니체의 초인은 부처인가
Is Nietzsche’s Overman Buddha
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
According to the view-point that occupies the leading position in the history of comparative research of Nietzsche’s philosophy and Buddhism so far, there are strong similarities between the two and Nietzsche’s Overman is identical with Buddha. Contrary to this view-point, this article tries to demonstrate that between Nietzsche’s philosophy and Buddhism the differences are more fundamental than the similarities, even though it is undeniable that there are certain similarities between the two. And unlike the existing researches that tried to reveal the differences between Nietzsche’s philosophy and Buddhism by taking Nietzsche’s thoughts of the eternal return of the same and the concept of the will to power as major clues for the comparison, this article will show the differences between the two and the limits of Nietzsche’s philosophy more concretely and more clearly by comparing Nietzsche’s and buddhist views on the virtues that the ideal human-beings should realize. Nietzsche finds such virtues in pride, pathos of distance, flush vigor, strong and tough spirit, while Buddhism finds such virtues in love and kindness, pity and caring, sharing the joys of all living beings, calmness. In addition, Nietzsche finds the rul-ing principle of the world in the war between all things like Heraclitus,while Buddhism thinks that all things in the world help each other. On the basis of these comparisons, we can say that Nietzsche’s philosophy was not able to overcome the spirit that sees itself as being confronted with the other people and the world.
Abstract
According to the view-point that occupies the leading position in the history of comparative research of Nietzsche’s philosophy and Buddhism so far, there are strong similarities between the two and Nietzsche’s Overman is identical with Buddha. Contrary to this view-point, this article tries to demonstrate that between Nietzsche’s philosophy and Buddhism the differences are more fundamental than the similarities, even though it is undeniable that there are certain similarities between the two. And unlike the existing researches that tried to reveal the differences between Nietzsche’s philosophy and Buddhism by taking Nietzsche’s thoughts of the eternal return of the same and the concept of the will to power as major clues for the comparison, this article will show the differences between the two and the limits of Nietzsche’s philosophy more concretely and more clearly by comparing Nietzsche’s and buddhist views on the virtues that the ideal human-beings should realize. Nietzsche finds such virtues in pride, pathos of distance, flush vigor, strong and tough spirit, while Buddhism finds such virtues in love and kindness, pity and caring, sharing the joys of all living beings, calmness. In addition, Nietzsche finds the rul-ing principle of the world in the war between all things like Heraclitus,while Buddhism thinks that all things in the world help each other. On the basis of these comparisons, we can say that Nietzsche’s philosophy was not able to overcome the spirit that sees itself as being confronted with the other people and the world.
참고문헌 (65)
- "MA: Menschliches, Allzumenschliches I, Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, IV-2, Berlin", ~ (1967)
- "JGB: Jenseits von Gut und Bo¨se, Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe,Ⅵ-2, Berlin", ~ (1968)
- "GM: Zur Genealogie der Moral, Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Ⅵ-2, Berlin", ~ (1968)
- "AC: Der Antichrist, Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, IV-3, Berlin", ~ (1967)
- "EH: Ecce homo, Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Ⅵ-3, Berlin․New York", ~ (1968)
- "WM: Der Wille zur Macht, Stuttgart, Alfred Kröner Verlag, Stuttgart", ~ (1996)
- F. Nietzsche, "Go¨tzen-Da¨mmerung, Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Ⅵ-3, Berlin", ~ (1969)
- F. Nietzsche, "Mogenro¨te, Nachgelassene Fragmente Anfang 1880 bis Fru¨hjahr 1881, Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, V-1", ~ (1971)
- F. Nietzsche, "Die Philosophie im tragischen Zeitalter der Griechen", Nachgelassene Fragmente Anfang 1888 bis Anfang Januar 1889, Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, III-2, ~ (1973)
- F. Nietzsche, "Nachgelassene Fragmente Juli 1882 bis Winter 1883", 84, Nietzsche Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe, VII-1, 1977
- 니체, "비극의 탄생" (2007), 아카넷
- 니체, "선악의 저편ㆍ도덕의 계보" (2002), 책세상
- 니체, "차라투스트라는 이렇게 말했다" (2000), 책세상
- 니체, "유고 1887년 가을－1888년 3월" (2004), 책세상
- 고익진, "한글 아함경" (1996), 동국대학교 출판부
- 길희성, "오늘에 풀어보는 동양사상" (1999), 철학과 현실사
- 미산, "미산스님 초기경전 강의" (2010), 명진출판
- 원효, "대승기신론 소․별기" (1991), 일지사
- J. 스태프니, "서양철학과 禪" (1994), 민족사
- 폴 윌리엄스, "인도불교사상" (2001), 씨․아이․알
- E. 콘즈, "불교사상과 서양철학" (1993), 민족사
- E. 콘즈, "한글세대를 위한 불교" (1990), 세계사
- E. 콘즈, "인도불교철학사" (1988), 민족사
- 곽만연, "불교의 공사상과 니이체의 니힐리즘의 현대적 의의, In 니이체 철학의 현대적 이해와 수용" (1999), 세종출판사
- 니체 연구, "니체와 불교의 만남-니체의 불교 이해 및 서양적 무아(무아)사상을 중심으로", 니체 연구, 8 (2005), 한국니체학회
- 김 진, "니체와 불교적 사유", 철학연구, 89, pp.23~56 (2004), 대한철학회
- 두행숙, "프리드리히 니체의 동양사상으로의 접근과 일탈에 대한 고찰", 카프카연구, 8 (2000), 한국카프카학회
- 박경일, "불교, 니체, 그리고 포스트모더니즘", 동서비교문학저널, (a) (1999), 한국동서비교문학학회
- 박경일, "탈근대 담론들에 나타나는 관계론적 패러다임들과 불교의 공", 인문학연구, (2) (1998), 경희대학교 인문학연구소
- 박경일, "니체와 불교: 비교방법론 서설", 동서비교문학저널, (5) (2001), 한국동서비교문학학회
- 박경일, "니체와 불교 그리고 해체철학", 불교평론, (9) (2001), 불교시대사
- 성진기, "니체와 불교, In 니체 이해의 새로운 지평" (2000), 철학과현실사
- 아베 마사오, "선과 니체, In 선과 현대철학 - 선의 철학적 자리매김은 가능한가" (1996), 대원정사
- 이주향, "니체와 예수, 그리고 금강경:실체성 부정에 관한 고찰", 니체연구, (8), pp.99~118 (2005), 한국니체학회
- 이진우, "니체와 아시아적 사유", 철학연구, 53 (2001), 철학연구회
- 이진우, "니체와 동양 허무주의: 영원회귀인가 아니면 운명의 사랑인가, In 니체, 실험적 사유와 극단의 사상" (2009), 책세상
- 정철호, "허무주의에 대한 니이체와 초기 불교의 연관성, In 니이체 철학의 현대적 이해와 수용" (1999), 세종출판사
- 정영도, "니이체의 힘에의 의지에서 본 기독교와 불교의 Realität, In 니이체 철학의 현대적 이해와 수용" (1999), 세종출판사
- Bilimoria, Purushottama, "Nietzsche as ‘Europe’s Buddha and ‘Asia’s Superman", Sophia, 47 (2008)
- Brobjer, "Nietzsche’s reading about eastern philosophy", Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 28 (2004)
- Davis,Bret W, "Zen after Zrathustra: The Problem of Will in the Confrontation between Nietzsche and Buddhism", Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 28 (2004)
- Elman, Benjamin A, "Nietzsche and Buddhism", Journal of the History of Ideas, 44(4) (1983)
- M. D. Faber, "Back to a Crossroad: Nietzsche, Freud, and the East", New Ideas in Psychology, 6(1) (1988)
- Hanson,Jim, "Searching for the Power–I: Nietzsche and Nirvana", Asian Philosophy, 18(3) (2008)
- "Revaluating Nietzsche and Buddhism: Active and Passive Nihilism"[URL]
- Loy, David, "Beyond good and evil? A Buddhist critique of Nietzsche", Asian Philosophy, 6(1) (1996)
- Morrison, Robert G, "Nietzsche and Buddhism, A Study in Nihilism and Ironic Affinities" (1997), Oxford University Press
- Morrison,Robert G, "Response to Graham Parkes’ review", Philosophy East and West, 50(2) (2000)
- Mystry, Freny, "Nietzsche and Buddhism: Prolegomena to a Comparative Study" (1981), W. de Gruyter
- Okochi, R, "Nietzsches Amor fati im Lichte von Karma des Buddhismus, in: Nietzsche-Studien Band 1, Berlin․New York", ~
- "Omar, Moad, Dukkha, Inaction, and Nirvana: Suffering, Weariness, and Death? - A look at Nietzsche’s Criticisms of Buddhist Philosophy"[URL]
- Parkes, Graham, "Nietzsche and Asian Thought" (1996), University of Chicago Press
- Rudolph, Arthur W, "Nietzsche on Buddhism, Nihilism and Christianity", Philosophy Today, 13, pp.1~ (1969)
- Skowron, Michael, "Nietzsche·Buddha·Zarathustra - eine West-Ost Konfiguration" (2006), Kyungpook National University Press
- Soraj Hongladarom, "The Overman and the Arahant: Models of Human Perfection", Asian Philosophy, 21(1) (2011)
- Welbon, Guy, "The Buddhist Nirvana and its Western Interpreters", ~ (1968)
- 아키라 닛타, "‘ヨ-ロッパの佛陀’ 對 ‘インドの佛陀’ , ニーチエ , 實存思想論集 IX(제2기 제1호), 理想社", ~ (1994)
- 유다 유타카, "ブツダ vs. ニーチエ" (2001), 大東出版社
- 유다 유타카, "ニーチエと 佛敎" (1987), 世界聖典刊行協會
- 유다 유타카, "불교의 서구적 모색" (1990), 민족사
- Welbon, Guy, "The Buddhist Nirvana and its Western Interpreters", ~ (1968)
- 질르 들뢰즈, "니체, 철학의 주사위" (1994), 인간사랑
- M. Heidegger, "Sein und Zeit, Tu¨bingen", ~ (1972)
- Simmel, Georg, "The Morality of Nobility, In Nietzsche: Critical Assessments III" (1998)
- Solomon, R. C, "A More Severe Morality: Nietzsche’s Affirmative Ethics, In The Existentialists - Critical Essays on Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Sartre, Lanham․Boulder" (2004), Oxford