1621년 조선․명 사절의 해로사행에 관한 실상과 평가
The Truth and Evaluation of Chosun(朝鮮) - Ming(明) Envoy’s Maritime Journey in 1621
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This thesis places an importance on studying exactly the matters of what were the painstaking efforts and arrangement provided by Joseon(朝鮮) and their role and achievement through investigating the first maritime envoy journey accidently done in the first half of 17thcentury. Joseon and Ming(明) China reopened Maritime route of envoy journey in 1621 because the inland route was blocked in the result of Houjin(後金; 淸)’s occupation of Liaodong peninsula. Joseon government exploited the first maritime route of envoy journey to make two Ming envoys Liu Hongxun(劉鴻訓) and Yang daoyin(楊道寅) return to China and to send Joseon envoys Choe Eungheo(崔應虛), An Gyeong(安璥), Kwon Jingi(權盡己) and Ryu Yeohang(柳汝恒) to China. Joseon government constructed two ships imminently for the convenience and safety of Ming envoys and mobilized many people to escort them and seamen to make a fleet in large scale which amount to 22 vessels. The maritime route was starting from Anjoo(安州) of Pyeongyang Province(平安道) through sea area of southern Liaodong(遼東) to Dengzhou(登州) of Shandong(山東). However, the fleet met with disaster in a large scale due to the lack of experience and unusual weather. Nine vessels were wrecked by a intense storm and they lost many people and many goods were damaged. Liu Hongxun, Choe Eungheo and Kwon Jingi escaped narrowly just before wrecking. Ming envoys felt confidence toward Joseon envoys who in charge of the journey more and more as maritime journey carried on. Some sense of community established among them. Humane trust among them provided a good opportunity to escape formal diplomatic attitude. On studying the truth of development of maritime route of envoy journey in the first half of 17thcentury, we realize that the role and the achievement in the side of Joseon were not evaluated properly which were hidden by Chinese criticism which overemphasized on the achievement of Ming envoys.
Abstract
This thesis places an importance on studying exactly the matters of what were the painstaking efforts and arrangement provided by Joseon(朝鮮) and their role and achievement through investigating the first maritime envoy journey accidently done in the first half of 17thcentury. Joseon and Ming(明) China reopened Maritime route of envoy journey in 1621 because the inland route was blocked in the result of Houjin(後金; 淸)’s occupation of Liaodong peninsula. Joseon government exploited the first maritime route of envoy journey to make two Ming envoys Liu Hongxun(劉鴻訓) and Yang daoyin(楊道寅) return to China and to send Joseon envoys Choe Eungheo(崔應虛), An Gyeong(安璥), Kwon Jingi(權盡己) and Ryu Yeohang(柳汝恒) to China. Joseon government constructed two ships imminently for the convenience and safety of Ming envoys and mobilized many people to escort them and seamen to make a fleet in large scale which amount to 22 vessels. The maritime route was starting from Anjoo(安州) of Pyeongyang Province(平安道) through sea area of southern Liaodong(遼東) to Dengzhou(登州) of Shandong(山東). However, the fleet met with disaster in a large scale due to the lack of experience and unusual weather. Nine vessels were wrecked by a intense storm and they lost many people and many goods were damaged. Liu Hongxun, Choe Eungheo and Kwon Jingi escaped narrowly just before wrecking. Ming envoys felt confidence toward Joseon envoys who in charge of the journey more and more as maritime journey carried on. Some sense of community established among them. Humane trust among them provided a good opportunity to escape formal diplomatic attitude. On studying the truth of development of maritime route of envoy journey in the first half of 17thcentury, we realize that the role and the achievement in the side of Joseon were not evaluated properly which were hidden by Chinese criticism which overemphasized on the achievement of Ming envoys.
참고문헌 (13)
- 迎接都, "朝鮮迎接天使都監都廳儀軌" (1932), 年北平故宮博物院刊本
- 安璥, "駕海朝天錄", 하버드 연경도서관
- 朝鮮官, "(辛酉)皇華集", 梨花女大藏本, ~
- 劉鴻訓, "四素山房集", 四庫未收書輯刊, 6(21) (1997), 北京出版社
- 吳煜煜, "石壁採璞" (2011), 方志出版社
- 郭濟生, "一段被遺忘的中朝交往關系史", 海交史研究, (1)통권 : 37 (2000)
- 萬明, "明代后期中朝关系的重要史实见证; 李朝档案 ≪朝鲜迎接天使都监都厅仪轨≫ 管 窥, In 明代中外關系史論稿" (2011), 中國社會科學出版社
- 王玉杰, "論劉鴻訓在明末中朝交往中的貢獻", 山東敎育學院學報, (2) (2006)
- 吳翠梅, "劉鴻訓出使朝鮮“貪墨無比”辯", 滄桑, (1) (2011)
- 姜維東, "劉鴻訓、楊道寅與 辛酉皇華集", 長春師範學院學報, 30(3) (2011)
- 朴現圭, "高麗․朝鮮시대 海路 使行錄에 투영된 媽祖 분석", 歷史民俗學, 32 (2010), 韓國歷史民俗學會
- 박현규, "1621년 명 등극조사의 ‘貪墨無比’에 관한 논란과 실상", 한중인문학연구, 35(35), pp.357~384 (2012), 한중인문학회
- 박현규, "명 監軍 梁之垣 朝鮮出使 시기 해상활동에 관한 분석", 한중인문학연구, 39(39), pp.359~384 (2013), 한중인문학회
