지속가능한 농업으로의 전환: 실천을 위한 이론과 과제
Towards Sustainable Agriculture in Korea: Theoretical Backgrounds and Practical Challenges
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study argues that expanding the multifunctionality of agriculture (MFA) may mitigate existing agricultural problems. To do that this study redefines the concept and scope of the MFA and presents practical tasks to achieve it. Theorizing the MFA begins with the theory of sustainability and first identifies the link between sustainability and MFA. Later, considering the limitations of the existing sustainability theories, we examined where the false linkages leading to the destruction of environmental and social relations originated, and employed the (Re)productivity [(Re)produktivitat] theory in order to obtain alternatives. Research shows that welfare effects of the MFA on humans and the environment are not less than those derived from the agricultural products supplied to the real market, but the values are not recognized. The absence of proper care and compensation is the basis of agricultural problems in Korea. Therefore, this study acknowledges that the MFA is as much worthy as real agricultural production, and insists that appropriate compensation and care should be given to humans (farmers) and nature (agricultural ecosystem) in order to maintain and expand the MFA. In other words, a virtuous cycle between sustainability and the MFA means that the process spreads sustainable farming methods to expand the MFA, forms social consensus on it, and pays fair remuneration for agriculture from the public sector. Transition to such a virtuous cycle requires re-establishing the definition and scope of the MFA, implementing targeting policy, motivating policy targets, strengthening human capacity, and arranging maturity time.
Abstract
This study argues that expanding the multifunctionality of agriculture (MFA) may mitigate existing agricultural problems. To do that this study redefines the concept and scope of the MFA and presents practical tasks to achieve it. Theorizing the MFA begins with the theory of sustainability and first identifies the link between sustainability and MFA. Later, considering the limitations of the existing sustainability theories, we examined where the false linkages leading to the destruction of environmental and social relations originated, and employed the (Re)productivity [(Re)produktivitat] theory in order to obtain alternatives. Research shows that welfare effects of the MFA on humans and the environment are not less than those derived from the agricultural products supplied to the real market, but the values are not recognized. The absence of proper care and compensation is the basis of agricultural problems in Korea. Therefore, this study acknowledges that the MFA is as much worthy as real agricultural production, and insists that appropriate compensation and care should be given to humans (farmers) and nature (agricultural ecosystem) in order to maintain and expand the MFA. In other words, a virtuous cycle between sustainability and the MFA means that the process spreads sustainable farming methods to expand the MFA, forms social consensus on it, and pays fair remuneration for agriculture from the public sector. Transition to such a virtuous cycle requires re-establishing the definition and scope of the MFA, implementing targeting policy, motivating policy targets, strengthening human capacity, and arranging maturity time.
참고문헌 (68)
- Belletti, G, "Les Systemes Agroalimentaires Localises: Produits, Entreprises et Dynamiques Locales", pp.1~22 (2003)
- Bennett, N. J, "Environmental Stewardship: A Conceptual Review and Analytical Framework", Environmental Management., 61(4), pp.597~614 (2018)
- Biesecker, A, "Eine Zukunftsfähige Ökonomie ist Möglich-Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften" (2010)
- Biesecker, A, "Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften: Auf dem Weg zu Einer Ökonomie des Guten Lebens" (2000)
- Biesecker, A, "Die Neuerfindung des Ökonomischen" (2006)
- Biesecker, A, "Focus: (Re)productivity. Sustainable Relations Both Between Society and Nature and Between the Genders", Ecological Economics, 69(8), pp.1703~1711 (2010)
- Biesecker, A, "Nachhaltigkeit Anders Denken", pp.77~91 (2015)
- Bromley, D. W, "Private Property Rights and Presumptive Policy Entitlements: Reconsidering the Premises of Rural Policy", European Review of agricultural economics, 17(2), pp.197~214 (1990)
- Cahill, C, "The Multifunctionality of Agriculture: What Does It Mean?", Euro Choices, 1(1), pp.36~41 (2001)
- Gasson, R, "Conservation through Land Diversion: A Survey of Farmers’ Attitudes", Journal of Agricultural Economics, 39(3), pp.340~351 (1988)
- Garzon, I, ". Multifunctionality of Agriculture in the European Union: Is There Substance Behind the Discourse’s Smoke" (2005), Institute of Governmental Studies
- Giovannucci, D, "Food and Agriculture: the Future of Sustainability" (2012), United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs
- Habermas, J, "Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit" (1990), Frankfurt a. M
- Hall, C, "What Does the Public Want From Agriculture and the Countryside? A Review of Evidence and Methods", Journal of Rural Studies, 20(2), pp.211~225 (2004)
- Heide, H, "Nation as a Strategic Variable of the Capital", Theory Quarterly, 6 (1993)
- 허정회, "지속가능한 농업 발전에 대한 영향 요인 분석", 농업경영.정책연구, 45(4), pp.721~741 (2018), 한국농식품정책학회[DOI]
- Howley, P, "Contrasting the Attitudes of Farmers and the General Public Regarding the ‘Multifunctional’ Role of the Agricultural Sector", Land Use Policy, 38, pp.248~256 (2014)
- Hwang, S .C, "How Has Agricultural Paradigm Been Evolved", Agricultural Policy Quarterly, 51, pp.189~217 (2014)
- Hwang, S. C, "How to Change the Agriculture Development Strategy", A Paper presented at FARP 25th Anniversary Symposium (2018)
- Jeong, H. S, "Desirable Direction of Social Investment Policy", A paper presented at Korean Academy of Social Welfare Annual Conference (Summer), pp.143~166 (2007)
- Jung, J. K, "A Time Lag Approach to Public Administration and Public Policy", Korean Public Administration Review, 36(1), pp.1~19 (2002)
- 정정길, "정책과 제도의 변화과정과 인과법칙의 동태적 성격- 시차적(時差的) 접근방법 (Time Lag Approach)을 위한 제언 -", 한국정책학회보, 11(2), pp.255~272 (2002), 한국정책학회
- 김형성, "한국 농업정책의 시차적 접근-농가소득지원 정책과 농업구조조정 정책을 중심으로-", 한국행정논집, 21(1), pp.169~201 (2009), 한국정부학회
- 김정태, "사회적 인식과의 비교를 통해 본 농업·농촌 연구주제의 내용과 평가 : 텍스트마이닝 분석을 중심으로", 농촌사회, 28(1), pp.65~103 (2018), 한국농촌사회학회[DOI]
- Kim, S. S, "A Study on Sustainable Agriculture Paradigm: Centering on Agricultural Policy System in Switzerland" (2018), KREI
- Kim, S. S, "The Evaluation of Agricultural Multifunctionality- Focused on Sustainable Livestock Production" (2018), KREI
- Kim, S. S, "A Study on the Social Conflict Management in the Agricultural and Rural Sector: Current Situation and Policy Implications" (2015), KREI
- Kim, T. Y, "Multifunctionality in Korean agriculture: Somewhat Uncomfortable Truth" (2015), GSnJ Institute
- Kim, T. Y, "Necessity of Korean Agricultural Policy Reform: Direction and Suggestion", 2016 GSnJ Symposium (2016)
- Kim, Y. R, "Measuring Willingness to Pay of the Public on Multifunctionality" (2013), KREI
- 공기서, "기후변화를 고려한 논농업의 다원적 기능 가치", 농업경영.정책연구, 40(2), pp.352~380 (2013), 한국농식품정책학회
- 2016 Agricultural Water Quality Research Report, "KRCC(Korea Rural Community Corporate)", ~ (2016)
- Lee, J. H, "Vision of Korean Agriculture: Way for Rationalizing Agricultural Policy" (2012), Ministry of Economy and Finance
- 이홍림, "편익이전 기법을 이용한 개별 및 지역별 농촌어메니티 자원의 가치 추정", 농업경제연구, 56(3), pp.1~27 (2015), 한국농업경제학회
- Lee, M. K, "Innovation, Productivity, and Sustainability in Korean Agri-food Sector: Application of OECD Framework" (2017), KREI
- Lee, M. H, "From Subordinaries’ Agriculture to Citizens’ Agriculture", Agricultural Policy Quarterly, 64, pp.24~27 (2017)
- Lee, T. H, "Mid-term Review of Recent Agricultural Policy" (2011), MAFRA
- Lynne, G, "Modifying the Neo-classical Approach to Technology Adoption with Behavioural Science Models", Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 27(1), pp.67~80 (1995)
- Miceli, V, "EU Agricultural Policy: the Concept of Multifunctionality and Value Added Agriculture" (2005), CRANEC
- Morris, J, "Promoting Farmer Uptake of Agri-environment Schemes: the Countryside Stewardship Arable Options Scheme", Land Use Policy, 17, pp.241~254 (2000)
- Wirtschaften, N. V, "Wege Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften" (2013), Marburg
- OECD, "Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework" (2001), OECD Publishing
- OECD, "Public Goods and Externalities: Agri-environmental Policy Measures in Selected OECD Countries" (2015), OECD Publishing
- OECD, "Analysing Policies to Improve Agricultural Productivity Growth, Sustainability" (2015), OECD Publishing
- Oh, N. W, "Challenges for Enlarging and Reforming of Direct Payment Cchemes" (2017), KREI
- Oh, S. I, "An Evaluation of Multifunctionality in Agriculture" (2001), KREI
- Park, S. J, "An Approach to Advanced Agricultural Policy Toward the Open Economy", KREI (2007)
- Pretty, J, "Agricultural Sustainability: Concepts, Principles and Evidence", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, pp.447~465 (2008)
- Pretty, J, "Policy Challenges and Priorities for Internalizing the Externalities of Modern Agriculture", Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(2), pp.263~283 (2001)
- RDA, "Evaluation Method on Multifunctionality in Agriculture" (2001), Rural Development Agency
- Rhew, C. H, "Farm Economy Status and Transition Trajectories in Korea: Implications and Challenges", A paper presented at KAEA Annual Conference (Summer) (2019)
- Rhew, C. H, "Farm Economy Status during 2013-2017: Challenges and Implications" (2019), KREI
- Rhew, C. H, "A Study on Enhancing the Direct Payment Schemes Based on Multi-faceted Evaluation" (2016), KREI
- Rhew, C. H, "Income Inequality Across Farms in Korea: Implications and Challenges", Research Brief. R, (9) (2018)
- Rhew, C. H, "The policy Agenda and Direction for Enhancing Multifunctionality in Agriculture" (2018), KREI
- Rhew, C. H, "The Policy Agenda and Direction for Enhancing Multifunctionality in Agriculture: Supplementary Note" (2018), KREI
- Rhew, C. H, "Farm Economy 2013-2017: Status and Implication", Agricultural Policy Focus, (179), pp.179~ (2019)
- "SAI PLATFORM"[URL]
- 신용광, "농촌 다원적 기능의 경제적 가치와 편익이전", 농촌계획, 10(1), pp.1~7 (2004), 한국농촌계획학회
- Sydorovych, O, "The Meaning of Agricultural Sustainability: Evidence from a Conjoint Choice Survey", Agricultural Systems, 98(1), pp.10~20 (2008)
- Varian, H. R, "Microeconomic Analysis" (1992), W. W. Norton & Company
- Von Wirén-Lehr, S, "Sustainability in Agriculture - An Evaluation of Principal Goal- oriented Concepts to Close the Gap Between Theory and Practice", Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 84(2), pp.115~129 (2001)
- Yoo, J. C, "The Measurement of Integrated Value of Agriculture as Market and Non- market Services: Contingent Valuation Method", Korean Journal of Agricultural Management, 26(1), pp.3~12 (1999)
- 유진채, "유기농업의 공익기능에 대한 경제적 가치 평가 -실험선택법을 적용하여-", 한국유기농업학회지, 18(3), pp.291~313 (2010), 한국유기농업학회
- Yoo, Y. B, "Revealing Korean Agricultural Growth Path and the Analysis of Its Structural Change" (2016), Rural Development Agency
- 윤병선, "대안농업운동의 전개과정에 대한 고찰", 농촌사회, 20(1), pp.131~160 (2010), 한국농촌사회학회
- Yunlong, C, "Sustainability in Agriculture: A General Review", Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 49(3), pp.299~307 (1994)
- Zawojska, A, "The Economic and Social Justifications for Public Spending to Agriculture: Theoretical insights and empirical observations", Oeconomia, 12(4), pp.133~143 (2013)