욕망의 계보학: 정욕과 성욕의 관리술을 중심으로
Genealogy of the Desire with Sex in Korean History
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Korean history studies, Discussion of sexuality has been argued on two hypothesis. It is first, historical concept hypothesis that the concept of sexuality as a general idea is been years for long time in korea, and second, repressive hypothesis that sexuality has been suppressed. But the concept of sexuality has been a general idea invented by modern intellect in Japan who studied western sexology more than just 100 years ago. Furthermore, the belief that most of us are accustomed to, Korean society is conservative with sexuality under the influence of Confucian idea, is not also been historically proven. In this context, this study approached sexuality matter in korean history with a alternative concept, desire(慾) and the self-cultivation. Before the 20th century in Korea, the pre-modern concept of sexual desire, 情慾, implied the measure of Confucian self-cultivation. Confucian scholars had to manage desire well to verify oneself as a Confucian subject. Therefore, Pre-modern type of sexual desire had to be manipulated rather than negated. Scholars was bothered about distribution of sexual desire in daily life and public. Because the balance of given plural role, for example, as good head of household, good administration, loyal retainer, and great monarch, was important to be whole Confucian subject. On the other hand, western sexology and sexual pathology imported from Japan established new type idea about sexual desire (性慾) and criteria for cultivation in 20th Korean society. Modern sexual desire was conjugated as one of index to measure boundary between normality and abnormality, thus citizens had to cultivate thoughtfully own sexual desire and follow scientific guidelines about sexual desire not to be abnormal. More importantly, the overriding issue was that sexual desire must be considered in relationship between subject and others. Pre-modern Confucian Scholars cultivated one’s own desire only to be subject by oneself and the main strategy of cultivation is to concentrate not to lose oneself. On the other hand, Modern citizens had to control owns and others’ at the same time not to stimulate others’ desire. People had to act thoughtfully of others’ in public places, especially school and Parent also make effort carefully not to be exposed their desire in front of family, specially their children. In order to look deep in to Korean history with sexuality, this research reviewed genealogy of sexual desire and the cultivation rather than history of sexuality and repression. Nevertheless, this study could not trace specifically the strategies of cultivation with sexual desire. It is significant references that tactics of self-body and strategies to spatialize sexual desire in private and public spaces such as home, school, office or theater and stations. It will be revealed through following study.
Abstract
In Korean history studies, Discussion of sexuality has been argued on two hypothesis. It is first, historical concept hypothesis that the concept of sexuality as a general idea is been years for long time in korea, and second, repressive hypothesis that sexuality has been suppressed. But the concept of sexuality has been a general idea invented by modern intellect in Japan who studied western sexology more than just 100 years ago. Furthermore, the belief that most of us are accustomed to, Korean society is conservative with sexuality under the influence of Confucian idea, is not also been historically proven. In this context, this study approached sexuality matter in korean history with a alternative concept, desire(慾) and the self-cultivation. Before the 20th century in Korea, the pre-modern concept of sexual desire, 情慾, implied the measure of Confucian self-cultivation. Confucian scholars had to manage desire well to verify oneself as a Confucian subject. Therefore, Pre-modern type of sexual desire had to be manipulated rather than negated. Scholars was bothered about distribution of sexual desire in daily life and public. Because the balance of given plural role, for example, as good head of household, good administration, loyal retainer, and great monarch, was important to be whole Confucian subject. On the other hand, western sexology and sexual pathology imported from Japan established new type idea about sexual desire (性慾) and criteria for cultivation in 20th Korean society. Modern sexual desire was conjugated as one of index to measure boundary between normality and abnormality, thus citizens had to cultivate thoughtfully own sexual desire and follow scientific guidelines about sexual desire not to be abnormal. More importantly, the overriding issue was that sexual desire must be considered in relationship between subject and others. Pre-modern Confucian Scholars cultivated one’s own desire only to be subject by oneself and the main strategy of cultivation is to concentrate not to lose oneself. On the other hand, Modern citizens had to control owns and others’ at the same time not to stimulate others’ desire. People had to act thoughtfully of others’ in public places, especially school and Parent also make effort carefully not to be exposed their desire in front of family, specially their children. In order to look deep in to Korean history with sexuality, this research reviewed genealogy of sexual desire and the cultivation rather than history of sexuality and repression. Nevertheless, this study could not trace specifically the strategies of cultivation with sexual desire. It is significant references that tactics of self-body and strategies to spatialize sexual desire in private and public spaces such as home, school, office or theater and stations. It will be revealed through following study.
참고문헌 (85)
- 미셸 푸코, "성의 역사 1ㆍ지식의 의지" (2012), 나남
- 김중순, "한국 한국인 한국문화" (2015), 일조각
- 류지한, "성윤리" (2002), 울력
- 전경옥, "한국여성정치사회사" (2004), 숙명여자대학교출판부
- 주디스 버틀러, "젠더 트러블", pp.89~90 (2008), 문학동네
- 정병설, "조선 후기 성(性)의 실상과 배경 -『기이재상담(紀伊齋常談)』을 중심으로", 인문논총, (64), pp.163~202 (2010), 인문학연구원[DOI]
- 이상곤, "‘정욕(情欲)’에 대한 기질성리학적 분석과 그 의의 - 성리학적 인간학 건립을 위한 시안", 철학연구, 59, pp.144~ (1997)
- 페르디난 드 소쉬르, "일반언어학 강의", pp.21~23 (2006), 민음사
- 미셸 푸코, "성의 역사 2ㆍ쾌락의 활용", pp.50~ (2011), 나남
- 赤川学, "セクシュアリティの歴史社会学", pp.98~107 (1999), 勁草書房
- Daniel Boyarin, "Foucault’s The History of Sexuality: The Fourth Volume, or, a Field Left Fallow for Others to Till", Journal of the History of Sexuality, 10 (2001)
- 하인리히 뵐플린, "미술사의 기초개념 : 근세미술에 있어서의 양식발전의 문제" (1994), 시공사
- 말리노프스키, "未開社會의 性과 抑壓" (1978), 三省出版社
- 차하순, "사상사란 무엇인가", 한국사상사학, (52), pp.1~38 (2016), 한국사상사학회
- 앙리 르페브르, "공간의 생산" (2011), 에코리브르
- 에드워드 소자, "공간과 비판사회이론" (1997), 시각과 언어
- 막스 베버, "프로테스탄트 윤리와 자본주의 정신" (2018), 현대지성
- 신판, "문명속의 불만", pp.2007, 지그문트 프로이트
- 지그문트 프로이트, "성욕에 관한 세 편의 에세이", pp.235~ (1997), 열린책들
- 빌헬름 라이히, "성혁명" (2000), 새길
- 슐라미스 파이어스톤, "性의 변증법", pp.55~69 (1983)
- 강명관, "조선시대의 성담론과 性", 한국한문학연구, (42), pp.9~43 (2008), 한국한문학회[DOI]
- 배홍철, "남녀칠세부동석의 수사학: 국내 신문 기사(1920‒2019)의 내용분석을 중심으로", 한국학, 43(4), pp.203~244 (2020), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
- 김미숙, "미군정기의 남녀공학정책 : 성별학교조직과 성통제 양식", 교육학연구, 39, pp.103~ (2001)
- 동아일보, "초등학교에서는 전학년에 걸쳐 남녀혼성의 학급편성을 해도 무방하다고 본다. 중학교 특히 사춘기인 고등학교에 있어서는 남녀별학을 원칙으로 하여 본능적인 충동을 교육적으로 피하는 것이 현명할 것이며...", ~ (1959)
- 이명수, "유가 철학의 욕망 경계와 근대적 분화" (2015), 다른생각
- 헨리 토드, "서울, 권력 도시 : 일본 식민 지배와 공공 공간의 생활 정치" (2020), 산처럼
- 이숙인, "정절의 역사", pp.23~ (2014), 푸른역사
- 김윤성, "조선후기 천주교 여성들의 금욕적 실천: 음식 절제와 성적 절제를 중심으로", 여성학논집, 24(1), pp.233~265 (2007), 한국여성연구원[DOI]
- 孫弘烈, "朝鮮時代 士大夫의 養生觀", 교육과학연구, 15, pp.4~ (2001)
- "正祖實錄", ~
- "七克", ~
- 安鼎福, "順菴集", ~
- 許筠, "惺所覆瓿稿", ~
- 金時習, "梅月堂文集", ~
- 李珥, "栗谷先生全書拾遺", ~
- 미셸 푸코, "성의 역사 4ㆍ육체의 고백" (2019), 나남
- 허태용, "성리학으로 조선시대를 설명하는 연구 경향의 비판적 고찰", 역사비평, (127), pp.317~350 (2019), 역사문제연구소[DOI]
- "肅宗實錄", ~
- 유길준, "서유견문", pp.295~ (2017), 아카넷
- 崔漢綺, "氣測體儀", ~
- 金昌協, "農巖集", ~
- 柳成龍, "西厓集", ~
- 김호, "《동의보감》 편찬의 역사적 배경과 의학론", 박사, 국사학, pp.2000
- 李珥, "栗谷全書", ~
- 金麟厚, "河西全集", ~
- 許浚, "東醫寶鑑", ~
- 동의과학연구소, "東醫寶鑑 「內景篇」 精爲至寶", 223~ (2002)
- 이진수, "한국 양생사상 연구", pp.79~132 (1999), 한양대학교 출판부
- 斎藤光, "「性欲」記号ㆍ概念の誕生に関する新たな知見", 京都精華大学紀要, 36 (2010)
- 森鷗外, "鷗外全集 第23卷" (1973), 岩波書店
- 新井正人, "“Vita sexualis"という言説装置 : 森鴎外におけるクラフト=エビング受容", 日本近代文学, 87 (2012)
- 모리 오가이, "기러기 외", pp.204~ (2017)
- S. Frühstück, "Colonizing sex", pp.59~ (2003), University of California Press
- "매일신보 1914.11.29", ~ (1914)
- 이정민, "프로이트 저작의 초기 한국어 번역 연구 －백상창의 『성욕론』과 이용호의 『선집』을 중심으로－", 인문과학, (65), pp.219~248 (2017), 인문학연구원[DOI]
- "性心理及性敎育小考", 女性 (1938)
- "未婚한 處女에게-性,戀愛, 結婚에 關하야", 新女性 (1925)
- 윤해동, "근대를 다시 읽는다" (2006), 역사비평사
- 배홍철, "한국 1920년대, 나체화를 둘러싼 예술과 외설의 사회적 의미", 한국학, 36(4), pp.202~230 (2013), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
- 조선일보, "展覽會구경군에 裸體畵팔다가 경찰서구경", ~ (1926)
- 동아일보, "性學大家澤田順次郎先生著 『男女性慾及性交』. 성에 번뇌하는 청춘남녀여. 성욕은 인류의 본능으로 (…)", ~ (1925)
- "性에 관한 問題의 討論(其一), 性知識ㆍ性敎育ㆍ男女交際", 東光 (1931)
- "今日의 女性과 現代의 敎育", 신여성 (1926)
- 田代美江子, "近代日本における性教育論の諸相とその特徴 : 1910~30年代における翻訳性教育論を中心に", 日本の教育史学, 52, pp.18~ (2009)
- "學校와 家庭의 時急問題 性敎育 實施 方策", 別乾坤 (1929)
- "동아일보 1931.10.9", ~ (1931)
- "조선일보 1928.10.23", ~ (1928)
- "동아일보 1928.1.24", ~ (1928)
- "동아일보 1931.4.9", ~ (1931)
- 미셸 푸코, "사회를 보호해야한다 : 콜레주드프랑스 강의 1975~76년", pp.301~ (2015), 난장
- 박차민정, "1920~30년대 ‘성과학’ 담론과 ‘이성애 규범성’의 탄생", 역사와 문화, (22), pp.29~52 (2011), 문화사학회
- "동아일보 1936.3.6", ~ (1936)
- "女性 1938.2월호", ~ (1938)
- "조선팔도혼인식순례-전라도", 女性 (1937)
- 김준형, "조선 후기 성 소화 선집" (2010), 문학동네
- 崔漢綺, "神氣通", ~
- "大典通編", ~
- 鄭道傳, "朝鮮經國典", ~
- 武田誠, "わいせつ規制の限界", pp.1~ (1995), 成文堂
- 中山研一, "わいせつ罪の可罰性 刑法175条をめぐる問題 (刑事法研究)", pp.9~ (1997), 成文堂
- "2016년 성폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법 제13조 위헌소원 中"[URL]
- 李濟馬, "格致藁 권1", ~
- 동아일보, "연애운반열차", ~ (1937)
- 미셸 푸코, "성의 역사 3ㆍ자기 배려", pp.123~ (2014), 나남