한반도를 매개로 대륙과 일본을 연결시키기 -임나일본부, 낙랑군에 대한 이나바 이와키치[稻葉岩吉]의 논의를 중심으로-
Connecting the Continent and Japan through the Korean Peninsula - Focus on Inaba Iwakichi(稻葉岩吉)’s Research about Japanese Ministry of Imna(任那日本府) and Lelang Commandery(樂浪郡) -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
From the end of the 19th century to 1945, Japanese historians' research on Korean history is known for justifying aggression and colonial rule. In particular, the fact that Japan conquered and ruled the southern part of the Korean Peninsula in ancient time was one of its main subjects. However, the research on Japanese rule of southern part of Korean peninsular in ancient time was not just to rationalize the colonial rule through the past. First of all, it also meant that political unification of the Japanese Archipelago took place early. This is because it is difficult to secure sovereignty by attacking the southern part of the peninsula over the sea without political unification, stability and prosperity. Not only that, but it was also about the very old relationship between Japan and the continent represented by China. The reason why Japan, the tip island in Northeast Asia, was able to develop and prosper so quickly in ancient times was because it accepted advanced Chinese culture and culture from China's counties on the Korean Peninsula. In other words, the advanced cultures Japan accepted in its relationship with China before and after A.D. became a driving force for Japan's political and cultural development in ancient time, and as a result, Japan grew to dominate Korea beyond the sea. From this perspective, it can be said that Japanese rule of southern part of Korean peninsular in ancient time was not only about Japan's superiority in Korea-Japan relations, but also about Japan's political development and relationship between China and Japan at that time. This paper examines what kind of historical images Inaba Iwakichi drew on the Japanese Ministry of Imna and China's counties such as Lelang Commandery. Inaba, who led the study of Korean history during the colonial period, also thought the Japanese rule of southern part of Korean peninsular and China-Japan relations in connection like other Japanese researchers such as Imanishi Ryu and Tsuda Sokichi. However, based on "The King of Na gold seal"(漢委奴国王印) which were discovered on an island in northern Kyushu in 1784 and Chinese history books such as Book of Han(漢書), Book of Wei(魏書), he set the date of establishment of the Japanese Ministry in Korean peninsular more than 100 years earlier than other researchers. In addition, Inaba emphasized that Lelang Commandery's culture was not a frontier but the essence of contemporary Chinese culture through the bronze bell of Emperor Wen's shrine(孝文廟銅鐘) and Lacquerwares with inscriptions of Lelang(樂浪漆器) that were excavated in the Daedong River basin in the mid-1920s. He went further from here and insisted that it was in the distant past before the establishment of Four Commanderies of Han that Chinese forces entered the Korean peninsular based on the founding of the sphere made in Qin Dynasty(秦戈) and Knife money(明刀). In particular, Inaba argued that Chinese culture was introduced to Japan before the establishment of Four Commanderies of Han through the discovery of the Knife money in the direction of Yamato(大和) through Setonaikai(瀬戸内海) beyond the Korean Peninsula, and that to understand Japanese history, changes in the continent must be considered from the beginning. In addition, he went further here, suggesting that the Indian and the Western Regions' cultures of the continent affect the Lelang culture through the Hill censer(博山 爐) and the plating technology of the Lelang lacquerwares. In other words, Inaba tried to show that Japan accepted the devepolped Chinese Culture, which was the driving force for Japan's political and cultural development, before the establishment of the Four Commanderies of Han through Korean peninsular ane the Chinese Culture was not only the essence of mainland China, but also influenced by the Western Regions cultures. In this regard, it can be said that Inaba not only raised the beginning point of ancient Japanese development and the period of Japanese rule of southern part of Korean peninsular, but also tried to reveal that Japan's history and culture were related to China as well as the continent beyond him since its inception.
Abstract
From the end of the 19th century to 1945, Japanese historians' research on Korean history is known for justifying aggression and colonial rule. In particular, the fact that Japan conquered and ruled the southern part of the Korean Peninsula in ancient time was one of its main subjects. However, the research on Japanese rule of southern part of Korean peninsular in ancient time was not just to rationalize the colonial rule through the past. First of all, it also meant that political unification of the Japanese Archipelago took place early. This is because it is difficult to secure sovereignty by attacking the southern part of the peninsula over the sea without political unification, stability and prosperity. Not only that, but it was also about the very old relationship between Japan and the continent represented by China. The reason why Japan, the tip island in Northeast Asia, was able to develop and prosper so quickly in ancient times was because it accepted advanced Chinese culture and culture from China's counties on the Korean Peninsula. In other words, the advanced cultures Japan accepted in its relationship with China before and after A.D. became a driving force for Japan's political and cultural development in ancient time, and as a result, Japan grew to dominate Korea beyond the sea. From this perspective, it can be said that Japanese rule of southern part of Korean peninsular in ancient time was not only about Japan's superiority in Korea-Japan relations, but also about Japan's political development and relationship between China and Japan at that time. This paper examines what kind of historical images Inaba Iwakichi drew on the Japanese Ministry of Imna and China's counties such as Lelang Commandery. Inaba, who led the study of Korean history during the colonial period, also thought the Japanese rule of southern part of Korean peninsular and China-Japan relations in connection like other Japanese researchers such as Imanishi Ryu and Tsuda Sokichi. However, based on "The King of Na gold seal"(漢委奴国王印) which were discovered on an island in northern Kyushu in 1784 and Chinese history books such as Book of Han(漢書), Book of Wei(魏書), he set the date of establishment of the Japanese Ministry in Korean peninsular more than 100 years earlier than other researchers. In addition, Inaba emphasized that Lelang Commandery's culture was not a frontier but the essence of contemporary Chinese culture through the bronze bell of Emperor Wen's shrine(孝文廟銅鐘) and Lacquerwares with inscriptions of Lelang(樂浪漆器) that were excavated in the Daedong River basin in the mid-1920s. He went further from here and insisted that it was in the distant past before the establishment of Four Commanderies of Han that Chinese forces entered the Korean peninsular based on the founding of the sphere made in Qin Dynasty(秦戈) and Knife money(明刀). In particular, Inaba argued that Chinese culture was introduced to Japan before the establishment of Four Commanderies of Han through the discovery of the Knife money in the direction of Yamato(大和) through Setonaikai(瀬戸内海) beyond the Korean Peninsula, and that to understand Japanese history, changes in the continent must be considered from the beginning. In addition, he went further here, suggesting that the Indian and the Western Regions' cultures of the continent affect the Lelang culture through the Hill censer(博山 爐) and the plating technology of the Lelang lacquerwares. In other words, Inaba tried to show that Japan accepted the devepolped Chinese Culture, which was the driving force for Japan's political and cultural development, before the establishment of the Four Commanderies of Han through Korean peninsular ane the Chinese Culture was not only the essence of mainland China, but also influenced by the Western Regions cultures. In this regard, it can be said that Inaba not only raised the beginning point of ancient Japanese development and the period of Japanese rule of southern part of Korean peninsular, but also tried to reveal that Japan's history and culture were related to China as well as the continent beyond him since its inception.
참고문헌 (35)
- 이기용, "일본침략사상의 원형인 ‘神功皇后說話’", 일본사상, 13 (2007)
- 연민수, "錦繪에 투영된 神功皇后傳說과 韓國史像", 한국고대사연구, 69 (2013)
- 신동규, "조선총독부의 ‘시정기념 사진그림엽서’로 본 식민지 지배의 선전과 왜곡", 일본문화연구, 67 (2018)
- 이만열, "한일역사공동연구보고서", pp.4~39 (2005)
- 정상우, "1910~1915년 조선총독부 촉탁의 학술조사사업", 역사와 현실, 68, pp.256~257 (2008)
- 김형구, "임나일본부설은 허구인가", pp.23~25 (2010), 창비
- 정상우, "식민주의 역사학 속의 일본과 중국", 한국학연구, 62 (2021)
- 김성현, "쓰다 소키치는 고대 일본의 한반도 정벌을 통해 어떠한 歷史像을 그려냈는가", 사학연구, 145 (2022)
- 장신, "근대 일본의 조선사 연구 : 통계적 접근", 奎章閣, 61, pp.419~421 (2023)
- 정상우, "『朝鮮史』(朝鮮史編修회 간행) 편찬 사업 전후 일본인 연구자들의 갈등 양상과 새로운 연구자의 등장", 사학연구, 116, pp.150~173 (2014)
- 심희찬, "근대 역사학과 식민주의 역사학의 거리", 韓國史學史學報, 28 (2013)
- 정상우, "『朝鮮史』(조선사편수회 간행) 편찬과 만선사의 상관성", 만주연구, 24, pp.57~67 (2017)
- 稻葉岩吉, "神功紀外征の新考察", 歷史敎育 (1933)
- 정상우, "만선사, 그 형성과 지속", pp.32~33 (2022), 사회평론아카데미
- 稻葉君山, "漢委奴國王印考", 考古學雜誌, pp.1~12 (1911)
- 內藤湖南, "倭面土國", 藝文, pp.2~6 (1911)
- 稻葉岩吉, "滿洲發達史", pp.473~475 (1915), 大阪屋號出版部
- 吉田東伍, "日韓古史斷" (1893), 富山房
- 那珂通世, "那珂通世遺書", pp.263~266 (1915), 故那珂博士功績紀念會
- 工藤雅樹, "東北考古學·古代史學史", pp.368~ (1998)
- 나가하라 게이지, "20세기 일본의 역사학", pp.40~41 (2011), 삼천리
- 吉田東伍, "倒敍日本史第十冊-神代及上古記", pp.118~121 (1913), 早稻田大學出版部
- 稻葉岩吉, "朝鮮史講座- 朝鮮民族史" (1925)
- 稻葉君山, "朝鮮文化史硏究" (1925), 雄山閣
- 稻葉君山, "朝鮮文化史硏究" (1925), 雄山閣
- 稻葉岩吉, "漢四郡問題の攷察", 朝鮮, 154, pp.21~32 (1928), 朝鮮總督府
- 稻葉君山, "朝鮮文化史硏究", pp.310~319 (1925), 雄山閣
- 稻葉君山, "朝鮮文化史硏究" (1925), 雄山閣
- 오영찬, "‘낙랑칠기’ 연구와 식민지주의", 百濟文化, 49, pp.98~100 (2013)
- 吳永贊, "國立中央博物館所藏樂浪古墳資料와 硏究現況", 한국고대사연구, 34, pp.57~ (2004)
- 오영찬, "근대 역사학과 낙랑군", 제44회 원사시대 사회문화 변동의 본질-한국상고사 재정립을 위한 동북아와 유럽의 역사학 및 고고학의 학제적 연구, pp.81~ (2016)
- 정인성, "일제강점기의 낙랑고고학", 韓國上古史學報, 71, pp.160~ (2011)
- 稻葉君山, "朝鮮文化史硏究", pp.193~194 (1925), 雄山閣
- 稻葉君山, "支那文化より見たる樂浪遺品", 朝鮮, 139 (1926)
- 稻葉岩吉, "支那香料の硏究", 東亞經濟硏究, 10(4), pp.36~43 (1926)
