세종의 악보 제작과 그 의미: 기보를 통한 예악 보편주의의의 실현과 조선 敎化의 규범화
Publication of the Musical Scores in King Sejong’s Annals and its Meaning: Achievement of Ye-Ak禮樂 Universalism in Asia on 15th Century and Normative Legalization of Joseon Gyowha敎化 with the Musical Notation
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to the preface of the score in King Sejong Annals, he devoted himself to achieve Ye-Ak in order to realize the Do(道) of a saint. Do could be said to the way to reach to the Confucian ideal country. So King Sejong he published the scores to show how he carried out the task. In this paper, I tried to describe why King Sejong publishing the scores for comparing the notation system of the Sejong's with China's and even creating the unprecedented notation system, Jeongganbo. Analyzing Sejong's music score, I tried to find out what is the meaning of Joseon's Ye-Ak in the East Asia at 15th century. The first two scores of the Sejong’s Annals contains the Go-ak(asian ancient classical music 古樂) called Aak, and the rest nine volumes comtemporary Josoen music of the King Sejong’s reign called Sin-ak新樂 or Sok-ak俗樂. In this paper, to describe what Sejong wanted to do through scores, I saw the differences between the recording method and the purpose of notation. King Sejong was the first monarch to control and institutionalize the entire process of realizing Ye-Ak. He could be able to proclaim that Joseon was a civilized country. Then it could not be avoided to reveal the hierarchical structure between Joseon and China through Ye-Ak in the 15th century East Asian world. Sejong also had to accept the asymmetrical relationship in the process of practicing Ye-Ak. However, the system was overthrown in producing musical scores. King Sejong reinterpreted the music originating from China as universal music of civilized nation by rewriting in Joseon style with Aakbo(雅악譜) and created new system called Jeongganbo(井間譜), which is not available in China, to record Joseon music overwhelmingly. The score expresses a specific meaning in the process of creating an arbitrary sign and operating it systematically. Therefore, it can be said that Sejong showed a resistance or alternative to the contradictory hierarchy inherent in the Ye-Ak system from China. Because Jeongganbo was not only suitable for recording Joseon music with complicated rhythm but was invented as the most sophisticated music recording system at the time. However, King Sejong tried to actively utilize the differential order system inherent in the theory of Yeak in domestically. The music Sejong actively wanted to record in Jeongganbo was those that justified the royal family’s achievements and legitimacy regarding the foundation and reign. As Jeongganbo could be possible to record large-scale orchestras, it could show the authority of the royal family and monarchs. Therefore, it can be said that Jeongganbo was made so that this relationship could be institutionalized by recording the differences. Jeongganbo expresses exact pitch, duration, phrasing, writing lyrics etc. In this way, it can be said that Jeongganbo was created to show and teach(敎化) the differential order in Ye-Ak system. In this respect, it is understood that Sejong’s Jeongganbo lies in the center of the Ye-Ak that Sejong dreamed of, not in the marginalized line.
Abstract
According to the preface of the score in King Sejong Annals, he devoted himself to achieve Ye-Ak in order to realize the Do(道) of a saint. Do could be said to the way to reach to the Confucian ideal country. So King Sejong he published the scores to show how he carried out the task. In this paper, I tried to describe why King Sejong publishing the scores for comparing the notation system of the Sejong's with China's and even creating the unprecedented notation system, Jeongganbo. Analyzing Sejong's music score, I tried to find out what is the meaning of Joseon's Ye-Ak in the East Asia at 15th century. The first two scores of the Sejong’s Annals contains the Go-ak(asian ancient classical music 古樂) called Aak, and the rest nine volumes comtemporary Josoen music of the King Sejong’s reign called Sin-ak新樂 or Sok-ak俗樂. In this paper, to describe what Sejong wanted to do through scores, I saw the differences between the recording method and the purpose of notation. King Sejong was the first monarch to control and institutionalize the entire process of realizing Ye-Ak. He could be able to proclaim that Joseon was a civilized country. Then it could not be avoided to reveal the hierarchical structure between Joseon and China through Ye-Ak in the 15th century East Asian world. Sejong also had to accept the asymmetrical relationship in the process of practicing Ye-Ak. However, the system was overthrown in producing musical scores. King Sejong reinterpreted the music originating from China as universal music of civilized nation by rewriting in Joseon style with Aakbo(雅악譜) and created new system called Jeongganbo(井間譜), which is not available in China, to record Joseon music overwhelmingly. The score expresses a specific meaning in the process of creating an arbitrary sign and operating it systematically. Therefore, it can be said that Sejong showed a resistance or alternative to the contradictory hierarchy inherent in the Ye-Ak system from China. Because Jeongganbo was not only suitable for recording Joseon music with complicated rhythm but was invented as the most sophisticated music recording system at the time. However, King Sejong tried to actively utilize the differential order system inherent in the theory of Yeak in domestically. The music Sejong actively wanted to record in Jeongganbo was those that justified the royal family’s achievements and legitimacy regarding the foundation and reign. As Jeongganbo could be possible to record large-scale orchestras, it could show the authority of the royal family and monarchs. Therefore, it can be said that Jeongganbo was made so that this relationship could be institutionalized by recording the differences. Jeongganbo expresses exact pitch, duration, phrasing, writing lyrics etc. In this way, it can be said that Jeongganbo was created to show and teach(敎化) the differential order in Ye-Ak system. In this respect, it is understood that Sejong’s Jeongganbo lies in the center of the Ye-Ak that Sejong dreamed of, not in the marginalized line.
참고문헌 (46)
- 赵维平, "中国与东亚音乐的历史研究" (2012), 上海音乐学院出版社
- "고려사", ~
- 이혜구, "중국 예악사상이 한국음악에 미친 영향", 동서문화, 2, pp.101~ (1968)
- "태종실록", ~
- 이혜구, "세종장헌대왕실록 22" (1981), 세종대왕 기념사업회
- 장사훈, "세종조 음악연구: 세종대왕의 음악정신" (1982), 서울대학교 출판부
- Provine, Robert C., "Essays on Sino-Korean Musicology" (1988), Iljisa
- 송혜진, "한국아악사 연구" (2000), 민속원
- 정화순, "조선 세종대 조회아악 연구" (2006), 민속원
- 송혜진, "세종의 음악 정치 목적과 방법 고찰", 동양예술, (20), pp.187~220 (2012), 한국동양예술학회
- 송혜진, "조선 궁중음악의 유교적 특징", 유교문화연구소 춘계학술회의 자료집 (2015)
- 송혜진, "세종의 서재" (2016), 서해문집
- 이혜구, "한국음악연구" (1957), 국민음악연구회
- "세종실록", ~
- "風雅十二詩譜和瑟譜"[URL]
- 臧艺兵, "探索与思考-记谱法的变更对中国音乐传承传播的影响", 中國音乐, 2000(3), pp.26~ (2000)
- "孔子家語 간행 시 『符 新刊素王事紀 聖朝通制』 「孔子 廟祀」항", ~
- "闕里文獻備考 권24, 樂六之二", ~
- "禮記", ~
- "荀子 儒效", ~
- 杨荫浏, "中国古代音乐史稿(上冊)" (1981), 人民音乐出版社
- "論語", ~
- 劉東升, "그림으로 보는 중국음악사", pp.15~17 (2010), 민속원
- "『左傳』 昭公 20년 天子之樂曰雅", ~
- 王秀臣, "夏,商文化与“雅乐”制度的滥觞", 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007(22)통권 : 226 (2007)
- 孙世洋, "论周代雅乐理念的人文政治关怀", 长春师范学院学报(人文社会科学版), 25(3), pp.53~55 (2006)
- 邱源媛, "唐宋雅乐的对比研究", 硕士, pp.2003
- 문숙희, "율려신서(律呂新書): 음악을 통한 세종의 국가경영", 세종학학술회의 자료집, pp.47~68 (2014)
- 박종배, "조선시대 문묘 향사 위차의 특징과 그 교육적 시사 -명 · 청 시기 중국과의 비교를 중심으로-", 한국교육사학, 34(3), pp.1~21 (2012), 한국교육사학회[DOI]
- 김세종, "元代의 法典과 韓國 音樂", 한국사상과 문화, (44), pp.427~443 (2008), 한국사상문화학회
- 杨荫浏, "中国古代音乐史稿(下冊)", pp.1005~1016 (1981), 人民音乐出版社
- 刘桂腾, "清代乾隆朝宫廷礼乐探微", 中国音乐学, 2001(3), pp.43~67 (2001)
- 이혜구, "한국사", pp.50~59, 국사편찬위원회
- "명종실록", ~
- 김종수, "「樂學軌範」 악기분류의 음악사학적 고찰", 동방학, (16), pp.375~397 (2009), 동양고전연구소
- 이혜구, "정간보의 정간 대강 및 장단" (1987), 세광음악출판사
- "용비어천가 4장", ~
- 藍玉崧, "韶", ~
- 彭松, "中國大百科全書(音樂・舞蹈)", pp.573~574 (1989), 中國大百科全書出版社
- 漆明镜, "《魏氏乐谱》 若干问题之我见", 文化艺术研究, 2009(2), pp.85~101 (2009)
- "세조실록 권48, 樂譜", ~
- "周禮 春官", ~
- 王美华, "礼乐制度与十国政治", 东北师大学报, (5) (2001)
- 沈知白, "中国音乐史纲要", pp.17~20 (1982), 文艺出版社
- "孟子 梁惠王下", ~
- 송혜진, "세종대 동아시아 예악론의 인식 양상과 의례음악 정비", 한국학연구, (51), pp.111~142 (2014), 한국학연구소[DOI]
