신자료 <산군전>에 나타난 산군의 형상과 시대적 우의
A Study on Characters of Mountain Lord and Periodical Allegorical Meaning in the New Materials of The Biography of Mountain Lord
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aimed to characters of mountain lord and periodical allegorical meaning in the new materials of the biography of mountain lord by Dongmyeong Hwang joong-yoon. In the biography of mountain lord Sangun is the posthumous name and its original name is Ban piao. Ban piao’s ancestors were warriors from the Chu state, and Ban piao became king using his power. After his coronation, he was portrayed as a tyrant who used excessive force. In the biography of mountain lord, Ban piao was identified with the emperor of Qin dynasty and was finally evaluated as a fate to be defeated. The author uses historical figures for characterization. First, the main character was given the name of Ban piao, a positive historical character. Ban piao’s two sons, Bangu and Ban cho, are representative of the pen and the sword, respectively, and Ban piao is a person who supported the Emperor Guangwu of Han who ruled the country with the pen and the sword. In this way, the author used various knowledge and information related to Ban piao to express the utility of the sword. Next, Ban Piao’s life is similar to Xiang ji. The writer sees Xiang Ji as a villainous hero in an age of confusion. his confirms to some extent the use of force by Ban Piao before the accession to the throne. However, after his accession to the throne, the abuse of force by Ban piao ended in his own death. This is a negative perception of force. In other words, it is the power to rule in a chaotic age, and the pen to rule in a peaceful age. This study considered that the interest in the sword in the biography of mountain lord was deeply related to the 17th century. Therefore, in order to estimate the time when the biography of mountain lord was created, I paid attention to the age and the corresponding year of the Ban piao specified in the biography of mountain lord. The year when the Ban piao died, it was in 1638 if it was found in the time when the writer survived. In 1638, I looked at the situation the domestic and international in 1638. As a result, it was found that the news that “Hong Taiji of the Qing dynasty died in Joseon society this year. The death of the mountain lord can be placed in an analogy with the death of Hong Taiji (the fall of Qing), so the author saw that he created the biography of mountain lord in the hope of a change in the relationship between the Joseon and the Qing dynasty.
Abstract
This paper aimed to characters of mountain lord and periodical allegorical meaning in the new materials of the biography of mountain lord by Dongmyeong Hwang joong-yoon. In the biography of mountain lord Sangun is the posthumous name and its original name is Ban piao. Ban piao’s ancestors were warriors from the Chu state, and Ban piao became king using his power. After his coronation, he was portrayed as a tyrant who used excessive force. In the biography of mountain lord, Ban piao was identified with the emperor of Qin dynasty and was finally evaluated as a fate to be defeated. The author uses historical figures for characterization. First, the main character was given the name of Ban piao, a positive historical character. Ban piao’s two sons, Bangu and Ban cho, are representative of the pen and the sword, respectively, and Ban piao is a person who supported the Emperor Guangwu of Han who ruled the country with the pen and the sword. In this way, the author used various knowledge and information related to Ban piao to express the utility of the sword. Next, Ban Piao’s life is similar to Xiang ji. The writer sees Xiang Ji as a villainous hero in an age of confusion. his confirms to some extent the use of force by Ban Piao before the accession to the throne. However, after his accession to the throne, the abuse of force by Ban piao ended in his own death. This is a negative perception of force. In other words, it is the power to rule in a chaotic age, and the pen to rule in a peaceful age. This study considered that the interest in the sword in the biography of mountain lord was deeply related to the 17th century. Therefore, in order to estimate the time when the biography of mountain lord was created, I paid attention to the age and the corresponding year of the Ban piao specified in the biography of mountain lord. The year when the Ban piao died, it was in 1638 if it was found in the time when the writer survived. In 1638, I looked at the situation the domestic and international in 1638. As a result, it was found that the news that “Hong Taiji of the Qing dynasty died in Joseon society this year. The death of the mountain lord can be placed in an analogy with the death of Hong Taiji (the fall of Qing), so the author saw that he created the biography of mountain lord in the hope of a change in the relationship between the Joseon and the Qing dynasty.
참고문헌 (51)
- "한국국학진흥원 디지털콘텐츠 유교문화"[URL]
- "東溟先祖遺墨, 山君傳", ~
- 김동협, "｢천군기(天君紀)｣ 고찰(考察)", 퇴계학과 유교문화, 16 (1988)
- 김동협, "四代紀 고찰", 東國大學校慶州캠퍼스論文集, 8 (1989)
- 김동협, "玉皇紀 考察", 동방한문학, (5), pp.101~116 (1989), 동방한문학회
- 金東協, "黃中允 小說 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1990
- 신해진, "黃中允의 政治的 立場과 달천몽유록", 국어국문학, 118 (1997)
- 정출헌, "탄금대 전투에 대한 기억과 두 편의 <달천몽유록>", 고소설연구, (29), pp.149~180 (2010), 한국고소설학회
- 김수영, "『천군기』 연구", 박사, 국문학, pp.2011
- 조안나, "〈사대기〉의 표현특질과 주제의식", 석사, 국어국문학과, pp.2014
- 황중윤, "황중윤 한문소설 逸史ㆍ三皇衍義" (2014), 새문사
- 황중윤, "국역 동명선생문집 1" (2015), 한국국학진흥원
- 황중윤, "국역 동명선생문집 2" (2015), 한국국학진흥원
- 김용기, "황중윤의 <四代紀>에 나타난 현실적 국가관 -循環論에 의한 王朝交替를 중심으로-", 국어교육, (158), pp.83~107 (2017), 한국어교육학회
- 김용기, "<옥황기>의 천명과 권선징악에 나타난 작가의식", 한국문학과 예술, (21), pp.231~252 (2017), 사단법인 한국문학과예술연구소
- 김수영, "<天君紀>의 <三國志演義> 援用 양상과 의미", 대동한문학(大東漢文學), 57(57), pp.241~277 (2018), 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회)[DOI]
- 이성형, "東溟 黃中允의 漢詩 硏究 - 對明 使行詩를 中心으로 -", 한국문학이론과 비평, 23(4), pp.35~67 (2019), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 홍현성, "동명(東溟) 황중윤(黃中允) 「사대기(四代紀)」 연구", 영주어문, 45, pp.5~31 (2020), 영주어문학회[DOI]
- 박혜민, "<사대기>에 나타난 왕조계승과 화이관", 고소설연구, (52), pp.5~30 (2021), 한국고소설학회
- 김수영, "황중윤(黃中允) 작품의 도가(道家) 수용과그 의의", 한국문학논총, (88), pp.5~32 (2021), 한국문학회[DOI]
- 이성형, "東溟 黃中允의 한시에 나타난 교유 양상 고찰", 동방한문학, (89), pp.115~152 (2021), 동방한문학회[DOI]
- 이홍식, "東溟 黃中允의 사행기록, 『西征日錄』의 사행문학적 가치 탐색", 동방학, (47), pp.33~60 (2022), 동양고전연구소[DOI]
- 김창룡, "韓中假傳文學의 硏究", pp.61~82 (1985), 開文社
- 裴鉶, "傳奇 宁茵", ~
- "春秋左氏傳 魯宣公 4年", ~
- "漢書 敍傳", ~
- 윤정, "朝鮮 中宗ㆍ英祖代『大學衍義補』 進講의 의미", 규장각, (24), pp.77~102 (2001), 규장각한국학연구원
- "大學衍義補 권121, 治國平天下, 嚴武備", ~
- 李時善, "歷代史選 卷10, 東漢紀, 世祖光武皇帝", ~
- 최진경, "林悌의 「靑燈論史」 연구 ― 「杯羹論」ㆍ「烏江賦」에 드러난 ‘項羽’형상을 중심으로 ―", 한민족문화연구, 45(45), pp.7~33 (2014), 한민족문화학회[DOI]
- 하윤섭, "‘항우’에 대한 기억의 변화와 조선 후기의 문학적 재현", 고전과 해석, 22, pp.155~189 (2017), 고전문학한문학연구학회
- "동명선생문집 권3", ~
- 양중석, "《漢書·陳勝項籍傳》을 통해 본 班固의 저술 경향", 중국문학, 74, pp.23~39 (2013), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- "逸史, 옥황기", ~
- 남은경, "東溟 鄭斗卿의 ｢山君傳｣ 연구", 東洋古典硏究, 9 (1997)
- 김창룡, "｢山君傳｣注疏", 동방학지, 64 (1989)
- "계암일록", ~
- 김령, "국역 계암일록 6" (2013), 한국국학진흥원
- 이재경, "병자호란 이후 朝明 비밀접촉의 전개", 군사, (103), pp.233~278 (2017), 국방부군사편찬연구소[DOI]
- 이재경, "『계암일록溪巖日錄』을 통해 본 병자호란 직후 명·청전쟁 관련 풍문과 가짜뉴스", 국학연구, (50), pp.183~229 (2023), 한국국학진흥원[DOI]
- 박민수, "1644년 山海關 전투와 淸軍의 北京 입성", 중국사연구, (110), pp.103~145 (2017), 중국사학회[DOI]
- 최석기, "국역 동명선생문집 1" (2015), 한국국학진흥원
- 이남면, "병자호란의 기억, 그 시적 형상화", 동방한문학, (68), pp.151~182 (2016), 동방한문학회[DOI]
- 백진우, "전란의 기억과 문학적 극복 — 정묘⋅병자호란 이후 17세기 후반에 나타난 문학적 현상에 주목하여 —", 동양고전연구, (68), pp.69~97 (2017), 동양고전학회[DOI]
- 김홍백, "조선 지성사에서의 王道와 覇道 담론", 고전문학연구, (60), pp.249~311 (2021), 한국고전문학회[DOI]
- "東溟先生文集 권4", ~
- "莊子, 田子方", ~
- "광해군일기", ~
- "東溟先生文集 권2, 聞西虜深入", ~
- "東溟先生文集 권5, 上大人", ~
- "東溟先生文集권1, 入遼城 二首", ~