본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

18세기 총부의 입후권: 숙명공주의 봉사손 선정 문제를 중심으로

Chongbu’s Adoption Rights in 18th Century Joseon: Focusing on the Issue of Designating a Ritual Heir for Princess Sukmyeong

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

In Joseon dynasty, the wife of an eldest son who died without male issue was called chongbu, the eldest daughter-in-law. She had two important prerogatives: she succeeded to the line’s ritual heirship, and she had the right to designate an heir to her late husband. The majority of prior research on chongbu’s rights have focused on the mid Joseon period, while little attention has been paid to the late period of Joseon. In fact, it is largely believed that as the patrilineal principle became firmly entrenched in the late Joseon period, chongbu’s position and rights started to diminish and nearly disappear. However, the situation in late Joseon period, considering chongbu’s position, was not as simple as it has been argued. This study aims to examine the involvement of chongbu and her roles in the adoption process in the 18th century Joseon, focusing on a series of conflicts over designating a ritual heir for Princess Sukmeong, the daughter of King Hyojong. It was Mrs. Yi, Sim Jeong-bo’s widow and the eldest daughter-in-law of the princess who initiated this dispute. In 1727, Mrs. Yi petitioned the king asking for special permission to adopt Sim Tae- hyeon, a 25th-degree agnatic nephew as her second adopted son without discussing the issue with his biological family. Both the procedure and the content of her request were in violation of the adoption principle, and therefore she was confronted with strong opposition from the ministers as well as Tae-hyeon’s family. Mrs. Yi’s obsession with adopting another son even when her daughter-in-law was alive at the time and choosing an heir from a distant relative was largely driven by her desperation to maintain the customary privilege of a chongbu to lay claim on inherited ancestral property and benefit from a politically and socially prosperous family through her adopted son. Another notable conflict included Mrs. Yi and her own husband’s lineage who seemed to have disagreed on her decision. The conflict between chongbu and her husband’s lineage over family succession in late Joseon period was not unusual when considering another case in which Mrs. Song, the chongbu of Jeong Mong-ju lineage was involved in mid 18th century. Mrs. Song attempted to adopt a 30th-degree distant agnatic nephew against the decision of the Jeong lineage group and the will of its biological family for similar reasons that attracted Mrs. Yi. In both cases, chongbu’s adoption rights and their influences in the matter were largely recognized by the court. Contrary to a conventional wisdom that viewed various lineage affairs, including adoption, solely an arena of male descent group members in late Joseon society, this study shows how deeply chongbu were involved in the process of family succession based on the descent-line system to maintain their position and status in the midst of the strengthening of patrilineal order in the late Joseon society.

Abstract

In Joseon dynasty, the wife of an eldest son who died without male issue was called chongbu, the eldest daughter-in-law. She had two important prerogatives: she succeeded to the line’s ritual heirship, and she had the right to designate an heir to her late husband. The majority of prior research on chongbu’s rights have focused on the mid Joseon period, while little attention has been paid to the late period of Joseon. In fact, it is largely believed that as the patrilineal principle became firmly entrenched in the late Joseon period, chongbu’s position and rights started to diminish and nearly disappear. However, the situation in late Joseon period, considering chongbu’s position, was not as simple as it has been argued. This study aims to examine the involvement of chongbu and her roles in the adoption process in the 18th century Joseon, focusing on a series of conflicts over designating a ritual heir for Princess Sukmeong, the daughter of King Hyojong. It was Mrs. Yi, Sim Jeong-bo’s widow and the eldest daughter-in-law of the princess who initiated this dispute. In 1727, Mrs. Yi petitioned the king asking for special permission to adopt Sim Tae- hyeon, a 25th-degree agnatic nephew as her second adopted son without discussing the issue with his biological family. Both the procedure and the content of her request were in violation of the adoption principle, and therefore she was confronted with strong opposition from the ministers as well as Tae-hyeon’s family. Mrs. Yi’s obsession with adopting another son even when her daughter-in-law was alive at the time and choosing an heir from a distant relative was largely driven by her desperation to maintain the customary privilege of a chongbu to lay claim on inherited ancestral property and benefit from a politically and socially prosperous family through her adopted son. Another notable conflict included Mrs. Yi and her own husband’s lineage who seemed to have disagreed on her decision. The conflict between chongbu and her husband’s lineage over family succession in late Joseon period was not unusual when considering another case in which Mrs. Song, the chongbu of Jeong Mong-ju lineage was involved in mid 18th century. Mrs. Song attempted to adopt a 30th-degree distant agnatic nephew against the decision of the Jeong lineage group and the will of its biological family for similar reasons that attracted Mrs. Yi. In both cases, chongbu’s adoption rights and their influences in the matter were largely recognized by the court. Contrary to a conventional wisdom that viewed various lineage affairs, including adoption, solely an arena of male descent group members in late Joseon society, this study shows how deeply chongbu were involved in the process of family succession based on the descent-line system to maintain their position and status in the midst of the strengthening of patrilineal order in the late Joseon society.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 주희, "주자가례: 유교 공동체를 향한 주희의 설계" (1999), 예문서원
  2. 카이윙 초우, "예교주의: 17-18세기 중국 지식인의 윤리, 학문, 종족의 담론" (2013), 모노그래프
  3. 이승연, "종법宗法과 공사론公私論 ―주자의 종법 사상을 중심으로", 사회사상과 문화, 7, pp.153~184 (2003), 동양사회사상학회
  4. 김윤정, "霞谷 鄭齊斗의 宗法시행과 禮論", 인천학연구, 9 (2008)
  5. 김진우, "立後를 통해 본 朝鮮後期庶孼의 宗法的지위", 석사, pp.2018
  6. 한기범, "17世紀 女性의 宗法的 地位", 충남사학, 9, pp.38~ (1997)
  7. 이순구, "朝鮮中期 冢婦權과 立後의 강화", 고문서연구, 10 (1996)
  8. 김윤정, "朝鮮中期 祭祀承繼와 兄亡弟及의 변화", 조선시대사학보, (20), pp.107~130 (2002), 조선시대사학회
  9. 박경, "16세기 유교적 친족질서 정착 과정에서의 冢婦權 논의", 조선시대사학보, (59), pp.71~104 (2011), 조선시대사학회
  10. Mark Peterson, "Adoption in Korean Genealogies: Continuation of Lineage", Korea Journal, 14(1), pp.32~ (1974)
  11. 최재석, "한국가족제도연구", pp.610~ (1983), 일지사
  12. 정긍식, "朝鮮時代의 家系繼承法制", 서울대학교 법학, 51(2), pp.69~101 (2010), 법학연구소
  13. Jenny Dennerline, "Kinship Organization in Late Imperial China 1000-1940" (1986), University of California Press
  14. 정지영, "질서의 구축과 균열: 조선후기 호적과 여성들", pp.52~ (2015), 서강대학교 출판부
  15. 박경, "조선 전기의 입양과 가족제도", pp.144~145 (2011), 혜안
  16. "세종실록", ~
  17. "경국대전", ~
  18. "승정원일기", ~
  19. "명종실록", ~
  20. 마르티나 도이힐러, "한국 사회의 유교적 변환", pp.221~ (2003), 아카넷
  21. "중종실록", ~
  22. "효종실록", ~
  23. 고민정, "조선후기 연좌제 운영을 통해 본 罷繼의 양상과 가계계승", 사학연구, (124), pp.53~86 (2016), 한국사학회
  24. "다산시문집", ~
  25. "謙齋集", ~
  26. 조은, "가부장적 질서화와 부인권의 약화-조선전기 재산상속 분쟁 사례를 중심으로", 한국여성학, 16 (2000)
  27. "대전후속록", ~
  28. "경국대전주해", ~
  29. "속대전", ~
  30. 권내현, "조선후기 입양의 시점과 범위에 대한 분석", 대동문화연구, (62), pp.45~73 (2008), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
  31. Jisoo M. Kim, "The Emotions of Justice: Gender, Status, and Legal Performance in Chosǒn Korea", pp.76~77 (2015), University of Washington Press
  32. 김학수, "18세기 圃隱家門 繼後의 정치사회적 의미", 포은학연구, 10, pp.221~244 (2012), 포은학회[DOI]
  33. 정만조, "朝鮮時代 龍仁地域 士族의 動向", 한국학논총, 19, pp.98~99 (1996)
  34. 허원영, "한말 한 종가의 입후(立後)를 둘러싸고 발생한 사건들― 東萊鄭氏 鄭蘭宗 종가의 고문서 자료를 통한 재구성", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (75), pp.151~186 (2007), 한국사회사학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)