본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국 문화산업 정책 분석과 우리 디지털콘텐츠 기업의 진출 전략 도출

Analysis of the Chinese Cultural Industry Policy for Supporting Korean Digital Contents Firms

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This study explores the market situation and government policies of Chinese cultural industry in order to provide entry suggestions for promoting globalization of Korean digital contents industry. It analyzes how the Chinese market condition has been changed by the policies, and what kinds of entry strategies are appropriate for Korean digital contents firms under the situation that wholly-owned foreign companies are forbidden to provide digital contents-related service in China. On the one hand, Chinese government has protected and fostered cultural industry and domestic market for more than 10 years. Cultural industry is developed as a national strategy for promoting economy growth. On the other hand, as the base of Chinese cultural industry is still weak, Chinese government is devoting to developing more open-oriented and more innovation-oriented ways to boost the growth of cultural industry. Various policies are launched in enhancing independent innovation capacity with own intellectual property rights and brands, helping domestic cultural product providers explore overseas markets to enhance global influence of Chinese culture, and also in promoting cultural services enterprises by using digital technology to provide production, dissemination, marketing, and other services. Several entry suggestions of Korean digital contents firms are made. They are mainly focused on two areas, the first is platform-based online channels. The second is the producer service area. The new generation of network platform business model shows revolutionary innovation power in today’s business. Comparing with traditional supply chain, digital contents products operated by platform are more efficient in approval and with higher profit. Korean firms need to develop more localized and popular contents to face the fast changing netizen’s taste. In addition, Korean firms need to learn how to develop their intellectual property (IP) for “one source multi use”. As for the producer service area, there are three kinds of services with high development potential and successful probability. The first is globalization service for Chinese cultural products. The second is talent cultivation and professional education service for human resource of Chinese cultural industry. The third is small and medium-sized enterprise incubation services, especially focusing on how to help them to build brands, digitalization of traditional promotion methods as well as the creative HR management.

Abstract

This study explores the market situation and government policies of Chinese cultural industry in order to provide entry suggestions for promoting globalization of Korean digital contents industry. It analyzes how the Chinese market condition has been changed by the policies, and what kinds of entry strategies are appropriate for Korean digital contents firms under the situation that wholly-owned foreign companies are forbidden to provide digital contents-related service in China. On the one hand, Chinese government has protected and fostered cultural industry and domestic market for more than 10 years. Cultural industry is developed as a national strategy for promoting economy growth. On the other hand, as the base of Chinese cultural industry is still weak, Chinese government is devoting to developing more open-oriented and more innovation-oriented ways to boost the growth of cultural industry. Various policies are launched in enhancing independent innovation capacity with own intellectual property rights and brands, helping domestic cultural product providers explore overseas markets to enhance global influence of Chinese culture, and also in promoting cultural services enterprises by using digital technology to provide production, dissemination, marketing, and other services. Several entry suggestions of Korean digital contents firms are made. They are mainly focused on two areas, the first is platform-based online channels. The second is the producer service area. The new generation of network platform business model shows revolutionary innovation power in today’s business. Comparing with traditional supply chain, digital contents products operated by platform are more efficient in approval and with higher profit. Korean firms need to develop more localized and popular contents to face the fast changing netizen’s taste. In addition, Korean firms need to learn how to develop their intellectual property (IP) for “one source multi use”. As for the producer service area, there are three kinds of services with high development potential and successful probability. The first is globalization service for Chinese cultural products. The second is talent cultivation and professional education service for human resource of Chinese cultural industry. The third is small and medium-sized enterprise incubation services, especially focusing on how to help them to build brands, digitalization of traditional promotion methods as well as the creative HR management.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Androutsellis-Theotokis, S., "A survey of peer-to-peer content distribution technologies", ACM Computing Surveys, 36(4), pp.335~371 (2004)
  2. Forte, A., "Decentralization in wikipedia governance", Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(1), pp.49~72 (2009)
  3. Chesbrough, H. W., "Open Innovation: the New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology" (2003), Harvard Business School Press
  4. Chesbrough, H. W., "Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm: Researching a New Paradigm" (2008), Oxford University Press
  5. Chesbrough, H. W., "Bringing open innovation to services", MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), pp.85~90 (2011)
  6. Hamari, J., "The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption", Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2015)
  7. iResearch Report, 중국 문화 산업 연구 보고, , ~ (2014)
  8. Creative Economy Report, "UNESCO", ~ (2013)
  9. 중국 국무원 제10차 5개년 계획(2001-2005), , ~ (2005)
  10. 중국 국무원 제11 차 5개년 계획(2006-2010), , ~ (2010)
  11. "중국 국무원 제12 차 5개년 계획(2011-2015)", ~ (2015)
  12. "중국 문화 산업 통계 보고서" (2011), 중국통계 출판사
  13. "중국 문화 산업 통계 보고서" (2012), 중국통계 출판사
  14. "중국 문화 산업 통계 보고서" (2013), 중국통계 출판사
  15. "중국 문화 산업 통계 보고서" (2014), 중국통계 출판사
  16. "중국 오픈 플랫폼 백서" (2015), Tencent

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)