<管城侯傳>의 立傳 樣相 連繫性
The aspects to deal with materials and the connection reflected in Kwanseonghoojeon(管城侯傳)
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This thesis is intended to study Kwanseonghoojeon(管城侯傳) written by Kwonbyok(權擘) in the light of the aspects selecting and using the subject matter, the allegorical meanings, and the status in the literary history. This work is worth giving significance in the literary history in that it was the first created one known to date of all the works of Kajeon Literature(假傳文學) that treated a writing brush as a subject matter. In the categorical feature, it adhered to the basic style of Sakiyeojeon(史記列傳), and it used the terms of Sassichanwal(史氏贊 曰) in commenting formality. It confirms the direct influence of Manseokgunlamunjeon(萬石君羅文 傳) and Kwancheosamuojimyoung(管處士墓誌銘), not to mention <管城侯傳>의 立傳 樣相과 連繫性 169 Samunyuchi(事文類聚), in the aspects selecting and using the subject matter. In the theme, it bears resemblance to MoonsuengSahoojeon(文崇四侯 傳) by Moonsueng(文崇) in that it admired winning a king's favor and returning home loaded with honors. Finally, it deserves to our attention in that through the work we come to discover the growth and the subsequent development of the literatures of personification and Kajeon Literature(假傳文學) in the early-Joseon Dynasy.
Abstract
This thesis is intended to study Kwanseonghoojeon(管城侯傳) written by Kwonbyok(權擘) in the light of the aspects selecting and using the subject matter, the allegorical meanings, and the status in the literary history. This work is worth giving significance in the literary history in that it was the first created one known to date of all the works of Kajeon Literature(假傳文學) that treated a writing brush as a subject matter. In the categorical feature, it adhered to the basic style of Sakiyeojeon(史記列傳), and it used the terms of Sassichanwal(史氏贊 曰) in commenting formality. It confirms the direct influence of Manseokgunlamunjeon(萬石君羅文 傳) and Kwancheosamuojimyoung(管處士墓誌銘), not to mention <管城侯傳>의 立傳 樣相과 連繫性 169 Samunyuchi(事文類聚), in the aspects selecting and using the subject matter. In the theme, it bears resemblance to MoonsuengSahoojeon(文崇四侯 傳) by Moonsueng(文崇) in that it admired winning a king's favor and returning home loaded with honors. Finally, it deserves to our attention in that through the work we come to discover the growth and the subsequent development of the literatures of personification and Kajeon Literature(假傳文學) in the early-Joseon Dynasy.
참고문헌 (28)
- 權 擘, "習齋集 In: 한국한문학자료총서 4권(고려대 중앙도서관, 신활자본(D-A553))" (1995), 민창문화사
- 金馹孫, "<管處士墓誌銘> In: 속동문선 권20(고전국역총서 동문선)", 민족문화추진회
- 具滋武編, "韓國文房諸友詩文譜(上中下)" (1994), 보경문화사
- 雷瑨編, "古今滑稽文選" (1979), 대만 광문서국
- "四庫全書, 제 843책, 子部149", 譜錄類(대만 상무인서관 발행)
- 蘇易簡, "文房四譜, 欽定四庫全書, 子部 9", pp.843-1~843-62
- 張 英, "淵鑑類函 권205", pp.13~14, 文學部
- 祝 穆, "事文類聚, 地(別集 권14) In: 文房四友部" (1985), 서광학술자료사
- 김삼대자, "朝鮮時代文房諸具" (1992), 국립중앙박물관
- 金昌龍, "韓中假傳文學의 硏究" (1985), 개문사
- 金昌龍, "假傳 30선" (2000), 태학사
- 金昌龍, "가전문학의 이론" (2001), 박이정
- 金昌龍, "가전을 읽는 방식" (2006), 제이앤씨
- 김현룡, "韓中小說說話比較硏究" (1976), 일지사
- 安秉烈, "韓國假傳 硏究" (1986), 이우출판사
- 安秉卨, "蘇東坡의 假傳考", 중국문학보, (2) (1975), 단국대학교
- 安秉卨, "傳의 文學的 變容", 한국학논총, 2 (1979), 국민대 한국학연구소
- 安秉卨, "寓言傳記의 形式과 題材", 중국학논총, 4 (1988), 국민대 중국문제연구소
- 柳奇玉, "存齋 朴允黙의 假傳 硏究", 인문논총, 23 (1993), 전북대 인문과학연구소
- 柳奇玉, "文房四友의 文學的 變容-<文崇四侯傳> 評釋을 중심으로 In: 韓國語文學論考" (1996), 태학사
- 柳奇玉, "安 曄의 文房四友傳 硏究", 국어문학, 33 (1998), 국어문학회
- 柳奇玉, "文房四友系 假傳文學의 變移樣相과 意味", 한국언어문학, 41 (1998), 한국언어문학회
- 柳奇玉, "韓中 文房四友系 假傳의 文學的 變容樣相과 意味", 한국언어문학, 43 (1999), 한국언어문학회
- 柳奇玉, "申弘遠의 四友列傳 硏究", 한국언어문학, 51 (2003), 한국언어문학회
- 李炳赫, "李穀의 竹夫人傳 In: 韓國漢文學의 探究" (2003), 국학자료원
- 정민, "목릉문단과 석주 권필 In: 習齋 權擘의 문학과 習齋集에 대하여" (1999), 태학사
- 趙南權, "韓國古典批評論 資料集" (1998), 태학사
- 曺壽鶴, "假傳의 編綴性 In: 영남어문학 1권" (1974), 영남어문학회