본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어판 도덕기반사전 제작 및 활용: 7 국내 5개 언론사 사설의 도덕기반 분석

Development and Application of the Korean Moral Foundations Dictionary: Analyzing the Use of Moral Language in Editorials of Five South Korean Newspapers

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류신문방송학

초록

본 연구는 도덕기반사전(moral foundations dictionary; Graham et al., 2009)을 영한번역 해 한국어판 도덕기반사전을 제작함으로써, 도덕기반이론(moral foundations theory; Haidt, 2012)을 바탕으로 한국어 텍스트에 담겨 있는 도덕적 가치관을 분석하고자 하는 연구자들에게 기초적인 방법론적 도구를 제공하고자 했다. 본 논문은 크게 두 부분으로 구성된다. 먼저, 한국어판 도덕기반사전 및 그 제작과정을 소개했다. 연구자의 자의 성을 최대한 배제한 상태에서 효율적으로 영한번역 작업을 수행하기 위해 채택한 반자 동화된(semi-automated) 방식의 제작과정을 상세히 기술했다. 다음으로, 이렇게 만들어진 한국어판 도덕기반사전을 활용한 사례연구로, 국내 5개 종합일간지(<경향신 문>, <동아일보>, <중앙일보>, <조선일보>, <한겨레>)에서 작성한 사설에 등장하는 도덕기반 관련 어휘를 분석했다.먼저 해당 시기 사설 전체에 대한 분석을수행한 후(사례연구1; N = 10,174), 이 중 도덕적 가치관과 관련도가 높은 세 가지 사회적·정치적 사안을 선정해 관련 사설들에 대한 추가 분석을 실시했다(사례연구 2; N = 848). 연 구결과의 방법론적·이론적 함의를 논의했다.

Abstract

We developed a Korean version of the moral foundations dictionary (K-MFD) by translating the original moral foundations dictionary (MFD; Graham et al., 2009). Our goal in undertaking this endeavor was to provide a basic tool for researchers who seek to analyze moral language embedded in Korean texts. The paper consists of the following two parts. First, we provided a detailed description of how we developed the K-MFD, with a particular emphasis on the use of semi-automated methods to minimize subjectivity in conducting English-to-Korean translations. Then, the K-MFD was applied to analyze moral language usage in editorials published by five major newspapers in South Korea (Case Study 1; N = 10,174). Of these editorials, those that covered three morally charged socio-political issues were selected for additional analyses (Case Study 2; N = 848). Findings are discussed in light of their methodological and theoretical implications.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. 김효은, "빅데이터를 활용한 도덕기반 텍스트분석: 입시 기사를 중심으로", 디지털콘텐츠학회논문지, 21(6), pp.1159~1169 (2020), 한국디지털콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  2. 류원식, "도덕기반이 정치이념, 정치적 의견표명, 관용에 미치는 효과", 한국언론학보, 61(5), pp.491~525 (2017), 한국언론학회[DOI]
  3. 백영민, "R를 이용한 텍스트 마이닝" (2020), 한울
  4. 석승혜, "한국의 중도집단은 탈도덕적인가?: 이념성향에 따른 도덕성 기반 비교를 중심으로", 한국사회학, 49(5), pp.113~149 (2015), 한국사회학회
  5. 송현주, "도덕 기반의 활성화가 정책 사안에 대한 도덕적 판단에 미치는 영향", 언론정보연구, 54(4), pp.145~176 (2017), 언론정보연구소[DOI]
  6. 이재호, "정치성향에 따른 도덕판단기준의 차이", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 28(1), pp.1~26 (2014), 한국사회및성격심리학회[DOI]
  7. 정은경, "한국인을 대상으로 한 도덕적 기반 질문지 적용에 대한 연구", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 30(3), pp.47~61 (2016), 한국사회및성격심리학회[DOI]
  8. Cameron, A. C., "Regression analysis of count data" (2013), Cambridge University Press
  9. Chan, C. -h., "Four best practices for measuring news sentiment using ‘off-the-shelf’ dictionaries : A large-scale p-hacking experiment", Computational Communication Research, 3, pp.1~27 (2021)[DOI]
  10. Clifford, S., "How words do the work of politics : Moral foundations theory and the debate over stem cell research", The Journal of Politics, 75, pp.659~671 (2013)[DOI]
  11. Dehghani, M., "Purity homophily in social networks", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 145, pp.366~375 (2016)[DOI]
  12. Faulkner, J., "Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes", Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, pp.333~353 (2004)[DOI]
  13. Feinberg, M., "The moral roots of environmental attitudes", Psychological Science, 24, pp.56~62 (2013)[DOI]
  14. Feinberg, M., "From gulf to bridge : When do moral arguments facilitate political influence", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, pp.1665~1681 (2015)[DOI]
  15. Garten, J., "Morality between the lines : Detecting moral sentiment in text", Paper presented at the IJCAI 2016 Workshop on Computational Modeling of Attitudes (2016)
  16. Graham, J., "Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 47)" (2013), Academic Press
  17. Graham, J., "Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, pp.1029~1046 (2009)[DOI]
  18. Graham, J., "Mapping the moral domain", Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 101, pp.366~ (2011)[DOI]
  19. Haidt, J., "The righteous mind : Why good people are divided by politics and religion" (2012), Pantheon Books
  20. Haidt, J., "Handbook of social psychology", pp.797~832 (2010), Wiley & Sons
  21. Hoover, J., "Atlas of moral psychology", pp.525~536 (2018), Guilford
  22. Hoover, J., "Moral framing and charitable donation : Integrating exploratory social media analyses and confirmatory experimentation", Collabra : Psychology, 4, pp.9~ (2018)[DOI]
  23. Hopp, F. R., "The extended Moral Foundations Dictionary(eMFD) : Development and applications of a crowd-sourced approach to extracting moral intuitions from text", Behavior Research Methods, 53, pp.232~246 (2021)[DOI]
  24. Kidwell, B., "Getting liberals and conservatives to go green : Political ideology and congruent appeals", Journal of Consumer Research, 40, pp.350~367 (2013)[DOI]
  25. Koleva, S. P., "Tracing the threads : How five moral concerns(especially Purity)help explain culture war attitudes", Journal of Research in Personality, 46, pp.184~194 (2012)[DOI]
  26. Lakoff, G., "The all new don't think of an elephant! : Know your values and frame the debate" (2014), Chelsea Green Publishing
  27. Leidner, B., "Morality shifting in the context of intergroup violence", European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, pp.82~91 (2012)[DOI]
  28. Lewis, R. J., "Large-scale patterns of entertainment gratifications in linguistic content of U. S. films", Communication Studies, 68, pp.422~438 (2017)[DOI]
  29. Lipsitz, K., "Playing with emotions : The effect of moral appeals in elite rhetoric", Political Behavior, 40, pp.57~78 (2018)[DOI]
  30. Miles, M. R., "Presidential appeals to moral foundations : How modern presidents persuade cross-ideologues", Policy Studies Journal, 44, pp.471~490 (2016)[DOI]
  31. Mokhberian N., "Moral framing and ideological bias of news", Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Social Informatics, Pisa, Italy (2020)
  32. Mooijman, M., "Moralization in social networks and the emergence of violence during protests", Nature Human Behaviour, 2, pp.389~ (2018)[DOI]
  33. Neiman, J. L., "Speaking different languages or reading from the same script? Word usage of Democratic and Republican politicians", Political Communication, 33, pp.212~240 (2016)[DOI]
  34. Sagi, E., "Measuring moral rhetoric in text", Social Science Computer Review, 32, pp.132~144 (2014)[DOI]
  35. Skurka, C., "All things being equal : Distinguishing proportionality and equity in moral reasoning", Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11, pp.374~387 (2020)[DOI]
  36. Tamborini, R., "The influence of media exposure on the accessibility of moral intuitions and associated affect", Journal of Media Psychology, 30, pp.79~90 (2018)[DOI]
  37. van Atteveldt, W., "The validity of sentiment analysis : Comparing manual annotation, crowdcoding, dictionary approaches, and machine learning algorithms", Communication Methods and Measures, 15, pp.121~140 (2021)[DOI]
  38. Voelkel, J. G., "Morally reframed arguments can affect support for political candidates", Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, pp.917~924 (2018)[DOI]
  39. Wang, R., "Moral framing and information virality in social movements : A case study of #HongKongPoliceBrutality", Communication Monographs, 88, pp.350~370 (2021)[DOI]
  40. Weber, R., "Extracting latent moral information from text narratives : Relevance, challenges, and solutions", Communication Methods and Measures, 12, pp.119~139 (2018)[DOI]
  41. Wheeler, M. A., "Twentieth century morality: The rise and fall of moral concepts from 1900 to 2007", PloS one, 14, pp.e0212267~ (2007)[DOI]
  42. Wolsko, C., "Expanding the range of environmental values : Political orientation, moral foundations, and the common ingroup", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, pp.284~294 (2017)[DOI]
  43. Xu, W. W., "What drives hyper-partisan news sharing : Exploring the role of source, style, and content", Digital Journalism, 8, pp.486~505 (2020)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)