규장각 소장본을 통해 본 조선 중·후기 『중용』 연구 경향
Research tendency about The Doctrine of the Mean in the middle and late periods of Joseon Dynasty seen through block books of it housed in Kyujanggak
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay examines kinds and formal composition system of block books of The Doctrine of the Mean housed in Kyujanggak and investigated research tendency about it in the middle and late periods of Joseon Dynasty. Especially, it establishes which characteristics have view of golden mean of several scholars in the middle and late periods of Joseon Dynasty according to two core study methodology of The Doctrine of the Mean of the metaphysical viewpoint of Neo-Confucianism and moral practice. If writer arrange characteristic of block books of The Doctrine of the Mean housed in Kyujanggak, it can be summed up several articles for this At first, There are striking differences between block books like Jungyongjanggu, Jungyongunhae, and Jungyongjanggudaejeon published in the country and handbook of The Mean built by the individual among block books of The Doctrine of the Mean of Kyujanggak. The second, If one watch the publication time, while Jungyongunhae, and Jungyongjanggudaejeon was published consistently since the mid Joseon Dynasty, Jungyongjanggu was pressed relatively in the late period since yeongzo era to sunzo one. To put it concretely, we can say that study of Jungyongjanggu and Jungyongjanggudaejeon published consistently in the country with great interest among block books of The Doctrine of the Mean of Kyujanggak has the directivity affirming metaphysical viewpoint of Neo-Confucianism. Whereas Jungyonggukyeongyeoneyi of Lee Eonjeok, Jungyongsabyeonlok of Park Sedang and Jungyongjajam of Jeong Yakyong show understanding method of Jungyong to emphasize moral practice For modern studies of The Mean, it is necessary to establish viewpoint through which one distinguishes between Junghwa[中和] as core term of theory of mind and nature and Jungyong[中庸] as concept for everyday moral practice. Going one step forward, it is also to formulate timely research methodology that one deduces life or ecological value as modern meaning involved in the golden Mean.
Abstract
This essay examines kinds and formal composition system of block books of The Doctrine of the Mean housed in Kyujanggak and investigated research tendency about it in the middle and late periods of Joseon Dynasty. Especially, it establishes which characteristics have view of golden mean of several scholars in the middle and late periods of Joseon Dynasty according to two core study methodology of The Doctrine of the Mean of the metaphysical viewpoint of Neo-Confucianism and moral practice. If writer arrange characteristic of block books of The Doctrine of the Mean housed in Kyujanggak, it can be summed up several articles for this At first, There are striking differences between block books like Jungyongjanggu, Jungyongunhae, and Jungyongjanggudaejeon published in the country and handbook of The Mean built by the individual among block books of The Doctrine of the Mean of Kyujanggak. The second, If one watch the publication time, while Jungyongunhae, and Jungyongjanggudaejeon was published consistently since the mid Joseon Dynasty, Jungyongjanggu was pressed relatively in the late period since yeongzo era to sunzo one. To put it concretely, we can say that study of Jungyongjanggu and Jungyongjanggudaejeon published consistently in the country with great interest among block books of The Doctrine of the Mean of Kyujanggak has the directivity affirming metaphysical viewpoint of Neo-Confucianism. Whereas Jungyonggukyeongyeoneyi of Lee Eonjeok, Jungyongsabyeonlok of Park Sedang and Jungyongjajam of Jeong Yakyong show understanding method of Jungyong to emphasize moral practice For modern studies of The Mean, it is necessary to establish viewpoint through which one distinguishes between Junghwa[中和] as core term of theory of mind and nature and Jungyong[中庸] as concept for everyday moral practice. Going one step forward, it is also to formulate timely research methodology that one deduces life or ecological value as modern meaning involved in the golden Mean.
참고문헌 (26)
- 안현주, "조선시대에 간행된「중용」의 제판본에 관한 연구", 서지학연구, (32), pp.179~204 (2005), 한국서지학회
- "중용", ~
- "중용장구", ~
- "중용장구대전", ~
- "中庸奎璧", ~
- "中庸大文", ~
- "庸學大文", ~
- "庸學正文", ~
- "四書三經正文", ~
- 서경요, "조선유학에서의 『중용』 해석학의 역할", 유교문화연구, 12, pp.33~ (2008)
- 안병걸, "『中庸章句』의 체계와 조선조 유학", 중국철학, 3, pp.407~408 (1992)
- (中庸)과 세종(世宗)의 정치: ‘구경(九經)’을 중심으로, "한국동양정치사상사연구", 2012, 55~75, pp.한국동양정치사상사학회
- 서세영, "퇴계 이황의 <중용> 해석", 동양고전연구, (54), pp.45~76 (2014), 동양고전학회
- 이세동, "龜巖 李楨의 中庸學", 퇴계학과 유교문화, (44), pp.265~300 (2009), 퇴계연구소
- 김범수, "하서 김인후의 인간관-도덕 실천주제로서의 인간이해", 철학연구, 92, pp.59~84 (2004), 대한철학회
- 최종호, "柳成龍의 經學觀과 經世思想의 特徵", 태동고전연구, 29, pp.27~55 (2012), 태동고전연구소
- 장병한, "浦渚 趙翼의 ?中庸私覽?에 대한 연구(1)- ‘中庸’과 ‘費隱’의 해석을 중심으로-", 漢文敎育硏究, 19, pp.333~356 (2002), 한국한문교육학회
- 김유곤, "『중용』과 『대학』 해석에 나타난 윤휴의 事天之學의 구조와 성격", 동양철학연구, (76), pp.7~36 (2013), 동양철학연구회[DOI]
- 신창호, "西溪 朴世堂의 <思辨錄 中庸> 理解와 學問的 特徵", 동양고전연구, (55), pp.59~84 (2014), 동양고전학회
- 엄연석, "조선전기 『중용』이해와 퇴계 『중용석의中庸釋義』의 해석 특징", 국학연구, (25), pp.277~316 (2014), 한국국학진흥원
- 엄연석, "조선전기역철학사", pp.65~ (2014), 학자원
- 이지경, "晦齋 李彦迪의 『中庸九經衍義』에 관한 연구: 군주론을 중심으로", 사회과학연구, 11, pp.236~238 (1998)
- 朴世堂, "思辨錄: 中庸", ~
- 安秉杰, "西溪 朴世堂의 中庸解釋과 朱子學批判", 泰東古典硏究, 10, pp.675~ (1993)
- 丁若鏞, "與猶堂全書 2", ~
- 엄연석, "『韓國經學資料集成』 所載 『中庸』 註釋의 특징과 그 연구방향", 대동문화연구, (49), pp.125~168 (2005), 대동문화연구원
