현대중국어 어기부사의 주관화 과정 고찰- 다행·반문·의외류를 중심으로 -
A Study on the Subjectification process of modal adverb in modern Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This analysis examined semantic, syntactic change on fluke type modal adverbs such as 亏得, 幸亏, cross-question type modal adverbs as like 难道, 何必 and unexpectedness type modal adverbs as in 居然, 竟然 in modern Chinese. fluke type modal adverbs such as 亏得, 幸亏, the meaning of ‘loss’ has moved to meaning of lack or shortage and it has been filled, and turned into meaning of sufficient. At last it has settled in the meaning of psychological stability by intervening psychological rebound reaction. Cross-question type modal adverb ‘难道’ has been altered to the meaning of ‘difficult to affirm’ from being derived the original meaning in each word ‘difficult’ and ‘refer’, currently is being used in the meaning of ‘at all or ever’ due to somewhat negative psychological mechanism. ‘何’ had already been presented negative meaning of ‘on what ground’ in ancient Chinese, ‘必’ has also been being used in meaning ‘must be done’ with no great change, ‘何必’ is in use for negative counter-question meaning of ‘on what ground should something to be done’ in modern Chinese. Lastly, unexpectedness type modal adverb ‘居然’ is currently being used in meaning of ‘unexpectedly’ in modern Chinese by setting off from it’s original meaning ‘sit’ to ‘safe’ through psychological mechanism, after extension and differentiation to ‘显然’, ‘竟然’ has been changed to ‘finally’ by going through modification in part of speech with meaning extention from it’s original meaning ‘finish’, is being used the meaning of ‘unexpectedly’ in modern Chinese.
Abstract
This analysis examined semantic, syntactic change on fluke type modal adverbs such as 亏得, 幸亏, cross-question type modal adverbs as like 难道, 何必 and unexpectedness type modal adverbs as in 居然, 竟然 in modern Chinese. fluke type modal adverbs such as 亏得, 幸亏, the meaning of ‘loss’ has moved to meaning of lack or shortage and it has been filled, and turned into meaning of sufficient. At last it has settled in the meaning of psychological stability by intervening psychological rebound reaction. Cross-question type modal adverb ‘难道’ has been altered to the meaning of ‘difficult to affirm’ from being derived the original meaning in each word ‘difficult’ and ‘refer’, currently is being used in the meaning of ‘at all or ever’ due to somewhat negative psychological mechanism. ‘何’ had already been presented negative meaning of ‘on what ground’ in ancient Chinese, ‘必’ has also been being used in meaning ‘must be done’ with no great change, ‘何必’ is in use for negative counter-question meaning of ‘on what ground should something to be done’ in modern Chinese. Lastly, unexpectedness type modal adverb ‘居然’ is currently being used in meaning of ‘unexpectedly’ in modern Chinese by setting off from it’s original meaning ‘sit’ to ‘safe’ through psychological mechanism, after extension and differentiation to ‘显然’, ‘竟然’ has been changed to ‘finally’ by going through modification in part of speech with meaning extention from it’s original meaning ‘finish’, is being used the meaning of ‘unexpectedly’ in modern Chinese.
참고문헌 (17)
- 김련옥, "한·중 양태부사 대조 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2013
- 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (2016), 한국문화사
- 北京语言学院语言教学研究所, "现代汉语频率词典" (1996), 北京语言学院出版社
- 段玉裁, "说文解字注" (1988), 上海古籍出版社
- 罗辉华, "“何必", 何苦的词汇话与语法化, 2010, pp.(2), 31~39
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (2017), 商务印书馆
- 齐春红, "现代汉语气副词研究", 박사, 语言学系, pp.2006
- 邵敬敏, "“幸亏” 类副词的句法语义、虚化轨迹及其历史层次", 语言教学与研究, (4), pp.56~64 (2011)
- 沈家煊, "语言的“主观性”和“主观化”", 外语教学与研究, (2), pp.268~271 (2001)
- 史金生, "语气副词的范围、类别和共现顺序", 中国语文, (1), pp.17~31 (2003)
- 文 旭, "语法化暨有关问题的讨论", 外国语言文学研究, (2), pp.39~44 (2001)
- 『现代汉语常用词表』课题组, "现代汉语常用词表" (2008), 商务印书馆
- 邢志群, "汉语动词语法化的机制", 语言学论丛, (28), pp.93~113 (2003)
- 张谊生, "现代汉语副词研究" (2018), 商务印书馆
- 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室, "现代汉语词典" (2016), 商务印书馆
- Bybee, J., "The Handbook of Historical Linguistics", pp.602~623 (2003)
- Ren Yang, "A Study on the Levels of Grammaticalization of the New Degree Adverbs in Chinese", 동북아 문화연구, 1(66), pp.133~149 (2021), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]