Structural Change and Bipolarization of Korean Agriculture
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the 1990s, the Korean agriculture has walked the path of bipolarization at a fast speed. While the majority farms are small-scale, a few large-scale farms account for most of the national agricultural production. The plain area agriculture, where the large-scale farming is very active, is growing, but the hilly & mountainous area agriculture, where the large-scale farming is inactive, is waning. The agricultural bipolarization is an inevitable phenomenon, which appears in the course of restructuring. It can improve agricultural structure, but at the same time, it can cause conflicts between classes or regions. Advanced countries have taken various policy measures to resolve conflicts stemming from the bipolar agricultural structure. In particular, European countries pushed ahead with agricultural reshuffling in pursuit of industrial efficiency until the 1970s. Thus, the current agricultural policy issue of the Government is to minimize negative aspects, such as conflicts within the agricultural society, while improving the agricultural structure. It is high time to realize agricultural efficiency by pursuing for industrial policy and social-welfare policy in parallel, and minimize class and regional conflicts within the rural community by coordinating right policies. In particular, it should implement the policies favoring the vulnerable classes and regions, such as the direct payment system.
Abstract
In the 1990s, the Korean agriculture has walked the path of bipolarization at a fast speed. While the majority farms are small-scale, a few large-scale farms account for most of the national agricultural production. The plain area agriculture, where the large-scale farming is very active, is growing, but the hilly & mountainous area agriculture, where the large-scale farming is inactive, is waning. The agricultural bipolarization is an inevitable phenomenon, which appears in the course of restructuring. It can improve agricultural structure, but at the same time, it can cause conflicts between classes or regions. Advanced countries have taken various policy measures to resolve conflicts stemming from the bipolar agricultural structure. In particular, European countries pushed ahead with agricultural reshuffling in pursuit of industrial efficiency until the 1970s. Thus, the current agricultural policy issue of the Government is to minimize negative aspects, such as conflicts within the agricultural society, while improving the agricultural structure. It is high time to realize agricultural efficiency by pursuing for industrial policy and social-welfare policy in parallel, and minimize class and regional conflicts within the rural community by coordinating right policies. In particular, it should implement the policies favoring the vulnerable classes and regions, such as the direct payment system.
참고문헌 (13)
- "Inequality of Urban and Fram Household Income: Decomposition of Generalized Entropy Inequality Measures", 45(1) (2004)
- "Did farm consolidation occur in recent Korean agriculture?: Evidence from Change in farm size distribution between 1998 and 2002", 28 (2005)
- "Consolidation and productivity in Korean agriculture" (2004)
- "Analysis of Structural Change in Agriculture based on Agricultural Census" (2005), Korea Rural Economic Institute
- "Regional Agriculture’s Today and Vision" (2005), KREI
- "Acreage distribution in Korean rice farming: A Kernel density analysis", (28), pp.703~716 (2001)
- "Analysis of Low-income Farm Household Economy" (2005), KREI
- "Agricultural Reform in Korea", Korea Development Institute
- "A Study on Regional Agricultural GapGap between General and Disadvantaged Areas" (1999), Agri-science Technology Institute of Chonbuk National Uni
- "Transformation of Agricultural Structure: the start and the end" (1998), KREI
- "Agriculturebased Rural Areas’ Vision and Agricultural Policy" (2004), KREI
- "Current Status of Unstable Farm Household Economy and Causes Analysis" (2003)
- "Annual Report for Agricultural Policy" (2005), Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
