한중 지역별 해면어업의 기술적 생산효율성 비교분석
Comparative Analysis of Productive Efficiencies in Adjacent Water Fisheries in Korea and China Local Autonomus Entities
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is to analyze productive efficiencies in adjacent water fisheries with respect to Korea and China local governments using various models of Data Envlopment Analyis. The average estimates of technical, pure technical and scale efficiencies in Korea are turned out to be 61.8%, 76.5%, and 82.9% respectively while those estimates in China are 69.4%, 87.5%, and 81.1%. Once the local governments in both countries are pooled together, corresponding estimates are calculated as 64.4%, 81.0%, and 81.9% respectively. The study found a statistical significance of the existence of heterogeneity in productive efficiencies between two countries by conducting a rank-sum test to the bilateral-DEA model. The study extracted some policy implications to improve the efficiencies of both countries. Korea has to exercise more efforts to improve scale efficiencies while China has to put efforts to improve their pure technical efficiencies by adjusting the combinations of fishing efforts. The calculated reduction ratios in fishing efforts suggest that Korea needs to reconstruct its fishing industry by accelerating the downsizing plan of total number of fishing ships mainly focusing on small ships to better cope with FTA between Korea and China.
Abstract
This study is to analyze productive efficiencies in adjacent water fisheries with respect to Korea and China local governments using various models of Data Envlopment Analyis. The average estimates of technical, pure technical and scale efficiencies in Korea are turned out to be 61.8%, 76.5%, and 82.9% respectively while those estimates in China are 69.4%, 87.5%, and 81.1%. Once the local governments in both countries are pooled together, corresponding estimates are calculated as 64.4%, 81.0%, and 81.9% respectively. The study found a statistical significance of the existence of heterogeneity in productive efficiencies between two countries by conducting a rank-sum test to the bilateral-DEA model. The study extracted some policy implications to improve the efficiencies of both countries. Korea has to exercise more efforts to improve scale efficiencies while China has to put efforts to improve their pure technical efficiencies by adjusting the combinations of fishing efforts. The calculated reduction ratios in fishing efforts suggest that Korea needs to reconstruct its fishing industry by accelerating the downsizing plan of total number of fishing ships mainly focusing on small ships to better cope with FTA between Korea and China.
참고문헌 (20)
- 한중 FTA 협상진행에 따른 충남농림수산업 대응방안 연구 – 민감품목 도출(안) 중심으로-, "강마야", 충남발전연구원, ~, pp.2013권 3호 (2014)
- 김승섭, "한중 FTA 협상에 해운서비스 제외 고려해야", 해양한국, 2014(10), pp.127~131 (2014), 한국해사문제연구소
- 김시중, "한중 경제관계의 평가와 한중 FTA 전망", 국제통상연구, 12(3), pp.135~158 (2007), 한국국제통상학회
- 한중 FTA에 따른 어업분야 영향 및 대책, "김종화", 충남발전연구원, ~, pp.2013권 9호 (2013)
- 박영진, "한중 FTA 교육서비스 분야의 대응방안 연구", 한중사회과학연구, 11(1), pp.223~249 (2013), 한중사회과학학회
- 손병해, "한중 FTA 사전점검: 한중 FTA 왜 필요한가 –한국에 유리한 국제분업구조창출할 기회-", CHINDIA Plus, 10, pp.33~35 (2007), 포스코경영연구소
- 안경애, "퍼지 의사결정 방법론을 이용한 한미 · 한중 FTA가 산업 및 고용에 미치는 효과 비교", 무역학회지, 35(2), pp.49~81 (2010), 한국무역학회
- 이치명, "한중일 FTA 임업부문 현황 및 협상전략", 산림과학 공동학술발표 논문집, 2012, pp.795~799 (2012), 한국임학회
- 최상미, "스페셜 리포트: 속도 붙은 한중 FTA 논의, 쟁점은?: 자동차, 철강, 전자 분야실익 예상", CHINDIA Plus, 47, pp.54~57 (2010), 포스코경영연구소
- 최정석, "COVER STORY 문화산업으로 중화 브랜드를 꿈꾼다: 한중 FTA 영화산업개방화 협상전략", CHINDIA Plus, 80, pp.29~31 (2013), 포스코경영연구소
- 황기식, "지식재산권 이론을 통해 본 한중일 FTA 협상 시의 시사점", 국제정치연구, 15(2), pp.171~190 (2012), 동아시아국제정치학회
- Anderson, P., "A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis", Management Science, 39(10), pp.1261~1264 (1993)
- Banker, R. D., "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analyis", Management Science, 30, pp.1078~1092 (1984)
- Charnes, A., "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units", European Jouranal of Operation Research, 2, pp.429~444 (1978)
- Charnes, A., "Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through", Management Science, 27, pp.668~697 (1981)
- Seiford, L. M., "Infeasibility of Super-Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis Models", INFORS, 37, pp.174~187 (1999)
- Stewart, T. J., "Data Envelopment Analysis and Mutiple Criterion Decision Making – A Response", Omega, 22, pp.205~206 (1996)
- Tofallis, C., "Improving Discernment in DEA Using Profiling", Omega, 24, pp.229~244 (1996)
- Tone, K., "Data Envelopment Analysis" (1993), JUSE Press, Ltd
- Tone, K., "A Slack-Based Measurement of Super-Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis", European Jouranal of Operation Research, 143, pp.32~41 (2002)