they can only start the construction when an irrigation association is established after agreeing with landowner. It can be expected that instead of distributing benefits of public works to public works, Japanese contractors asked for a favor to Japanese landowner to make irrigation association. As one of the circumstantial evidences, there was an expense called preliminary expense on irrigation association business financial report. preliminary expense refers to an expense to persuade landowner when making irrigation association, and it is strange to persuade landowner with money rather than deciding irrigation association business objectively. It can be simply guessed that Japanese contractors who will benefit the most from sub-contracts of public works persuaded Japanese landowner to proceed irrigation association business by force. Also, for Bupyeong irrigation association which made some problems including fraudulent work, president of contractor, Haesa Hwang>Kokai-sha who received sub contract of public works with the head of irrigation association and Matsuyama Chunejilo were the same person. Considering this, purpose of irrigation association business which is an increase of agricultural production was secondary, and the real hidden purpose for Japanese contractor was to distribute the benefits with Japanese landowner by increasing profit through public works. Looking at this macroscopically, it can be said that the capital of Korean landowner was converted to the capital of Japanese contractor with Japanese landowner. Thus, it is thought that the reason that land holding of Japanese landowner was increased and Japanese landowner conducted irrigation association business was to seek benefits.

Abstract

There are two problems of advanced research regarding irrigation association business. Firstly, how Korean landowners of irrigation association business were collapsed, and how Japanese landowners increased landholding. And secondly, rice price was a downward trend for a long time since 1920 and why Japanese landowners tried to repel Korean landowners and conducted irrigation association business. A keyword for these two problems can be an existence of Japanese engineering contractors and furthermore, a back-scratching alliance with Japanese landowners. It can be thought that Japanese engineering contractors used irrigation association business in order to increase public works. People who will benefit the most from irrigation association business are Japanese contractor who took sub contracts, and they can only start the construction when an irrigation association is established after agreeing with landowner. It can be expected that instead of distributing benefits of public works to public works, Japanese contractors asked for a favor to Japanese landowner to make irrigation association. As one of the circumstantial evidences, there was an expense called preliminary expense on irrigation association business financial report. preliminary expense refers to an expense to persuade landowner when making irrigation association, and it is strange to persuade landowner with money rather than deciding irrigation association business objectively. It can be simply guessed that Japanese contractors who will benefit the most from sub-contracts of public works persuaded Japanese landowner to proceed irrigation association business by force. Also, for Bupyeong irrigation association which made some problems including fraudulent work, president of contractor, Haesa Hwang>Kokai-sha who received sub contract of public works with the head of irrigation association and Matsuyama Chunejilo were the same person. Considering this, purpose of irrigation association business which is an increase of agricultural production was secondary, and the real hidden purpose for Japanese contractor was to distribute the benefits with Japanese landowner by increasing profit through public works. Looking at this macroscopically, it can be said that the capital of Korean landowner was converted to the capital of Japanese contractor with Japanese landowner. Thus, it is thought that the reason that land holding of Japanese landowner was increased and Japanese landowner conducted irrigation association business was to seek benefits.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 이애숙, "일제하 수리조합사업의 전개와 지주제 강화", 석사, 국사학, pp.1984
  2. 田降秀, "일제하 수리조합 사업이 지주제 전개에 미친 영향 : 산업증식계획기(1920-34)를 중심으로", 석사, 경제학, pp.1984
  3. 松本武祝, "植民地期朝鮮の水利組合事業" (1991), 未来社
  4. 李榮薫, "근대 조선 水利組合의 연구" (1992), 일조각
  5. 박수현, "일제하 수리조합 항쟁 연구 : 1920~1934년 산미증식계획기를 중심으로", 박사, 한국사, pp.2002
  6. 김진수, "일제수리사Ⅰ", 한국관개배수, 15(1) (2008)
  7. 김진수, "일제수리사Ⅱ", 한국관개배수, 15(2) (2008)
  8. 김진수, "일제수리사Ⅲ", 한국관개배수, 16(1) (2009)
  9. 김진수, "일제수리사Ⅳ", 한국관개배수, 16(2) (2009)
  10. 정승진, "식민지지주제의 동향(1914~1945)-전북 「익산군춘포면토지대장」의 분석-", 한국경제연구, 12, pp.139~176 (2004), 한국경제연구학회
  11. 정승진, "일제시대 전익수리조합의 전개과정과 그 역사적 의의", 농촌경제, 31(6), pp.79~102 (2009), 한국농촌경제연구원
  12. 허수열, "일제시대의 개발은 ‘개발 없는 개발’", 월간 마루, pp.109~ (2005)
  13. 東畑精一, "増訂日本農業の展開過程", pp.89~97 (1936), 岩波書店
  14. 東畑精一, "朝鮮米穀経済論", pp.9~22 (1935), 岩波書店
  15. 허수열, "개발 없는 개발", pp.86~88 (2005), 은행나무
  16. 박수현, "1920·30년대 水利組合 設置反對運動 추세와 그 원인", 사학연구, (67), pp.171~198 (2002), 한국사학회
  17. 손경희, "서면水利組合 설립에 대한 반대운동", 계명사학, 16 (2005)
  18. 金性基, "創設過程에서 본 일제하 水利組合의 歴史的性格", 사회과학연구, 13(2) (1997)
  19. 玉城哲, "水利の社会構造", pp.33~ (1984), 国際連合大学
  20. 旗手勲, "水利の社会構造" (1984), 国際連合大学
  21. 井上則之, "朝鮮米と共に三十年 湯村辰二郎の記録", pp.53~70 (1956), 米友会
  22. TORIUMIYUTAKA, "일제하 조선인 노동자의 저임금과 일본인 토목청부업자의 부당 이익", 한일경상논집, 60, pp.55~75 (2013), 한일경상학회
  23. "京城日報 1930.8.15", ~ (1930)
  24. 朝鮮總督府農林局農村振興課, "農家經濟槪況調査 1933~1938年" (1940)
  25. 金谷要作, "朝鮮の産業金融について" (1980), 友邦協会
  26. 岡本真希子, "植民地官僚の政治史" (2008), 三元社
  27. "국사편찬위원회 한국사데이터베이스 한국근현대인물자료"[URL]
  28. "국사편찬위원회 한국사데이터베이스 한국근현대인물자료"[URL]
  29. "국사편찬위원회 한국사데이터베이스 한국근현대인물자료"[URL]
  30. "국사편찬위원회 한국사데이터베이스 한국근현대인물자료"[URL]
  31. "九度山町柿の里振興公社 松山常次郎記念館 松山常次郎氏とは"[URL]
  32. 朝鮮土地改良部, "朝鮮土地改良事業要覽", pp.134~140 (1930)
  33. 大陸研究社, "満鮮問題の帰趨", pp.190~ (1934)
  34. "全朝鮮水利組合實查", 東亞日報, ~ (1927)
  35. "代行數料一定問題", 東亞日報, ~ (1928)
  36. "評議會를 決議機關 水組의 自治도 決議", 東亞日報, ~ (1930)
  37. "水利組合檢討監督當局의 責任을 論함(四)", 東亞日報, ~ (1931)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)